A Monster Calls: Any thoughts from Catholics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cherripeeps
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
C

Cherripeeps

Guest
Hello, friends.

Just recently, I went to watch A Monster Calls. If you need a little refresher, here’s the trailer:

youtube.com/watch?v=R2Xbo-irtBA

As you might have noticed, this is a bit of a didactic/self-help film that’s packed with symbolism, hidden meanings, and life lessons. Some of those ideas are interesting, but there are some themes in the movie that I find somewhat unsettling, and perhaps some implications in it might be at odds with the faith. What do you guys think? Is anyone willing to offer their thoughts on how the movie relates to Christianity, and/or Catholicism in particular?
 
I have not seen the movie but the trailer does show a lot of concepts which would be problematic. Destruction as a means to resolve problems, destruction of a church, the darkness of the cinematography, the focus on the tv as a portal into another world, calling on a being from another world (underworld) to come into this one, the dark context of that being, the concept that that being will save us, and what appears that the monster is causing harm to people in the school.

As I said, I haven’t seen the film, just from the clip you linked.

These themes are pretty generalized Hollywood fair. A dark message molded into a touching emotional story.

Thanks for brining it to our attention.
 
Howdy!

Wow, now that you mention all that, even at a first glance the movie does seem to be kind of dark.

I will try to put the trailer in context. If you haven’t seen it, beware: spoilers are coming.

The movie is about this kid named Connor who has to deal with a lot of difficulties in his life. His father is distant and irresponsible, his mother is dying from cancer, he’s bullied at school, and he has no one to help him find a way to make sense of all this.

Then one night, the monster appears. This monster is a scary but benign sort of super-ancient tree spirit, and his only goal is to help Connor come to grips with his reality and ultimately achieve healing.

That might help contextualize the red flags that we see in the trailer. Connor breaks things because he’s supposed be learning not to keep his frustration bottled up. The church crumbling to pieces is part of a nightmare that Connor is having, wherein the church’s falling debris open up a gaping hole in the adjacent graveyard; Connor’s mother is swallowed by this hole, symbolizing his fear that she will die soon. And that scene with the monster in the school is the part where he teaches Connor to defend himself from the local bullies.

That being said, I think there are some un-Christian themes being smuggled in along with the life lessons. For instance, the monster clearly is some sort of spiritual being and not simply part of Connor’s imagination; Connor and his mom are the only people who can see him. However, the monster seems to have no connection to God at all. He never makes any reference to God or Jesus or any of the truths of Christianity. And, though he is portrayed as being kind and just, he seems to regard himself as the ultimate standard of all justice and wisdom. There is no one above him, or at least no one whom the monster feels he should give credit to.

What’s most unsettling is that God is given no part in this story about growth and self-discovery. God is never even referred to directly. All the healing that takes place here is based on the monster teaching Connor some rather bland bits of worldly wisdom, such as the fact that humans are complex creatures and we often carry contradictions within us. (On occasion, these bits of wisdom take a relativist turn; the monster teaches Connor that nobody is really good or evil, but something in-between, and that is just the way it is. No allusion to the need to reject evil and seek holiness; just everyone’s moral mediocrity presented as a brute fact of life.)

Things get even murkier when one examines the few occasions in which Christian belief is explicitly alluded to. As mentioned earlier, the local church is destroyed in Connor’s nightmare for no good reason (the writer could’ve had anything else happen to kill Connor’s mom; but no, the church had to come crashing down). Later on, the monster tells the tale of an Anglican priest who 1) has no qualms about preaching to influence public opinion in favor of his own prejudices, 2) unknowingly ruins the life of an innocent man by preaching against him, and 3) abandons his faith when he believes circumstances warrant it. In fact, the monster gets Connor to help him destroy the priest’s house in order to teach him to channel his aggression. So, every time that Christianity is brought under the spotlight, it is negatively represented.

Not only that; the monster himself appears to bear witness against Christianity. He is designed to look like a humanoid tree, rooted to the earth, in stark and probably deliberate contrast to the Christian aspiration for things celestial. Further, the monster explains that he is destroying the priest’s house because he means to punish him for being “a man of faith without faith.” If the monster believed in the Christian God at all, here he might’ve said, “a man of faith who turns his back on God,” or something like that. Instead, what fuels the monster’s anger is simply the priest’s hipocrisy and lack of conviction. Given the cold treatment that Christianity receives throughout the rest of the movie, I think it’s safe to assume that, as a spiritual being himself, the monster “knows” for a fact that the real God is not the God that Christians believe in. So, then, here we have some subtle signs that the monster as a character is essentially a mouthpiece for buddhist or deist or New-Agey beliefs. Maybe a blend of all three.

Lastly, I think there’s something wrong with this running theme of aggression and destruction being seen as positive and even therapeutic throughout the movie. Sure, there’s a rightful place for such things in life; Jesus resorted to aggression when He unleashed His righteous fury against the merchants who’d taken over the Temple. However, there’s a difference between that and actually breaking somebody’s windows because “it feels good” (the monster’s words) and you feel the person deserves it. A truly positive way to channel Connor’s bottled-up energy might’ve been to reach out to the broader community and to use his strength and his hands to help all the people who were even worse off than he was. Getting exhausted helping others feels good, too, but in a less self-indulgent sort of way.

