S
Surprisekitty
Guest
Well, I was browsing Ebay and I came across a few 1st class relics that were housed inside small cross reliquary’s that frequently appeared attached to rosary’s and the like.
Now, I was browsing around and whenever someone mentions buying a relic, another always says “It is illegal to buy or sell relics unless you give it to the church for veneration.”
But that’s what is confusing me - If 1st class relics are supposed to be venerated publicly, why are there antique rosary reliquaries that house (multiple) 1st class relics? Were they intended for private use?
And if so, if one were to buy such a reliquary (with relics), should you still give them it to the Church? I mean, such a reliquary (rosary) doesn’t seem constructed for public veneration in mind.
Before anyone asks, I don’t intend to commit simony, I just like browsing around. Although I would dearly love to have one of those reliquary rosaries with the multiple 1st class relics inside for use in my daily rosary, I don’t think I could do more good buying a relic for around 400$ when I could spend that 400$ giving to the poor or something, which I believe cannon law says is one of the conditions for buying a relic right? Well, something along those lines at least.
Actually, could someone link me a site to explain simony in depth? I honestly find myself confused on the church’s “No buying of relics” stance. If such relics were put into rosaries for private use, obviously it was allowed at one point. I mean, how many relics are just holed up in Rome never being venerated or even seen? I don’t know, it just seems odd to me, I don’t see how the faithful having even a small relic does anything bad for one’s faith and worship. On a related note, hasn’t making 1st class relics impossible to obtain actually empowered the relic market on Ebay? All the people selling ‘reliquarys’ for so much money really infuriates me.
Now, I was browsing around and whenever someone mentions buying a relic, another always says “It is illegal to buy or sell relics unless you give it to the church for veneration.”
But that’s what is confusing me - If 1st class relics are supposed to be venerated publicly, why are there antique rosary reliquaries that house (multiple) 1st class relics? Were they intended for private use?
And if so, if one were to buy such a reliquary (with relics), should you still give them it to the Church? I mean, such a reliquary (rosary) doesn’t seem constructed for public veneration in mind.
Before anyone asks, I don’t intend to commit simony, I just like browsing around. Although I would dearly love to have one of those reliquary rosaries with the multiple 1st class relics inside for use in my daily rosary, I don’t think I could do more good buying a relic for around 400$ when I could spend that 400$ giving to the poor or something, which I believe cannon law says is one of the conditions for buying a relic right? Well, something along those lines at least.
Actually, could someone link me a site to explain simony in depth? I honestly find myself confused on the church’s “No buying of relics” stance. If such relics were put into rosaries for private use, obviously it was allowed at one point. I mean, how many relics are just holed up in Rome never being venerated or even seen? I don’t know, it just seems odd to me, I don’t see how the faithful having even a small relic does anything bad for one’s faith and worship. On a related note, hasn’t making 1st class relics impossible to obtain actually empowered the relic market on Ebay? All the people selling ‘reliquarys’ for so much money really infuriates me.