A compelling non-Catholic argument

  • Thread starter Thread starter OnlyAmbrose
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
As far as the NT not being authored by Catholic men…that I totally agree with…the author is the Holy Spirt…HOWEVER…God chose to use MEN to be the writing tools of the Holy Spirit…the Holy Spirit used MEN to write down an INFALLIBLE book. The Holy Spirit used fallible men to write infallible books.

So is it really THAT far fetched to think that the Holy Spirit would protect a man from teaching error? I think not. Since it has been done MANY times before.

The Catholic Church did not write the NT…but used Her divine authority to RECOGNIZE Her husband’s word. The Church used it’s Christ given authority to recognize what was God’s infallible word and what is not. It is this same authority we turn to for the case of interpreting scripture. If the Church had authority to recognize inspired text…it surely can determine their true meaning. There is only ONE complete faith as Paul, and Christ speak of.
 
Christ is not a creation of my mind. He is eternal God. I didn’t create His Church. Christ did. I didn’t place authority in His Church. Christ did. I or my Pastor doesn’t run my Church but the Holy Spirit does. This is my Faith. It is not with pride that I accept this but in humility and Faith. As Catholics, we believe that to construct your own church and theology is what is prideful.

By the way, since the wisdom of God is infinite, Catholics don’t believe that the Church as been revealed everything but all that has been revealed to it is True.

You are so right that salvation comes from Christ. What we believe is that Christ gave us the Church to be a temporal means for us to know the “sure and normal” way toward Salvation.

When we hear all the cacophony of different churches, we don’t see Christ as the sole head but Christ at best as an “advisor” who continually is trumped by the disparate teaching of many different people.

Protestantman, I know this seems harsh. But no more so than your implication that we place the Church above Christ. I know that the concept that Christ and Holy Spirit are mysteriously and perfectly joined to the Church is hard to grasp as it is outside your learning and tradition. I’m just trying to drive the point home so you at least grasp our perspective. It is a thread implied in so much of our conversation. If you miss that perspective, you will miss the nuance of much that we are saying.

Because we have spoken with One unchanging voice since Pentecost, our Faith is reinforced as we see how Christ makes good on His promises to be with us always, that the Holy Spirit is truly guiding us, the Church is the Pillar and Bulwark of Truth, and that the Gates of Hell shall not prevail.

Well, it is possible to believe in Christ and reject the Church as many obviously do. The critical question is whether the rejection is by intentional sin or uninintentional ignorance.

Protestantman, I beg that you not over-react to the very strong response to your assertions. This is our Faith. Catholic Christians should believe it so strongly that we are prepared to die for it as so many Saints before us have done.

You asked some very good questions and made some very pointed assertions. This is good as it is dialogue. I took no offense at anything you asked or said. I hope you too no offense at my response.

Your summary of your faith was illuminating to me. I hope that what we are doing is illuminating to you. Besides just gaining better understanding of us, I hope that you are getting a sense that Catholics believe and do what we do out of submission to Christ. We might not be able to reconcile our differences and I’m not trying to promote some type “I’m OK, you’re OK” relativism so much as I want that impressions you have of the Church based on false information gets removed.

I feel much better when someone of your spirit and heart says:

“I understand Catholic teaching on the Eucharist but I’m not convinced. I understand Catholic teaching on Authority but I’m not convinced.” And the list goes on.

Maybe this is helpful. There is much that the Church teaches as True that I can’t get my head or heart around. As a Catholic I’m asked to assent in obedience of Faith to these teachings as obedience grants me graces for my battle with Satan. But I must always bring my heart in prayer and mind in learning to be acting not from obedience but understanding and love. There is no sin in this so long as I’m pursuing a reconciliation with sincerity. I make not condemnation or admonishment of you because you have the same “failing”😉 . I have no vision into your interior life and how the Holy Spirit is working in you.

And, part of the reason that I might not have my head and heart around these teachings is that I have a false understanding of the teaching. It is not the teaching that is false but my understanding. My false understanding may be from sin which requires that I remove that with God’s help. My false understanding can be from bad information which requires me to remove that with God’s guidance. While following this false understanding of the teaching in obedience isn’t ideal, I believe that God gives me graces in reward of obedience such that the false understanding will not be an impediment to my Salvation but ultimately lead to future true illumination.

There are some teachings that I have just my head around but not my heart. For these, I’m working on my Spiritual development so that my heart can embrace them as I believe the Holy Spirit desires. This is the focus of my prayer life.

There are some teachings that I have my heart around but not my head. For these, I participate in CAF discussions, read and learn from various sources, etc.

And there are others that the Church teaches as True that I do have my head/heart around because the Holy Spirit has convicted me of the Truth. It is these that I cling to with a fervent heart and mind as I know this is my path to Salvation.

