Y
I think he’s right. if some deranged lunatic put a gun to my head under those circumstances, I’d say whatever I thought he wanted to hear without the least worry about my soul. the nut doesn’t have a right to ask that question or be entitled to the truth anyway.A gun is put to my head and I’m asked if I believe in God.
If I answer dishonestly, and say that I don’t believe in God, am I really denouncing my faith? In this video I talk about that question using a scenario based on the tragic Columbine High School shooting.
this was an issue in the early church after the persecution under Diocletian early 4th century. you might google “Donatist heresy” or check this wiki article on Donatism … en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DonatismI would like to say that I would not deny Christ, but I don’t know. That being said, I think that it would be wrong to deny Jesus because somebody had a gun to my head. That would be no different than denying Christ before any of the Roman magistrates during the early Church, and would, I think, be a sin. Now, you can argue for duress being a mitigating circumstance, but I would probably be haunted by thoughts of “did I deny Christ?” if I didn’t say I believed in God. Plus, if a person holds a gun to my head, I have a 50/50 chance of survival, so the odds are the same either way. They’re going to be crazy, and thus unpredictable in their reaction, so it is not correct, I think, to assume that denying God would save your life. Just my two cents.
How can we know for sure? That Peter’s denial did not thwart God’s plan, we know for sure, but it is possible that his affirmation of fidelity would not have had a different effect. Therefore, we cannot say what was likely or not.One way of looking at is to think about what would have happened if Peter had not denied Jesus, but had declared his fidelity instead. We would likely have had a different first Pope! In the end, those denials served a higher purpose.
I’ll be darned. Thanks for telling me that I was about to become a heretic!this was an issue in the early church after the persecution under Diocletian early 4th century. you might google “Donatist heresy” or check this wiki article on Donatism … en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donatism
the more forgiving side won out in the end.
F/
Peter had cut off the ear of the high priest’s servant, and Jesus restored the ear. Peter was confronted as to whether or not he was the one with Jesus earlier, by, among others, a relative of the one who was attacked by Peter. In denying it, I’ve always assumed Peter to have been exercising a self-preservation reflex, basically. I guess I doubt they were asking him at that point out of mere curiosity given the history. I think they had it in for him, but I could be wrong.How can we know for sure? That Peter’s denial did not thwart God’s plan, we know for sure, but it is possible that his affirmation of fidelity would not have had a different effect. Therefore, we cannot say what was likely or not.