666 Mark of the Beast fulfilled

  • Thread starter Thread starter nordskoven
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Doesn’t sound very private to me.
“Private” in the theological sense means not part of the deposit of faith once and for all delivered to the apostles in the first century. In other words, later “private” revelations are not part of the general “public” revelation given to the apostles.

From the Catechism of the Catholic Church:
**67 **Throughout the ages, there have been so-called “private” revelations, some of which have been recognized by the authority of the Church. They do not belong, however, to the deposit of faith. It is not their role to improve or complete Christ’s definitive Revelation, but to help live more fully by it in a certain period of history. Guided by the Magisterium of the Church, the sensus fidelium knows how to discern and welcome in these revelations whatever constitutes an authentic call of Christ or his saints to the Church.
Christian faith cannot accept “revelations” that claim to surpass or correct the Revelation of which Christ is the fulfillment, as is the case in certain non-Christian religions and also in certain recent sects which base themselves on such “revelations”.
From the pre-Vatican II reference by Ludwig Ott, Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma:
With Christ and the Apostles General Revelation concluded. (sent. certa.)

Pope Pius X rejected the liberal Protestant and Modernistic doctrine of the evolution of religion through “New Revelations.” Thus he condemned the proposition that: "The Revelation, which is the object of Catholic Faith, was not terminated with the Apostles." D 2021.
You can accept Fatima if you so choose. But the Church does not include this as an object of Catholic faith.
 
The book of Revelations is a highly political book. It was written at a time when Jewish Christians were being persecuted by both Jews and Romans. It is widely believed that the “Beast” referred to in the book of Revelations is, and was Nero Caesar. Some believe that the book of Revelations is a riddle and was actually written the way it was because if it fell into the hands of the Pharisees or Roman citizens, then that would cause more persecution of the Christians. It’s my belief that 616 (or 666) refers to Nero.

jimmyakin.org/2005/01/666.html
 
Santa Cruz:
On October 15, 1917 an article published in, O Seculo newspaper Avelino de Almeida wrote: This crowd, which unbaised estimates of learned persons, very foreign to mystical influences(sic), place at somewhere between 30-40 thousand people. 15 days later he corrected his first estimate and said 50 thousand people gathered at Fatime and witnessed the “miracle of the sun”.

The Whole Truth About Fatima
by Michel de la Sainte Trinite, he holds a Master,s degree in letters from Sorbonne and a licentiate in philosophy from the Institut Catholique of Paris. He entered the community of, Little Brothers of the Sacred Heart in 1970

Doesn’t sound very private to me.

Three Popes including, John Paul the Great, have approved the
apparition at Fatima.
Doesn’t change a thing. Fatima as well as any other approved apparition is a mater of private revelation. Public revelation ended centuries ago.

Read the Catechism.

There will be no further Revelation

66
"The Christian economy, therefore, since it is the new and definitive Covenant, will never pass away; and no new public revelation is to be expected before the glorious manifestation of our Lord Jesus Christ."28 Yet even if Revelation is already complete, it has not been made completely explicit; it remains for Christian faith gradually to grasp its full significance over the course of the centuries.

67 Throughout the ages, there have been so-called “private” revelations, some of which have been recognized by the authority of the Church. They do not belong, however, to the deposit of faith. It is not their role to improve or complete Christ’s definitive Revelation, but to help live more fully by it in a certain period of history. Guided by the Magisterium of the Church, the sensus fidelium knows how to discern and welcome in these revelations whatever constitutes an authentic call of Christ or his saints to the Church.

Christian faith cannot accept “revelations” that claim to surpass or correct the Revelation of which Christ is the fulfillment, as is the case in certain non-Christian religions and also in certain recent sects which base themselves on such “revelations”.
 
The Third Secret of Fatima could be interepeted to refer to the End Times (I personaly hold this position but I feel it deals with the assassination of a future Pope perhaps during the Minor Chastisment or The Great Tribulation when the Antichrist will rule the world) however that is irrelevant. The FACT is that it should never be considered an Article of Faith since it is a Private Revelation it can not by definition add to the Deposit of Faith given to us from the Apostles.
 
40.png
starrs0:
The Third Secret of Fatima could be interepeted to refer to the End Times (I personaly hold this position but I feel it deals with the assassination of a future Pope perhaps during the Minor Chastisment or The Great Tribulation when the Antichrist will rule the world) however that is irrelevant. The FACT is that it should never be considered an Article of Faith since it is a Private Revelation it can not by definition add to the Deposit of Faith given to us from the Apostles.
Yet Pope John Paul II has said that it spoke of his attempted assassination to which Sr Lucia agreed.

How do you reconcile your view with that one?

This is the problem inherent with private revelations.
 
I feel it involves the murder of a future Pope because in the vision the man in white (a pope) is killed by a hail of gunfire in a ruined city. It says nothing (at least in my humble opinion) of the attempt on the life of John Paul The Great becaus the pope in the vision is killed by many assailants not surviving the shot of a lone gunman. But what do I know I could be wrong.
 
