A Disturbing Mass

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lisa44
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Only Protestants get dressed up for Church. And They stay all day some of them.
At Catholic Churches there’s a mad dash to the door.
Not at my Traditional Latin Mass parish. People make a thanksgiving afterwards for a while. Some stay for a half hour or longer.

When Catholics have the sensus fidei, the things the OP described do not happen and are not tolerated.
 
The whole band in the Sanctuary thing is SO troubling to me. It’s really reminiscent of an evangelical church, where the band “leads worship” and the pastor merely delivers the “message” and prays spontaneously. The whole service is set up like a concert. The people are there to be entertained.

This is not what Catholic Mass is about. The Mass is a sacrifice. We are there to prostrate our selves and make a sacrifice to God. In bastardized versions of the Mass like the one the OP experienced, as well as in evangelical services, the people are there to take from God, not give to Him. This so-called “worship” is merely self-serving mush. The band is in the front because people need a hook to keep them in church. There are no kneelers because apparently if we’re all “saved” we don’t need to throw ourselves at God’s feet.

OP, I’m so sorry that as a new convert, this is the type of Mass you are experiencing. Just know that this is liturgical abuse we’re talking about. This isn’t how it’s supposed to be. There are still priests who make efforts to keep the NO as traditional as possible by eliminating contemporary bologna and promoting a reverent, pious worship environment. If you’re going to attend an NO Mass, keep your ears peeled for Latin in the Mass (esp. the Kyrie, the Sanctus, and the Angus Dei). A priest who encourages the use of Latin in an English Mass is a priest you should stick with, imho.

Pax 😃
 
Why can’t the Pope keep the Mass on the straight and narrow? Is it really fair to say the Pope hates all the abuses of the Mass but yet they continue? If he wants them to stop why doesn’t he stop them? Why don’t the Bishops stop them?

Like, for instance, the Church can excommunicate the Society of St. Pius X and say its not a “valid Mass” or the Priests are not “validly ordained” or whatever the case may be.

Yet, all those Priests out there that are abusing the heck out of the Mass in every way immaginable they just…what? …get to continue doing that day after day?

Honestly, there is something strange going on don’t you think?
Hi, Lisa. I hope you will stay in the Church long enough to help us work toward reform of the reform. The Pope is working toward that too. But it is not his job to crack the whip and force Catholics to do right. That is not the way the Church works. And, of course, we want to work by the guidance of the Holy Spirit to do what the Lord wants us to do. I don’t believe the Lord expects us or the Pope to charge into a church with liturgical guns blazin’, as it were, forcing people to worship the right way or else.

That said, I have witnessed celebrations that alarmed me too. But I have also witnessed beautiful celebrations. I go to Mass up at EWTN every chance I get because I can count on them (and they are Franciscans too) to do things properly and with decorum and dignity.

But beautiful liturgy is not why I sought to be received into Holy Mother Church. And it won’t be why I leave, God forbid I should ever think of such a thing. We are Catholic because the Catholic Church is the Church founded by Christ and the Holy Spirit has called us to Himself. I hope you’ll help us in this work of liturgical reform. I feel strongly about it and we need more and more parishioners to get involved and learn what the Church actually teaches about liturgy, music and proper celebration.

Welcome home, Lisa. The Church on earth is not perfect, but it is only because we who are the Body of Christ still have a long way to go ourselves. What the Church needs is for her children to pray and study and work for her. If there are changes to be made, we have to do our part in bringing those changes about.
 
Thank you Hyacinth II - great talk.
And thanks Monica for your supportive words.🙂
🙂
The whole band in the Sanctuary thing is SO troubling to me. It’s really reminiscent of an evangelical church, where the band “leads worship” and the pastor merely delivers the “message” and prays spontaneously. The whole service is set up like a concert. The people are there to be entertained.

This is not what Catholic Mass is about. The Mass is a sacrifice. We are there to prostrate our selves and make a sacrifice to God. In bastardized versions of the Mass like the one the OP experienced, as well as in evangelical services, the people are there to take from God, not give to Him. This so-called “worship” is merely self-serving mush. The band is in the front because people need a hook to keep them in church. There are no kneelers because apparently if we’re all “saved” we don’t need to throw ourselves at God’s feet.

