A Question for Agnostics and OR Atheist

  • Thread starter Thread starter PJM
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
James Randi foundation applies the same scientific processes we use for looking at any claim that people make, natural or supernatural claims. Present your proposal to it or if you don’t want to take on their challenge, point out where they are mistaken in the process and they will correct it. But that means you’d be coming up with a better version of the scientific process for studying reality and who knows, you might win a nobel for that new process for making science better. Just dismissing it without actually looking at it seems petty. It’s easily googleable to find out their process for analysis of the mystical claims people are making. I’ll just conclude this point here and move on since you clearly dismissed it without looking into their process, which is only the scientific process, of analysis at all.
Russell_SA, here’s your chance to get rich:)

So my friend USE there process to DISPROVE what I have shared:)

Send them my post for the Evidences of GOD and should they fail to be able to scientifically disprove I assume, any of it, you win the $$$$$$ MEGA BUCKS
Could you define what you mean by “soul”. I really have no idea what this is in any clear sense.
Russell, Here is Father Hardon’s Catholic Dictionary definition:

SOUL. The spiritual immortal part in human beings that animates their body. Though a substance in itself, the soul is naturally ordained toward a body; separated, it is an “incomplete” substance. The soul has no parts, it is therefore simple, but it is not without accidents. The faculties are its proper accidents. Every experience adds to its accidental form. It is individually created for each person by God and infused into the body at the time of human insemination. It is moreover created in respect to the body it will inform, so that the substance of bodily features and of mental characteristics insofar as they depend on organic functions is safeguarded. As a simple and spiritual substance, the soul cannot die. Yet it is not the total human nature, since a human person is composed of body animated by the soul. In philosophy, animals and plants are also said to have souls, which operate as sensitive and vegetative principles of life. Unlike the human spirit, these souls are perishable. The rational soul contains all the powers of the two other souls and is the origin of the sensitive and vegetative functions in the human being

I will add to this some of my own thoughts so that you don’t think all I do s copy and paste.

EVERY living “thing” has a “soul” which I understand to be that which animates all life forms. But just as the plant an animal kingdoms have a hierarchy; so too do “souls”.

Just as humanity is the pinnacle of the human chain; the human Soul holds the top position in complexity and merit in the “soul-chain.” It is NOT coincidental and is the direct result of the exclusively of humanity and humanities exclusive God GIFTED mind, intellect and freewill; which makes ONLY man a Rational being; and ONLY man’s Soul as possessing all that is essential to be “rational.”

WHY is this so:

Catholics [and even Old Testament Jews believed in an after life with God [though not precisely in the identical manner]

Because the human body corrupts upon death; there has to be something of that HUMAN & ONLY in humanity] person to face the consequences of their Life choices [Isaiah 43: 7, 21] a Final Judgment [but I get ahead of myself here]😊

What remains is the Human SOUL with it’s SPIRITUAL “Other self” of the mind, intellect and freewill still and permanently attached to it.
Again, last time I’m addressing this, belief is not a choice
Russell my friend; I am not trying to be argumentative here… But I am unable to comprehend your position as stated.

From a Christian perspective:
“belief” stems from God’s OFFER of His Grace. [its the only possibility]

That “OFFER” can be rejected, accepted in part, or totally accepted; hence it is a CHOICE:shrug:

Further as I indicated in a prior choice where you claimed choice was not possible; and series of choices one COULD have made in your example of the chair and sitting.
It can be changed once you are convinced about a new understanding of the event you experienced, but your initial belief is what you concluded about the event. That’s really all it is.
See that’s where we disagree