40.png
starrs0:
I feel it involves the murder of a future Pope because in the vision the man in white (a pope) is killed by a hail of gunfire in a ruined city. It says nothing (at least in my humble opinion) of the attempt on the life of John Paul The Great becaus the pope in the vision is killed by many assailants not surviving the shot of a lone gunman. But what do I know I could be wrong.
And there is the rub.

Many of the approved apparitions have given such dire warnings but it is understood that those can be changed though prayer by the faithful.

I believe that this is one such thing. Especially because Pope John Paul II said that the third secret had to do with him and the assassination attempt.
 
I hope we never get to the point where spychips can be implanted in our body. If God wanted us to have spychips he would have given us spy chips, wait, is that wings-no guess I’m confused. :eek:
 
Check your social security cards. The original ones released around the reign of Hitler had words similar to “Not to be used for Identification” stamed on them. What can you buy without it now? How many digits are in a social security card? xxx-xx-xxxx

9

How many possible combinations of 9 are there in a social security card?

999999999

What is this upside down?

666 666 666

Good luck and may God be with you.

The end has been upon us longer than you know. No confessional booth will save us nor will confessing our sins when Christ comes again. As I’ve posted in a few other sections:

HEB 10:26 If we deliberately keep on sinning after we have received the knowledge of the truth, no sacrifice for sins is left, 27 but only a fearful expectation of judgment and of raging fire that will consume the enemies of God.

Christ commanded that we be perfect as our heavenly Father is, yet religions teach us what works for us. If you believe in the world, you do not believe in God. Do you think Satan opened your eyes in the Garden of Eden so that you might find God? He opened your eyes so that you might come to believe in what you see. This seems to be the agnostic and atheist trend as well…

No I’m not suggesting that the social security card is the mark of the beast. Honestly, I have no idea. I do know that our end is near though.
 
Preterism, that says that all prophecy has been fulfilled except for Christ’s Second Coming, and Semi-Preterism, that says that most prophecy has been fulfilled, overlooks what Father William G. Most calls “multiple fulfillment” or types pointing to ultimate fulfillment. Even the more palatable Semi-Preterism taught by Catholic convert pop theologians, possibly as a reaction to their former fundy “date setting” prophecy beliefs, rashly overlooks Most’s “multiple fulfillment” principle.

John’s Apocalypse had types of fulfillment pointing to ultimate fulfillment in another era that would see a rebuilt temple, for one. The Mark of the Beast and European Union as Daniel’s revived Roman Empire are recent developments. So is Chernobyl, literally “Wormwood” which is the event that sent many in the Ukraine and Russia to dust off their Bibles.

Fatima, for example, may be seen as the fulfillment of the “great sign” that appears in the heavens, the woman clothed with the Sun. Sister Lucia, in directing sculptor-priest Father McGlynn in making a representation of her vision, said she seemed to be clothed in light, indicted by wavy lines in his interpretation of her clothing. McGlynn’s statue is the basis for the Fatima belltower representation, uniquely different from the Pilgrim Virgin statue as showing a more tender, ethnic beauty suggestive of the Virgin of Guadalupe.

While Sister Lucia’s private revelation is optional as regards belief, one may not suggest that it is extrabiblical as she herself pointed to Fatima’s message being entailed in Chapters 8-13 of John’s Apocalypse, which includes disasters, and the Mark of the Beast. It is of course not dogma that Our Lady of the Rosary’s appearance at Fatima, Portugal, fulfilled John’s “great sign” but the wise will discern the signs of the times as Christ said.

Immaculate Heart of Mary, pray for us now and at the hour of our death. AMEN
 
The word “Jesus” occurs 983 times in the Bible.

The word “love” occurs 314.

There are 3 persons in the Trinity.

So Jesus-Love-Trinity=983-314-3=666

The Jews believe in Jesus, but not that He came out of the love of God, and they don’t believe in the Trinity, so they must be the antichrist, right?
 
The number 666 in the book of Revelation in its conclusion calls for “Wisdom”. The wisdom is the gift God gave to Solomon who violated the laws given to the kings of God’s people, not to multiply gold, wives, chariots… Solomon violated all of them, thats why the number of the beast 6, (which is the(sixth) creation day God created the Beasts and Man. What seperates the beast and man, man has a soul and is called to rest in God in the sabbath 7th.day.) is attributed to solomon 666 and calling for wisdom. The number 666 is not to be feared. God’s word is the same yesterday,today and forever, What beast is there to fear when Jesus said “behold I will never leave you”. We can learn from history, and seek God in the present that will determine our future. To me every word of God is for all generations past, present and future. For confirmation on visions, revelations, prophecies For me I will seek the Holy and Apostolic Catholic Church teachings. There are many many personal revelations to 666 and most of them preach fear, Revelations" 666" only calls for wisdom. For “fear is of the devil”. “God is Love”.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top