OP, I’m so sorry that as a new convert, this is the type of Mass you are experiencing. Just know that this is liturgical abuse we’re talking about. This isn’t how it’s supposed to be. There are still priests who make efforts to keep the NO as traditional as possible by eliminating contemporary bologna and promoting a reverent, pious worship environment. If you’re going to attend an NO Mass, keep your ears peeled for Latin in the Mass (esp. the Kyrie, the Sanctus, and the Angus Dei). A priest who encourages the use of Latin in an English Mass is a priest you should stick with, imho.

Pax 😃
I agree.

and yes any Latin in the Mass is a good sign! 🙂
 
Hang on everyone. This is the year of the Priest. I feel a revival coming. I heard Father Mitch talk about how to get more men to come to the priesthood. He said that when the people partake in Adoration of the Eucharist (he was talking about Benediction and visiting Jesus during the Exposition of Blessed Sacrament) then men begin to be called to the priesthood. As new priests are called, and taught the Latin Mass as an option, we will see it offered in our parishes as an option…maybe lets say, 9:00 Mass will be TLM and 10:30 will be NO…as an example…so that the needs of all parishiners are met.

I see this coming. I believe this is what our Holy Father is working towards. He is also working towards reuniting the Protestants with us as well as the Eastern Chuch. The Eastern church will join sooner of course, since we are much closer together already.

Let’s all make it a point to participate more in Adoration of Our Lord in the Blessed Sacrament…and watch the miracle unfold. Also, say the rosary, for our Blessed Mother is our greatest intercessor to her Son. He wants His church united.

God bless you all.
 
Why can’t the Pope keep the Mass on the straight and narrow? Is it really fair to say the Pope hates all the abuses of the Mass but yet they continue? If he wants them to stop why doesn’t he stop them? Why don’t the Bishops stop them?

Like, for instance, the Church can excommunicate the Society of St. Pius X and say its not a “valid Mass” or the Priests are not “validly ordained” or whatever the case may be.

Yet, all those Priests out there that are abusing the heck out of the Mass in every way immaginable they just…what? …get to continue doing that day after day?

Honestly, there is something strange going on don’t you think?
Lisa:

The Pope can’t go into every Diocese - It’s just NOT physically possible. So, He provides an Example (I’m sure you’ve seen his Masses on EWTN), he instructs the Bishops, & he deals with the absolute worst or most high profile cases… and, Sometimes, he replaces recalcitrant Bishops. There’s not much more Pope Benedict XVI can do unless he’s willing to risk another schism in the Church - The Liberals will probably leave if he pushes the issue much harder than he is.

The Catholic Church was taken WAY off course by the Liberals & the “SPIRIT OF VATICAN II”, and it’s probably going to take until the generation that did all these “INNOVATIONS” gives up the fight or dies before things will be able to return to an even keel.

Remember, things weren’t all that good before Vatican II - People were being crammed into Churches for hurried Liturgies that were scheduled every hour when they should have been scheduled every 1-1/2 or 2 hours, priests were bragging about “doing the Whole Liturgy” in 20 minutes, people weren’t receiving our Lord at all, and although the Religious Orders hid Jews, average Catholics (& average Christians), failed to actively resist Hitler. It wasn’t all rosy, and absence makes the heart grow fonder.

I know that’s not the whole story, but some here tend to see the past through rose colored glasses and the present through smog colored glasses… and, That’s just not wise or useful to the Lord.

Your Brother & Servant in Christ, Michael
 
Burning charity? Sounds as if you have an axe to grind there, josh.

It might behoove us all to pray for the removal of their suspensions instead of forever pointing out that their Masses are illicit, which is what you meant, I’m sure.

There are, however, no canonical penalties for attending their Masses.
ProVobis:

You don’t know what Josh meant or intended - Please, don’t assume what he meant.

The OP, Lisa44, needs to fulfill her Sunday Obligation, and won’t be able to do that attending an SSPX Mass. That’s a present, and sad, fact.

There are reverent OF Masses out there - I’ve found a parish where their Masses are pretty reverent - It was actually recommended to me by a priest who was doing the the EF’s in the L.A. area. Some OF’s are done in LATIN, and those are done reverently - I know one of the priests who started that trend. Most Dioceses now have EF’s in some parishes. It will take some work to find one of these, but the Mass will almost always be “done as to the Lord”. There are Catholic Churches in union with the Pope - Their Masses are almost always reverent, although Lisa might go through a bit of culture shock.