In short… A Monster Calls is basically a high-budget postmodern parable teaching people how to live an acceptably happy life built on relativistic worldly insights and a pleasant, fuzzy belief that “there’s something out there” in the spiritual realm; fortunately, one can rest easy knowing that this something is completely unrelated to the prejudiced, breakable, man-made Christian Church.

And now I understand why this film was so troubling to me on an intuitive level when I first watched it. Hmm.

Anyway – I apologize for the essay, everybody. I hope somebody out there can find it useful or at least interesting. Of course, further thoughts are always welcome.
 
I thought it was great. OP, I guess I can see where you drew those conclusions from what you saw, though that’s not what I took from it. I didn’t think there was anything anti-Christian; it’s just wasn’t addressed for the most part. While I too wish movies presented a Christian worldview, I guess I stopped expecting that long ago, so I don’t count it as a knock against the film.

I did not understand the creature to be real at all. I thought it was a dramatic and visually impressive telling of how people mentally work through problems. I think it changes the takeaways when the creature is only in your mind. I haven’t actually read any analysis of the movie (or interviews with the writer), so I may well be wrong about that. But in many scenes (esp. in the lunchroom), it’s clear that what first appears to be done by the monster is actually done only by the boy.
I have not seen the movie but the trailer does show a lot of concepts which would be problematic. Destruction as a means to resolve problems, destruction of a church, the darkness of the cinematography, the focus on the tv as a portal into another world, calling on a being from another world (underworld) to come into this one, the dark context of that being, the concept that that being will save us, and what appears that the monster is causing harm to people in the school.
Hmm, I’m not sure most of those themes actually exist in the movie. I guess I can see how the trailer might make you think that, but trailers often misrepresent the film. The TV was just someone watching old home videos of the main characters (and a film device so you can see how their relationship was in its formative years); it’s not a “portal into another world.”
 
@Wampa

Oh, interesting! Thanks for your perspective.

Hmm. Well, if I may, here’s my case for why the monster cannot be simply imaginary: If he were, we would have to resign ourselves to Connor being the only character who can see him. However, he isn’t; Connor’s mother is also privy to the monster’s ‘apparitions.’ You can notice that if you pay attention. Throughout, she’ll occasionally drop a mysterious comment along the lines of, “That tree is our friend.” Then, as she lies in her deathbed, there is this moment in which she and the monster appear to be exchanging wistful looks, and we wonder if they are gazing at each other, or she simply happens to be staring in his direction while still unable to see him. But at the very end, we see her sketchbook from when she was about Connor’s age, and we see that she drew herself sitting on the monster’s shoulder. So I think the film wants us to infer that she and the monster were friends when she was a child.

About your comment about the absence of Christianity in the movie… I suppose one might give the film the benefit of the doubt and assume that it was not deliberately trying to represent the faith in a demeaning light. In my opinion, one has to be really charitable to look at it that way, considering how negatively the Church is portrayed in the rare instances where it is mentioned. But, at the very least I guess it’s a possible interpretation.
 
I did certainly see all the signs that she saw the monster, too, but I did not take that to mean that he’s literally real as a living monster. I thought it was a creative way of saying that we all have mental processes we go through, both he and his mother. There were just too many other scenes where we saw the monster do something, but then were shown that that thing did not happen (the lunchroom, the church, the hole in the ground). I will have to think about it some more.

The entire movie was done in a very fantasy-driven manner, so that it’s never quite clear exactly what’s real and what’s in the boy’s mind. Since he and his mother both had similar creative aptitudes, they both may have dealt with their issues in a similar way, which is represented graphically in the movie as the monster.

I did some googling to see if I could come up with a definitive explanation re the final scene (like an interview with the director), but I couldn’t find anything.
 
Mm. It IS true that the movie itself goes out of its way to be ambiguous as a general theme. It constantly blends imagination, illusion, and reality.

However, I’d insist on the monster being a real, objective reality due to the insights that he communicates to the boy. He tells stories that challenge and subvert Connor’s expectations at every turn. Thus, Connor could not have come up with them on his own, no matter how creative his subconscious may be. These stories are not rehashes of old material that he already has in his own mental archives; they are altogether new, perplexing, fresh material that must have come from outside of him.

In fact, I’d argue that the monster having a far superior wisdom is a key point in the movie genre: someone who is young and immature meets someone who is much older and wiser, and the wiser person teaches the young one how to live life better. Think of that big expository scene at the end, where Connor finally confronts his nightmare, and the monster rambles on and on about human nature and harsh truths of life and so forth. The monster is supposed to represent some repository of deep, ancient wisdom, from whom Connor benefits by learning some of that wisdom.
 
Not owning a television, I’m completely oblivious and ignorant of film previews and commercials, but judging by the trailer it looks like a fun movie. I can’t comment on whatever Catholic themes there may or may not be, but it reminded me a bit of Iron Giant, which I thought was pretty great. I’ll definitely watch this when I get a chance. (When it comes to Netflix, in other words.) Thanks for posting the trailer, because I would never have heard of this otherwise.
 
Cherripeeps, all good points! I’m still hoping to spend some more time digging into some online analysis of the movie (I always try to find director/writer interviews, as that gives the most solid data).

I did see one person online positing that the monster is the spirit of his grandfather (and her father), which would make some sense. It would explain the wisdom/knowledge, without the monster having to be “real” in the physical sense (all of the fantastical scenes can be mental things that the spirit takes the boy through). It would also explain why those two specific people see him and not other people.

I will continue to think about this one. Which is always the sign of a good movie!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top