Your premise seems to hold that what ever one is TOLD or exposed to MUST in an absolute sense be accepted without thought or consideration; where I hold to the position that ANY belief must first be accepted by the mind, intellect and FREEWILL; making such a choice.
It’s your currently held understanding about the event. New information can either reinforce your belief about it, like testing gravity again and again, or it can change the results to a new belief about the event. But your conclusion is not a choice you make. Look at a blue shirt and choose to believe it’s red. You can’t. No one can.
EXACTLY; BUT that still requires a CHOICE to believe or NOT to believe the data. And yes one’s understanding can be changed based on new or additional data.
Since we do not understand how the governing physical laws of the universe came about for our universe, yet, no one is justified in their claims about how they came about.]
No My FRIEND; that’s a “cop-out”
It does not take ANY scientific evidence to PROVE that their HAS to be, HAD to be a FIRST CAUSE.
An essential First Cause s the only LOGICAL, moral and feasible possibility.; denial of this reality is illogical.
SEE NEXT POST FOR THE BALANCE OF MY REPLY
 
CONTINUED FROM ABOVE POST
So further questions about areas beyond our current ability to investigate will be answered with, “I don’t know, and I don’t see how you could either.” I can make up an imagined entity too that could have the power to do it as well, but does that mean the blue genie with Robin William’s voice actually is the answer? It may be, but since we can’t tell the difference between the genie actually existing and it not existing, we are at an impasse and must conclude, tentatively “we don’t know yet”. If premise A can have multiple conclusions and we can not eliminate them down to one, then we are stuck at leaving them all on the table.
Russell, I’m disappointed in your position here. I’ve answered ALL of the questions YOU have asked and your evading answering mine only because you do not have a OBJECTIVELY true response. man has had at least 4,000 YEARS to discover it; we have sent a mna to the MOON and back, so your argument seems exceedingly weak.

Truth can be nothing other than singular per defined issue.

You requested EVIDENCE of God which I and Thomas Aquinas HAVE SUPPLIED.

My FRIEND, you would do well to be honest with yourself. If your NOT going to be open to THEE TRUTH; then we are wasting each others time:

Father Hardon, a friend and former mentor of mine has this to say about truth:
“TRUTH IS THE CONDITION OF GRACE; IT IS THE SOURCE OF GRACE; IT IS THE CHANEL OF GRACE; IT IS THE DIVINELY ORDAINED REQUIREMENT OF GRACE”

Right understanding CAN ONLY come through God’s accepted OFFER of His Grace.

BENEDICT XVI
Benedict says: “If we omit the truth, what do we do anything for?”

& “There cannot be your truth and MY truth or their would be NO truth”

Ps.145:18 “
.
[18] The LORD is near to all who call upon him,
to all who call upon him in truth.

**Dictionary Definition of “Truth”
  1. The true or actual state of a matter:
    conformity with fact or reality; verity: the truth of a statement
  2. a verified or indisputable fact, proposition, principle, or the like mathematical truths.
  3. the state or character of being true.
  4. actuality or actual existence.
  5. an obvious or accepted fact; truism; platitude.
  6. honesty; integrity; truthfulness.
  7. (often initial capital letter) ideal or fundamental reality apart from and
    transcending perceived experience:
  8. agreement with a standard or original.
    9… accuracy, as of position or adjustment.
  9. Archaic. Fidelity or constancy.**
In Georges Bernanos’ Diary of a Country Priest, the elderly Curé de Torcy gives his young priest friend a bit of advice about proclaiming the Gospel: “The Word of God is a red-hot iron,” he says. “Truth is meant to save you first, and the comfort comes later.”

John.8 Verses 43 to 47: “Why do you not understand what I say? It is because you cannot bear to hear my word. You are of your father the devil, and your will is to do your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, and has nothing to do with the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks according to his own nature, for he is a liar and the father of lies.

John 1 :17 “because while the law was given through Moses, grace and truth came through Jesus Christ”

2 Cor. 13: “8 For we cannot do anything against the truth, but only for the truth.”

John 8: 31-32 ”Jesus then said to the Jews who had believed in him, “If you continue in my word, you are truly my disciples, and you will know the truth, and the truth will make you free.”

*Gal. 2: “5 to them we did not yield submission even for a moment, that the truth of the gospel might be preserved for you.”

2 John 8-9 Anyone who is so “progressive” as not to remain in the teaching of the Christ does not have God; whoever remains in the teaching has the Father and the Son

John 14: 16-17 And I will pray the Father, and he will give you another Counselor, to be with you forever, even the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive, because it neither sees him nor knows him; you know him, for he dwells with you, and will be in you.