It is my suspicion that most Catholics are similar. Sometimes you will see this in tone, focus, and arguments/comments. For instance, I will sometimes make a really good intellectual argument (in my mind at least) but it lacks heart and passion. I’m trying to bring my mind to where my heart is. Conversely, when I show too much passion, I’m trying to bring my heart where my mind is.

I thank God that I believe that I have my heart and mind around Authority and Real Presence. I’m convicted. I’m working feverishly as so many of my prudential judgments do not give me peace where my heart and mind conflict. If you stick around, you will find these areas by reading some of my other posts. 😃

P.S. Protestantman: Does some of this go in your testimony thread? 🙂
Yes this counts as testimony.

I have one question for you. What is the Body of Christ?
 
This sure seems to indicate that Peter is upon whom Christ himself built the Church. What you say seems to indicate that man was to build the Church on Christ.

Mathew 16:15-19 "He said to them, “But who do you say that I am?” Simon Peter said in reply, “You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God.” Jesus said to him in reply, “Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah. For flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but my heavenly Father.
And so I say to you, you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of the netherworld shall not prevail against it. I will give you the keys to the kingdom of heaven. Whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven; and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.”

Also note, that in addition to ordaining Peter as the rock which is to become the Pillar and Bulward of Truth, Christ illuminated something else. Peter didn’t say this because it was Peter’s self-determined opinion that Jesus is God but because it was inspired by God. Christ made it clear that it was Peter who He had especially selected among His Apostles for special Holy Inspiration and insight.
Ephesians 2 says that Christ is the chief cornerstone.

19Consequently, you are no longer foreigners and aliens, but fellow citizens with God’s people and members of God’s household, 20built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, with Christ Jesus himself as the chief cornerstone. 21In him the whole building is joined together and rises to become a holy temple in the Lord. 22And in him you too are being built together to become a dwelling in which God lives by his Spirit.
 
guanophore;3400381:
Fortunately, the Catholic faith is not based on the Bible,
Than by your own profession, it cannot be of God.
Is the Creation from God? It didn’t come from the Bible, either.

In fact, Moses didn’t write the first words of the Old Testament down until some time between 1446 and 1406 BC.

Was everything that happened before that “not from God”? 🤷

(Yes, it’s true - Adam and Eve never read the Bible!! :eek: Neither did Noah, or Abraham and Sarah!! :eek: :eek: )
 
“Why persecutest thou Me?” Acts 9:5

Jesus and His Church are one and the same. When Saul was persecuting the earthly Church and harassing its human leaders, Jesus was feeling the wounds.
No. For one, those who live in Christ are the church, not any man made institution. Jesus is the High Priest, and all who live in him are the church. This is the church that Christ created. The Catholic Church is an institution of man.
 
So…if all beliefs that come from God must be found in scripture…then your belief in SOLA scriptura is also NOT from God.

Catholicism does indeed follow the scriptures…for the scriptures speak of two forms of teaching that one must “hold fast” and keep. Both…not one or the other. One is by “epistle” and the other is by “word of mouth.” Scripture AND Tradition…these are what St. Paul tells us to hold. Not one or the other.

The Church follows both…in keeping with what the Bible commands.
 
He was a sinner as you say below. The denial of Jesus during His Passion is all the evidence we need.

I think you have opened a can of worms.

Non-Catholics are so critical of good works as it doesn’t define us. But your argument points to a theology that “bad works” define a person. You can’t have it both ways.

This being said, I’m not sure I grasp your point or relevance.
Christ seems to opose your belief.
Matthew 7:15-23

15"Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves. 16By their fruit you will recognize them. Do people pick grapes from thornbushes, or figs from thistles? 17Likewise every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. 18A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit. 19Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20Thus, by their fruit you will recognize them.
21"Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only he who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. 22Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and in your name drive out demons and perform many miracles?’ 23Then I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!’
 
No. For one, those who live in Christ are the church, not any man made institution. Jesus is the High Priest, and all who live in him are the church. This is the church that Christ created. The Catholic Church is an institution of man.
This is where we disagree. In John 21:15-19, we Catholics see Jesus appointing Peter to be our first Pope. We then look at history and see that our line of Popes extends in an unbroken line all the way back to Peter. 🙂

Obviously, therefore, it is Jesus Christ who established the Catholic Church.

When we look at Protestantism and trace back their succession of leadership, we come to the end of the line when we reach various different men - Martin Luther (Lutherans, 1521), John Calvin (Dutch Reformed), John Knox (Presbyterian, 1560), Alexander Campbell (Disciples of Christ Christian), John Smythe (Baptist), and so on.
 
The Holy Spirit used fallible men to write infallible books.
This is an unbiblical statement. The Holy Spirit used sinfull man to write an infallable book. Are you saying that God can’t do that?
 
