E
EndTimes
Guest
AS you’re completely free to believe .the evidence and the context, especially in chapter 24, do not point to a still unknown future generation.
AS you’re completely free to believe .the evidence and the context, especially in chapter 24, do not point to a still unknown future generation.
there was a massacre of the Jews by the Romans, however the Christians , who had been forewarned fled to Petra and not one Christian perished.,This is why I don’t believe this passage is speaking about a still future event. Why should only people in Judea flee to the mountains? And what good is fleeing to the mountains going to do during the second coming?
They were told to flee to the mountains because the Roman armies were coming to destroy the temple and the city.
From my understanding the second coming is referenced in other passages and I don’t dispute that.Catholic teaching is that this prophecy will be fulfilled a second timefor Jerusalem, but, not necessarily , in the same way .
It’s a sacrilege because of what Jerusalem represented back then The Temple was the dwelling place of God. That is no longer the case and the views that a third temple will be built and become the sole dwelling place of God, as it was back then, is not consistent with Scripture or Church teaching. The Church is the new Jerusalem, the physical location of Jerusalem no longer has any relevance with regards to this prophecy.“But when you see Jerusalem surrounded by armies, then know that its desolation has come near. Then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains, and let those who are inside the city depart, and let not those who are out in the country enter it;
Luke 21:20-21
In my DR Bible the footnotes state : - in 1 Mach 1:57 an application of the prophecy is found in the setting up of a statue of Jupiter in the temple. The prophecy will be fulilled a second time for Jerusalem, but not necessarily in the same way.I’m speaking primarily of the prophecy written in Matthew 24 and again referenced in Luke 21. The desolating sacrilege isn’t mentioned in Matthew but Luke tells us what it is.
Are - The physical location of the Third Temple and the physical location of Jerusalem - the same?It’s a sacrilege because of what Jerusalem represented back then The Temple was the dwelling place of God. That is no longer the case and the views that a third temple will be built and become the sole dwelling place of God, as it was back then, is not consistent with Scripture or Church teaching.
The Church is the new Jerusalem,
the physical location of Jerusalem no longer has any relevance with regards to this prophecy.
Right. The prophecy was fulfilled in AD 70 when the Roman armies destroyed the Temple and the old covenant was done away with; replaced by the Church and the New covenant.In my DR Bible the footnotes state : - in 1 Mach 1:57 an application of the prophecy is found in the setting up of a statue of Jupiter in the temple. The prophecy will be fulilled a second time for Jerusalem, but not necessarily in the same way.
I’m not sure, I don’t recall any scripture passages that reference a third Temple nor it’s location. Presumably it would be in Jerusalem if one were to believe that those in Judea are to flee to the mountains.Are - The physical location of the Third Temple and the physical location of Jerusalem - the same?
The Old Covenant was history via Jesus - before the destruction of Jerusalem.Carmel:![]()
Right. The prophecy was fulfilled in AD 70 when the Roman armies destroyed the Temple and the old covenant was done away with; replaced by the Church and the New covenant.In my DR Bible the footnotes state : - in 1 Mach 1:57 an application of the prophecy is found in the setting up of a statue of Jupiter in the temple. The prophecy will be fulilled a second time for Jerusalem, but not necessarily in the same way.
I’m not sure, I don’t recall any scripture passages that reference a third Temple nor it’s location. Presumably it would be in Jerusalem if one were to believe that those in Judea are to flee to the mountains.Are - The physical location of the Third Temple and the physical location of Jerusalem - the same?
A temple is the place where God is worshipped.The Old Covenant was history via Jesus - before the destruction of Jerusalem.
Today’s 3rd Temple Jews reference a Third Temple - from the OT .
And the antiChrist is mentioned in reference to sitting himself in a temple claiming he’s God.
God’s TEMPLE is no longer one made of Bricks and Mortar. .
WE are the Temple of God
Was… Since JESUS - WE are the Temple of God.A temple is the place where God is worshipped.
Some people say the end-time anti-Christ is not a man but a spirit, that the man of sin is never called “the anti-Christ” in the bible. Well - ‘he’ is called “the anti-Christ” and personal pronouns are used to describe him.I think its generally accepted Church teaching that the antichrist is an individual . The evangelist John spoke of ’ many antichrists ’ but there is also the archetype .
God’s Word is not being used to distract us, Christians typically do a pretty good job of distracting themselves. In the end it DOES matter what details are true. Preparing for “the end” goes beyond believing,…in the end it doesn’t matter what detail is true or not because if we follow the Holy Spirit, the Holy Spirit will lead us to God. So be at peace and trust in God.
Most Protestants believe - or have the bulk of Christians believing stuff that will never come to pass. I recently mentioned some of these things on my home page.“if we follow the Holy Spirit, the Holy Spirit will lead us to God. So be at peace and trust in God.”
Some people do not know their Scriptures.Some people say the end-time anti-Christ is not a man but a spirit,
In the Bible seven is the number of perfection or completeness.I don’t think anyone really knows what the 666 stands for.
John never told us , all he wrote was it will take Wisdom.
We do know the Beast / False Prophet will carry the mark of 666.