No, I’m not Catholic. But my understanding of Scripture is MUCH closer to Catholic than it is to Reformed.
Hi!
…yeah, you through me for a spin (I read all post of the threads I join)… I wondered why you did not disclose the Faith… I thought… another bashful Catholic…
…then you juiced it up… I recognized a fervor that was past most Catholics…
…then the format demonstrated not quite Catholic… but I was glad to see you engaging the Word with so high fervor!
Do you agree that all three views of “OSAS”, are really only repeating what satan told Eve in the Garden? "Don’t worry, you won’t really die."
…you’re the first person that has openly placed it in those terms… but, in my estimation as well, it is true… it’s the false teaching that God is in error and/or that man can disobey God and yet compel Him to grant him Salvation regardless of his determination to remain unrighteous and to reject God’s Authority. :banghead::banghead::banghead:
You are very honorable. No two people on Earth will agree on everything; the key is to tolerate
difference, celebrate agreement, and fellowship together looking for the time when there will BE no differences in theology; for Jesus will return, and we will all be one in His presence.
…I say “celebrate agreement and tolerate differences”, with consideration of the fact that we actually have words written by Matthew, Mark, Luke, Peter, James, Jude, and so much by Paul. Did you see what I said about Calvinism and 1Cor2:14? In A. W. Pink’s book, “The Sovereignty of God” (I think page 98), in R. C. Sproul’s “Chosen by God”, and in most any other RT text, they clearly state "1Cor2:14 proves that
unregenerate men cannot believe and be saved; their hearts must be changed by God FIRST."
But it’s not just a discussion between them, and me, and you;
we really can reach back in time and bring PAUL solidly into the discussion. And Paul says in 1Cor2:12 that we must
receive the Spirit IN ORDER TO GET the “things” that natural men do not understand. There are only a few possibilities for the passage:
- An unbelieving unrepentant sinner receives the Spirit (He indwells their sin!)
- There are two kinds of “receive”, one superficial (without belief) and one indwelling
- The “THINGS” in verses 9-14 are the deeper things of the Spirit that are given to the SAVED
Number one is silly; the Spirit will not indwell someone who is unrepentant.
Number two is equally silly; Scripture only teaches ONE “lambano-receive”, it’s after belief (Acts11:17).
Number three is the only possibility. We have to be saved in order to receive the Spirit, only THEN are those “things” taught. (That fits Matt13, “to he who HAS [salvation!], more is given [deeper things, parable explanations!]”.) The passage only says that natural men HAVE not believed, in no sense can the Reformed position of “they-cannot-believe” continue.
Do you see the dynamic, Jcrichton? When we can show what the Apostles wrote
solidly reflects one particular view, then it’s not valid for anyone to “just agree to disagree”
and walk away when they are in fact opposing what the Apostles wrote. All the Reformed books have to have 1Cor2:14 removed, unless they can come up with a #4 to explain verse 12.
…the problem is that man tends to elevate things… (ego trips trip our attempt to clarify things); in a way they are correct… but only slightly… Jesus tells us that no one can come to Him unless the Father sends them… where they go wrong is by ignoring the fact that God wants all to be Saved so it is inherently given to man to seek God… this of course does not mean that all men will want to seek God (St. John 3:14-21); still, God does not work on the heart of unbelievers… that would negate free-will! God can only work on man once he willingly submits to God’s Fellowship.
I see that what I said was inadequate. To be clear — you are ABSOLUTELY RIGHT
that “man must cooperate with God’s grace”.
I like Robertson, whose commentaries are usually right (I’ve found him wrong in only a couple places). On Eph2:8, A.T.Robertson says “Grace is God’s part, faith is ours”.
Did you see my comment on Rom1:17? Going to Greek, “ek pistew ei pistin” — from faith-the-start, to faith-the-goal; literally from beginning faith to ending faith. We choose both how our faith begins, and how it ends. Thus, Jude’s “building yourselves in holy faith” (20, and 21 “keep yourselves in His love”), Paul’s “having begun in the Spirit are you ending in the flesh?” (Gal3:3), and “he who endures to the end shall be saved” (Jesus!), and others!
…it seems we were right on the same target… but an expression (that usually follows a conviction narrative liken to the Mormons’ bait and switch tactics seem to have popped up)… you were not inadequate, just curt… so I wanted to give you the opportunity to expand–both for my benefit and that of the thread.
Forgive me for not being clearer. You see you and I are more in agreement than not.
Nooooo, you and I agree with SCRIPTURE.
…and that is the beginning of personal agreement between Christians; engaging the Word of God with the same end… building the Body of Christ!
Maran atha!
Angel