Barnesy:
I dont think that sheperds expect the sheep to think for themselves. They must always do what they are told. If the sheperd says do this then they have no choice. If the sheperd says dont do that then they have no choice. Sheep do as they are told without thinking about it.
Well, the rule of context can always be applied in this case and while analogy can always be taken for the most negative qualities context is important, because surely you can see the importance of following a
good shepherd with the apparent
discipline of sheep? If the shepherd is perfectly good in understanding and action than being a sheep in this persons command is good. That is to say you should follow the good shepherd
like a sheep because the good shepherd will direct your life in what is righteousness and good, whereas by yourself according to your own command you will likely see your own destruction. But obviously this context assumes the existence of the good shepherd and that we have knowledge of this good shepherd. That’s why
context is so important.
Obviously a blind faith potentially has negative consequences. But we have to put our faith in someone since we do not know the why the what and the reason by ourselves. So we have to be careful to choose a good shepherd, someone that would be in a position to know the why the what and the reason, and that would require reasoning on our part, and i bet most people understand this regardless of any potential mistakes; not just Atheists.
That’s why i refuse to answers a certain individuals post because what they wrote about the Catholic was a cheap shot and fails to realise that we are all following what somebody thinks with varying degrees of justification for it. And being a sceptic for the sake of being sceptical is just a will to atheism, and is just as bad as a blind faith.