This forum seems to recycle the same blunt arguments between ‘once-saved-always-saved’ and ‘faith-and-works’ approaches to salvation over and over again. It seems to me like we’re just talking different languages, and making no effort to understand eachother.
So let’s have a go at a constructive understanding instead.
OK, so first of all, we probably need to define some terms.
In your own words, say who you are, what your theological viewpoint is, and then define any or all of the following words:
baptism
faith
grace
good works
salvation
righteousness
sanctification
Once we know what one another mean when we use these words, which I think mean very different things to different types of Christians, we might actually find that what we mean are very similar things, explained very differently.
Peace
Bridging the “Faith Alone” Divide
Catholics and Protestants disagree mightily on
the doctrine of justification. However, a closer look at
the concepts involved reveals that
the two sides are much closer in understanding than
the fireworks suggest.
To begin, Catholics accept three theological virtues: faith, hope & charity.
Faith is
the theological virtue by which we believe in God and believe all that he has said and revealed to us…because he is truth itself. (CCC 1814)
Hope is
the theological virtue by which we desire
the kingdom of heaven and eternal life as our happiness, placing our trust in Christ’s promises and relying not on our own strength, but on
the help of
the Holy Spirit. (CCC 1817)
Charity is
the theological virtue by which we love God above all things for his own sake, and our neighbor as ourselves for
the love of God. (CCC 1822)
In common Catholic usage, faith is unconditional belief in God, hope is unconditional trust in God, and charity is unconditional love for God.
The Catholic definition of faith (from
the Greek,
pistis) is derived from
the sense found in Romans 14 and James 2; namely, that “faith” means intellectual acceptance of a body of theological beliefs known collectively as “the faith”.
This definition is supported by scripture in three ways: 1)
the Romans 14 sense of
pistis is
the more common one in
the New Testament; 2)
the New Testament contains more than 40 references to “the faith”, so
the connection between
pistis and intellectual belief is very strong in this usage, and 3) this view of
pistis has
the advantage of maintaining
the distinction between faith and
the other two theological virtues and prevents blurring of their characteristics.
Viewing
the definitions given above, one will note
the similarities between
the Catholic virtue of hope and
the common Protestant definition of faith; that is, an unconditional trust in Jesus Christ and reliance on
the Holy Spirit instead of on one’s own strength. At
the same time, Protestants should have no problem accepting
the idea that faith—as they define it—must also contain
the intellectual assent to God that Catholics call faith since they should agree that a person with saving faith must believe whatever God says. Thus,
the Protestant idea of faith includes what Catholics call faith (intellectual assent) and what Catholics call hope (trust in God).
Further, if a Protestant accepts
the idea that saving faith is that which works in love (charity) as expressed in Galatians 5:6, then
the Protestant and Catholic positions are equivalent.
The reason is that a faith which works by charity produces acts of love. But a faith that produces acts of love is a faith that must include
the virtue of charity since
the virtue of charity is
the thing that enables us to perform acts of love in
the first place. Thus,
the Protestant idea of faith includes what Catholics call charity.
Putting this all together, we see
the following:
Protestant idea of faith = Catholic idea of faith + Catholic idea of hope + Catholic idea of charity
From this formula, we can see that Catholics rightly reject
the idea that one can be justified by intellectual belief only. So do Protestants. Misunderstandings occur when Catholics reject justification by “faith alone” according to their definition of faith while Protestants cling firmly to this doctrine according to their definition of faith.
Therefore, if Catholics and Protestants come to a mutual understanding of one another’s terminology and
the definitions of these terms, they can also agree on what does and does not constitute
the faith needed for justification. Justification by Faith Alone (or
sola fide) does not need to be a bitterly divisive issue separating Catholics and Protestants.
*Adapted from “*Justification: By ‘Faith Alone’?”
by James Akin.