John 14: “6 Jesus said to him, "I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father, but by me.”
Morality, it seems to me, emerges from conscious creatures that are forced to interact with each other. It’s an emergent property of the brain with socialization as feedback to it. Good and bad are subjective to someone’s best understood reference point of good and bad in reference to the situation and their ability to assess the situations.
OK:o Let’s presume your completely correct here [you’re not] BUT

THAT level of complexity is possible HOW? [please don’t tell me evolution] it existed in the very earliest man.

My friend If this is how your going to respond to ALL of the points I shared; your kidding yourself and avoiding the OBVIOUS and EVIDENT Truths:shrug:

God Bless you,

**THIS WEEK END KAREN AND I ARE CELEBRATING OUR 50TH WEDDING ANNIVERSARY AND OUR SON FLEW IN FROM FLORIDA, SO I MAY NOT HAVE TIME FOR A FEW DAYS TO RESPOND FURTHER.

KNOW THOUGH THAT YOUR IN MY THOUGHT AND PRAYERS AND THAT I WILL GET BACK TO YOU

GOD BLESS,
PATRICK**
 
undead rat;14675254:
For our Atheists and Agnostics the universe is entirely a material thing and can be explained by the laws of physics and chemistry. For them there will always be a rational explanation for the events that the religious community calls miracles.
Not all atheists are physicalists. You can be an atheist and be a platonist, or believe in supernatural things that aren’t divine.

And what am I to do with this information? If I’m trying to be rational, I have to base my beliefs on the evidence as best I can. When I do that, the existence of God seems pretty remote to me. And the existence of my “eternal soul.” And a God who has set up reality in such a way as to make there be negative consequences for my eternal soul based on something like my honest disbelief in this God (especially if the consequences are something like an eternity in hell) seems to be so remote that it barely seems worth considering.
You may also watch the Youtube video which debates about Does God Exist?
youtube.com/watch?v=RQADiuyPV80
 
FRIEND,

Does not Jesus EXPECT his Catholics to be charitable 🤷

God Bless you
I am being charitable…I could have said something worse!

These long winded discussions are impossible to follow…I’ll be leaving…God Bless you, also.
 
undead rat;14675254:
For our Atheists and Agnostics the universe is entirely a material thing and can be explained by the laws of physics and chemistry. For them there will always be a rational explanation for the events that the religious community calls miracles.
Not all atheists are physicalists. You can be an atheist and be a platonist, or believe in supernatural things that aren’t divine.

And what am I to do with this information? If I’m trying to be rational, I have to base my beliefs on the evidence as best I can. When I do that, the existence of God seems pretty remote to me. And the existence of my “eternal soul.” And a God who has set up reality in such a way as to make there be negative consequences for my eternal soul based on something like my honest disbelief in this God (especially if the consequences are something like an eternity in hell) seems to be so remote that it barely seems worth considering.
You may also watch the Youtube video which debates about Does God Exist?
youtube.com/watch?v=RQADiuyPV80

How can atheism cannot exist if there was no God. In other words, can you oppose something which doesn’t exist? There is no science without God. If man evolved from apes? How come apes still exist? Did evolution of woman also happened the same way? Many theories keep changing based on the discoveries made everyday. If science has answers for everything, there won’t be something called Paranormal or Supernatural which science cannot explain. While we (Christians) always have place for science, I wonder why it is soo difficult for atheist to accept God who is the ultimate creator 🤷
 
KnowtheSilence;14677918:
You may also watch the Youtube video which debates about Does God Exist?
youtube.com/watch?v=RQADiuyPV80
How can atheism cannot exist if there was no God. In other words, can you oppose something which doesn’t exist? There is no science without God. If man evolved from apes? How come apes still exist? Did evolution of woman also happened the same way? Many theories keep changing based on the discoveries made everyday. If science has answers for everything, there won’t be something called Paranormal or Supernatural which science cannot explain. While we (Christians) always have place for science, I wonder why it is soo difficult for atheist to accept God who is the ultimate creator 🤷

Exactly!
Ask an atheist if he or she is afraid of dying? Ask them what happens after one dies?