Christ seems to opose your belief.
Matthew 7:15-23

15"Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves. 16By their fruit you will recognize them. Do people pick grapes from thornbushes, or figs from thistles? 17Likewise every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. 18A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit. 19Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20Thus, by their fruit you will recognize them.
21"Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only he who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. 22Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and in your name drive out demons and perform many miracles?’ 23Then I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!’
So, then, (opposite to Protestant belief, then) good works are important? Or is this only for Catholics? Protestants can go on sinning their little brains out, and still be “eternally saved,” but even one Catholic steps out of line even once, and that’s proof that it’s a false religion? 🤷
 
Is the Creation from God? It didn’t come from the Bible, either.

In fact, Moses didn’t write the first words of the Old Testament down until some time between 1446 and 1406 BC.

Was everything that happened before that “not from God”? 🤷

(Yes, it’s true - Adam and Eve never read the Bible!! :eek: Neither did Noah, or Abraham and Sarah!! :eek: :eek: )
You are making a distinction that has nothing to do with faith. In fact creation is going to be destroyed by God, because it has become utterly sinfull. Therefore creation was created by God, but it is not of God. Satan is the principalities of the air.
 
You are making a distinction that has nothing to do with faith. In fact creation is going to be destroyed by God, because it has become utterly sinfull. Therefore creation was created by God, but it is not of God. Satan is the principalities of the air.
Are you a Gnostic? (Do you believe that material things are evil, or that when you die, your dead body will take your sins away with it, leaving a “pure” spiritual soul behind?)
 
This is where we disagree. In John 21:15-19, we Catholics see Jesus appointing Peter to be our first Pope. We then look at history and see that our line of Popes extends in an unbroken line all the way back to Peter. 🙂

Obviously, therefore, it is Jesus Christ who established the Catholic Church.

When we look at Protestantism and trace back their succession of leadership, we come to the end of the line when we reach various different men - Martin Luther (Lutherans, 1521), John Calvin (Dutch Reformed), John Knox (Presbyterian, 1560), Alexander Campbell (Disciples of Christ Christian), John Smythe (Baptist), and so on.
So then your faith is in the Pope?
 
This is an unbiblical statement. The Holy Spirit used sinfull man to write an infallable book. Are you saying that God can’t do that?
Sinful men who, if not for the Spirit, could have wrote fallible statement…hence they were fallible men.

Are you saying without the Spirit these men were infallible?
 
So, then, (opposite to Protestant belief, then) good works are important? Or is this only for Catholics? Protestants can go on sinning their little brains out, and still be “eternally saved,” but even one Catholic steps out of line even once, and that’s proof that it’s a false religion? 🤷
This is not opposite to Protestant beliefs. Works are important. I never said they were not. Protestant belief is that salvation is through Faith. Works are a neccessary result of that salvation. If anyone says they are save, but goes on “sinning their little brains out” then they are indeed not saved. I personally am called to do good works. Why would I go on sinning, when Christ gives me freedom from the bondage of sin. This passage says that you are either a good tre or a bad tree. How do you know which one you are? Read Galations 5. If we are a good tree, then we WILL have the fruits of the Spirit. If we are a bad tree, we WILL have the acts of sinfull nature. In other words, if you are a a good tree, I should be able to identify that by your works.
 
In other words, if you are a a good tree, I should be able to identify that by your works.
Isn’t part of that to be obedient to Christ in His Church, and to listen to the men that God has placed in leadership over His Church? (Is it possible to be truly obedient to Christ, while picking and choosing what to obey?)
 
Are you a Gnostic? (Do you believe that material things are evil, or that when you die, your dead body will take your sins away with it, leaving a “pure” spiritual soul behind?)
No I am not a Gnostic. I believe that the first sin corrupted all of creation, and thus will be destroyed with Satan. Revelations says that the old earth will pass away. The only way that I can escape this judgement, is to be righteous. Since the bible says that that is impossible, then I am not righteous. When I died to sin and became alive in Christ, the unrighteousness that is my soul was covered in the Blood of Jesus Christ. So on the day of my judgement, Christ’s righteousness will stand in place of mine.
 
This is not opposite to Protestant beliefs. Works are important. I never said they were not. Protestant belief is that salvation is through Faith. Works are a neccessary result of that salvation. If anyone says they are save, but goes on “sinning their little brains out” then they are indeed not saved. I personally am called to do good works. Why would I go on sinning, when Christ gives me freedom from the bondage of sin. This passage says that you are either a good tre or a bad tree. How do you know which one you are? Read Galations 5. If we are a good tree, then we WILL have the fruits of the Spirit. If we are a bad tree, we WILL have the acts of sinfull nature. In other words, if you are a a good tree, I should be able to identify that by your works.
So you believe that you can lose your salvation…curious…how does one who accepts Christ…then sin’s his brains out gain back his justification?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top