We need to suggest one of these alternatives to Lisa, rather than arguing about the SSPX or trying to send her to one of their Masses.

ProVobis, I don’t know what’s passed between you & Josh, but I do know that those who accuse others as you did in your post are usually guilty of the same things themselves… There’s the old saying about the pointed finger - The other three are pointed back at the accuser.

Your Brother & Servant in Christ, Michael
 
I’m terribly sorry that my wording offended you guys. That’s totally my fault. I didn’t mean it that way. I’m sorry if I’m mistaken in my statement too. Forgive me. I should have kept my mouth shut.
Josh:

NO reason for you to keep your mouth shut. You spoke the truth - the SSPX Masses are beautiful but illicit. It the same case with the TAC/ACA. After 14 years of Negotiations, they applied to His Holiness for Union with the Catholic Church. Because other Continuing Anglicans are seeking Communion/Union with His Holiness, Pope Benedict XVI & Cardinal Levada (yes, I said LEVADA) are trying to package the whole thing together so the whole bunch of Continuing Anglicans can come in together as ONE GROUP (Total of about 750,000):

ANGLICAN CHURCH IN AMERICA
acahomeorg0.web701.discountasp.net/
Facts regarding TAC’S Request for Unity with Rome
acahomeorg0.web701.discountasp.net/news/2008_06_20_tac_and_rome.aspx

As in the case of the SSPX, the Masses are beautiful (esp. the solemn High Masses) but illicit. Unlike the OF, the English is and the music are both beautiful, because no one has “Thrown out the baby with the bathwater”. Even with that, the Masses will be illicit until the Union/Communion is approved. and, I have to tell Catholics to make sure tey make their Sunday Obligations elsewhere before of after attending the TAC/ACA parish.

The only thing you need to work on is using the correct term - The SSPX Masses aren’t Illegal" - They’re “ILLICIT”. The Catholic Church isn’t a governing body like the UN wants to be. The Church is a Spiritual/Physical Union - A People, if you will. The Church can only say what Mass meets the Spiritual Need for Union/Communion with fellow Catholics. and, Until the SSPX obeys the dictates of the Pope and of the local Ordinaries, the SSPX doesn’t.

Your Brother & Servant in Christ, Michael
 
Lisa:

The Pope can’t go into every Diocese - It’s just NOT physically possible. So, He provides an Example (I’m sure you’ve seen his Masses on EWTN), he instructs the Bishops, & he deals with the absolute worst or most high profile cases… and, Sometimes, he replaces recalcitrant Bishops. There’s not much more Pope Benedict XVI can do unless he’s willing to risk another schism in the Church - The Liberals will probably leave if he pushes the issue much harder than he is.

The Catholic Church was taken WAY off course by the Liberals & the “SPIRIT OF VATICAN II”, and it’s probably going to take until the generation that did all these “INNOVATIONS” gives up the fight or dies before things will be able to return to an even keel.

Remember, things weren’t all that good before Vatican II - People were being crammed into Churches for hurried Liturgies that were scheduled every hour when they should have been scheduled every 1-1/2 or 2 hours, priests were bragging about “doing the Whole Liturgy” in 20 minutes, people weren’t receiving our Lord at all, and although the Religious Orders hid Jews, average Catholics (& average Christians), failed to actively resist Hitler. It wasn’t all rosy, and absence makes the heart grow fonder.

I know that’s not the whole story, but some here tend to see the past through rose colored glasses and the present through smog colored glasses… and, That’s just not wise or useful to the Lord.

Your Brother & Servant in Christ, Michael
Hi Michael,
Just an aside - but anti-semitism is alive and well. A few years ago Mein Kempf was on the best sellers list in Turkey. And, the church in Vat II is stating that the Muslims worship the God of Abraham. How is that a service to Judaism?

Regarding the mass. The Pope doesn’t really have to physically go to these churches. Why cannot he just exorcise his authority by simply compelling bishops to enforce the rubrics of the mass? How can anyone say it is out of their control and we must wait until the liberals pass over. Wait. Is liberalism going to die anytime soon? I doubt that very much.

I don’t know if the traditional mass was made illicit or not? But if it was never illicit, as I think, the church claims, then why was the SSPX disciplined for using it?

Its a total mystery to me a convert, how any Catholics could be punished for using a traditional Catholic Mass? Whereas, as a Catholic you can go to a NO mass with the liturgical abuses of your choice and consider yourself a “good” catholic.

I think the reason the SSPX is being held back is because of their rejection of Vat II and not because of the EF of the Mass. However, many people are looking at Vat II and not understanding it.

I really hope this can get ironed out sooner than later.
 
🙂 Michael, I tried to put a smiley face in my last post and it wouldn’t work so here’s a 🙂 for you.
 
Until the SSPX obeys the dictates of the Pope and of the local Ordinaries, the SSPX doesn’t.

Your Brother & Servant in Christ, Michael
Michael, thanks so much for clearing that up for us. Such a pleasure to read the words of one who has the insider’s knowledge. How long have you been directly involved with the negotiations between the Society and the Holy See?
 
Remember, things weren’t all that good before Vatican II - People were being crammed into Churches for hurried Liturgies that were scheduled every hour when they should have been scheduled every 1-1/2 or 2 hours, priests were bragging about “doing the Whole Liturgy” in 20 minutes, people weren’t receiving our Lord at all, and although the Religious Orders hid Jews, average Catholics (& average Christians), failed to actively resist Hitler. It wasn’t all rosy, and absence makes the heart grow fonder.

I know that’s not the whole story, but some here tend to see the past through rose colored glasses and the present through smog colored glasses… and, That’s just not wise or useful to the Lord.

Your Brother & Servant in Christ, Michael
There were problems before Vatican II but I don’t think they really compare to the Problems that have been happening in the Catholic Church since Vatican II. Christians failed to resist Hitler but we Christians of today have failed to resist the Left and their crime of mass murder, abortion.
 
Hi:)
I went to a Mass last weekend and it was so disturbing. It was in a very old church in a very old parish run by Fransiscans. My husband and I were very uncomfortable but I did stay the whole Mass. Firstly, there were no kneelers. Secondly, there was a band seated in the area (sorry, I’m a new convert I dont know the terms so bear with me…) at the back of the church behind the lecturn and infront of the tabernacle. The members of the band were very casually dressed. Most of the people in the church were extremely casually dressed to the point of seeing women with VERY low cut tops, mini skirts…jeans, shorts t-shirts…the works.

Anyways…before the Mass started the Priest formed a circle with those in the band up in the area mentioned above. The held hands and prayed together.
I can’t list everything that happened, mostly it was the usual things, a lot of singing and guitar playing and I can critique the Mass well as I am not knowledgable enough to know the various parts well. But it was like a typical ‘variation’ of the NO Mass.

Anyways, I just couldn’t wait for it to be over. At the very end, the Priest gave the (gold vessel with the Eucharist in it) to a female in the band behind him who was dressed in a SKIN TIGHT polyester shirt and pants. This lady then turned around to put the vessel into the tabernacle, and as she did so she leaned and bent over to reach to the tabernacle exposing her bottom in skin tight pale coloured pants to the whole congregation.

It was just such an obscene sight I just almost felt ill. It was really unbelievable.

Now, this is where I get REALLY angry. You know, as a new convert I’m told I must be SOOO obedient to the Pope and the church, and not even criticize it when the Pope says we worship together with the Muslims. And YET, what the HECK is going on in the Catholic Church??? IF it is supposed to be SOOO righteous and SOOO Holy then what in God’s name is going on? (I’m not using the Lords name in vain I mean what I said).

This makes me so mad and to be honest, it makes me really wonder if I shouldn’t convert to the Orthodox church. If Catholic Priests are allowing the Mass to degenerate into a total disgrace then I am ashamed to be called a Catholic.
Sounds like a group of crazy Franciscans to me!
Nowadays, please realize that people think nothing of the clothing they are wearing as to whether or not it might offend God or the congregations. Most do not have a clue anymore. It is plain ignorance, and they have not been taught any other way.
No one by the priest, altar servers and lecturer(s) should be in the altar area. A band has no business being up there.
If you are unhappy with that particular parish, find another. They are not all like that, believe me!
 
Hi Michael,
Just an aside - but anti-semitism is alive and well. A few years ago Mein Kempf was on the best sellers list in Turkey. And, the church in Vat II is stating that the Muslims worship the God of Abraham. How is that a service to Judaism?

Regarding the mass. The Pope doesn’t really have to physically go to these churches. Why cannot he just exorcise his authority by simply compelling bishops to enforce the rubrics of the mass? How can anyone say it is out of their control and we must wait until the liberals pass over. Wait. Is liberalism going to die anytime soon? I doubt that very much.

I don’t know if the traditional mass was made illicit or not? But if it was never illicit, as I think, the church claims, then why was the SSPX disciplined for using it?

Its a total mystery to me a convert, how any Catholics could be punished for using a traditional Catholic Mass? Whereas, as a Catholic you can go to a NO mass with the liturgical abuses of your choice and consider yourself a “good” catholic.

I think the reason the SSPX is being held back is because of their rejection of Vat II and not because of the EF of the Mass. However, many people are looking at Vat II and not understanding it.

I really hope this can get ironed out sooner than later.
Hi, Lisa. The SSPX folks haven’t been punished for using the traditional Latin Mass, not by Rome anyway. It is confusing and I can only offer you a little light on the matter. But it seems that there are folks who listen to Rome and try to do what the Church expects of them and stay in union with the Church. And then there are those who think that rebellion is the way to go. Using a traditional Latin Mass is not rebellion and Latin has never been suppressed by the Church, to my knowledge. However, refusing to abide by the Church’s teachings is rebellion. And that rebellion is what draws down the censure of Rome. Still Rome does not take a high-handed approach and try to whip people into line. That is not the way of the Church because it is not the way of her Lord.

It’s funny to me, but people outside the Church always talk about how authoritarian it is, with the Pope there to tell everybody what to do and think and how to act, but it isn’t that way at all. And then when we convert (yes, I’m a convert too), we bring with us all these ideas about how things should be. It takes a while to let go of that kind of thinking and to truly develop a Catholic worldview and a Catholic way of thinking. Believe me, it takes time, more than months and more than even a few years. I’ve been working at this for 15 years now, been Catholic for 13 years and feel like I am still beginning. Give yourself time, give yourself to prayer, study and reflection. And be patient. Rome does not act before she absolutely needs to and never without being absolutely sure the Holy Spirit is leading her to. Haste makes waste, you know. And when you’re responsible for people’s eternal souls, you don’t want to rush in and make terrible, tragic mistakes which have consequences far beyond those that are easily foreseen or imagined.

(It also helps to keep this in mind: a traditional Latin Mass is not necessarily the same thing as a traditionalist Latin Mass. Give yourself time to learn about these things too. And in the meantime, keep praying and attending Mass. Get involved in parish life and volunteer to help out in music and worship committees. But don’t forget to pray that the Holy Spirit uses you to do His will in His good time. Because what we want, ultimately, is what God wants. The rest is distraction and serves no one’s best interests but the enemy’s.) 🙂
 

I went to a Mass last weekend and it was so disturbing. It was in a very old church in a very old parish run by Fransiscans. My husband and I were very uncomfortable but I did stay the whole Mass. Firstly, there were no kneelers. Secondly, there was a band seated in the area (sorry, I’m a new convert I dont know the terms so bear with me…) at the back of the church behind the lecturn and infront of the tabernacle. The members of the band were very casually dressed. Most of the people in the church were extremely casually dressed to the point of seeing women with VERY low cut tops, mini skirts…jeans, shorts t-shirts…the works.​

Heel Cup
contact solution
 
Hi, Lisa. The SSPX folks haven’t been punished for using the traditional Latin Mass, not by Rome anyway. It is confusing and I can only offer you a little light on the matter. But it seems that there are folks who listen to Rome and try to do what the Church expects of them and stay in union with the Church. And then there are those who think that rebellion is the way to go. Using a traditional Latin Mass is not rebellion and Latin has never been suppressed by the Church, to my knowledge. However, refusing to abide by the Church’s teachings is rebellion. And that rebellion is what draws down the censure of Rome. Still Rome does not take a high-handed approach and try to whip people into line. That is not the way of the Church because it is not the way of her Lord.

Hi Disciple96,
You don’t think excommunication is a "high-handed’ approach?
Maybe the church doesn’t want to repeat the mistakes it made with the SSPX so it is not censuring the modernistic Priests who change the liturgy to suit themselves. Still, I hardly think continuing with tradition = inventing new liturgies, in terms of abuse. The SSPX seem less abusive to the faith then the modern innovators. But I could be wrong.

It’s funny to me, but people outside the Church always talk about how authoritarian it is, with the Pope there to tell everybody what to do and think and how to act, but it isn’t that way at all.

No?

And then when we convert (yes, I’m a convert too), we bring with us all these ideas about how things should be. It takes a while to let go of that kind of thinking and to truly develop a Catholic worldview and a Catholic way of thinking.

What is a Catholic worldview?

Believe me, it takes time, more than months and more than even a few years. I’ve been working at this for 15 years now, been Catholic for 13 years and feel like I am still beginning. Give yourself time, give yourself to prayer, study and reflection. And be patient. Rome does not act before she absolutely needs to and never without being absolutely sure the Holy Spirit is leading her to. Haste makes waste, you know. And when you’re responsible for people’s eternal souls, you don’t want to rush in and make terrible, tragic mistakes which have consequences far beyond those that are easily foreseen or imagined.

Indeed.

(It also helps to keep this in mind: a traditional Latin Mass is not necessarily the same thing as a traditionalist Latin Mass. Give yourself time to learn about these things too. And in the meantime, keep praying and attending Mass. Get involved in parish life and volunteer to help out in music and worship committees. But don’t forget to pray that the Holy Spirit uses you to do His will in His good time. Because what we want, ultimately, is what God wants. The rest is distraction and serves no one’s best interests but the enemy’s.

You lost me. Our parish has no music, which I am grateful for. There is another parish nearby that has many kinds of music played throughout the Mass but I prefer silence and there is too much hand holding and hand shaking for me.) 🙂
 
Why can’t the Pope keep the Mass on the straight and narrow? Is it really fair to say the Pope hates all the abuses of the Mass but yet they continue? If he wants them to stop why doesn’t he stop them? Why don’t the Bishops stop them?

Like, for instance, the Church can excommunicate the Society of St. Pius X and say its not a “valid Mass” or the Priests are not “validly ordained” or whatever the case may be.

Yet, all those Priests out there that are abusing the heck out of the Mass in every way immaginable they just…what? …get to continue doing that day after day?

Honestly, there is something strange going on don’t you think?
Why because the majority of Catholic clergy and laity don’t follow tradition anyway. You would loose about 75% of your church. Sad isn’t it. The damage is done!. And yes I do blame Vatican 2, and always will. Especially the clerics responsible for changing the Mass in the first place. The Council of Trent (Vatican 1) was the last official council in my book. It will take several Papacies before things turn right again. Provided they are all conservative and traditionally minded Popes. Even Padre Pio warned about the Council. The SSPX bishops have been “Un-Excommunicated” thanks to Pope Benedict XVI. You may want to start looking East!. This battle may extend to way beyond our lifetime.
 
Hi, Lisa44:

I don’t think of excommunication as any more high-handed than amputation of a limb. If the whole body may become infected and die because of a limb, then cut it off. It’s what Saint Paul recommended and it is not necessarily for the rest of his life, unlike amputation; it’s meant to get it through to the excommunicated one the seriousness of his situation and to show others that seriousness too.

Note that I have not suggested that we should tolerate abuses. But I do suggest that we act in, from and with charity (which does not equal squeamish cowardice and refusal to speak up either). I am not saying we should just let it slide, we should pray and work for reform. Also note that Popes do not excommunicate people willy nilly and not until they have been pushed very far indeed.

If you are asking “what is a Catholic worldview”, then you prove my point. Forming a Catholic mind takes years, not days, weeks or months. Formation of a Catholic conscience and view takes work, grace, sacraments, prayer and discipline. Becoming a Catholic is a lifelong process, not over after Confirmation and First Holy Communion. From your remarks, I get the impression that you haven’t been at it for long. (FYI, less than 10 years is not very long; more than 10 years is also not very long.)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top