Not one atheist has ever given me a solid -compelling explanation how life just happened come to existence from nothing. There must have been a purpose for it. All living creatures on earth posses a purpose.
 
“So god is just the first cause of the universe? Fine, I’ll call it, ‘We don’t know yet’.”

The thought is that no matter what you find out about the origin of the universe there will always be something before it that caused it. Always, and always and always forever. You will never get to the beginning if you continue to look for a material (same as energy) beginning. You will never see the beginning from within. The beginning must come from without.
 
Nice side-stepping. God of gaps? Why? Atheists are the ones constantly asking for proof? Again, kindly prove to me the purpose of the universe?
What ever you want it to be. Just like any other thing in your life. BTW - why would an the universe owe you a meaning anyways?
 
I beg your pardon? Who mentioned anything about being owed purpose? You did, not I. So in other words, in the world of atheism, there is no purpose? Again, we appeared out-of-nothing for no purpose?

You are the atheist, it seems you are the ones seeking proof about everything.
If something does not exist, why even bother to contemplate it?
Yes that is exactly all the evidence shows. Just because the evidence doesn’t show you what you want, doesn’t mean you get to invent a reality you want.
 
Yes that is exactly all the evidence shows. Just because the evidence doesn’t show you what you want, doesn’t mean you get to invent a reality you want.
Do you also require the rejection of the “invented realities” of the brilliant minds of the 20th century that envisioned the wave, particle or reaction before they reasonably proved its existence?

👍

With your approach, the trajectory of knowledge grinds to a halt as whatsoever is discovered in often imagined before it is found.

Obviously this sometimes doesn’t pan out. There’s every rational reason to believe in aliens from another planet. But so far, no dice. Fermi paradox, is it?
 
Yes that is exactly all the evidence shows. Just because the evidence doesn’t show you what you want, doesn’t mean you get to invent a reality you want.
:ehh: Evidence shows…what?

What I want? It is not what I want, but moreover, what is presented. I have the option of taking it or leaving it. Invent a reality? I am not sure what you mean by “invent” reality?
 
What ever you want it to be. Just like any other thing in your life. BTW - why would an the universe owe you a meaning anyways?
Whatever I want it to be? Interesting. There you go again with being owed something? Explain the correlation between purpose and being “owed” something by the universe?

So by your response, the world of atheism has no purpose? Wow! So every living creature which exists or has existed has no purpose at all?
 
Could you define what you mean the label, “god” or “deity” first though before I get to your points of evidence you presented for why it should be there at all.
,
god and God , as was deity were explained on POST #120

As to WHY we exist:

The bibles book of Isaiah; chapter 43; verses 7 & 21

Isa.43: [7] every one who is called by my name, whom I created for my glory, whom I formed and made." & [21] the people whom I formed for myself that they might declare my praise. [its our choice! and right now you seem to be failing miserably… BUT their is still time for you to repent, be logical and convert]
 
Whatever I want it to be? Interesting. There you go again with being owed something? Explain the correlation between purpose and being “owed” something by the universe?

So by your response, the world of atheism has no purpose? Wow! So every living creature which exists or has existed has no purpose at all?
They make the purpose for themselves as we all do.
 
,
god and God , as was deity were explained on POST #120

As to WHY we exist:

The bibles book of Isaiah; chapter 43; verses 7 & 21

Isa.43: [7] every one who is called by my name, whom I created for my glory, whom I formed and made." & [21] the people whom I formed for myself that they might declare my praise. [its our choice! and right now you seem to be failing miserably… BUT their is still time for you to repent, be logical and convert]
The Robin William’s genie say, “Al a ka zam” and stuff appeared. Does that make it actually so as well? On the third scratch by the lip of the lamp, it statith - rub me and all your desires come true. Does that actually make it so? There’s all these writers in the holly land of hollywood that wrote this down as well. Did that actually make it so? I can assert just as much about your deity as I can about this genie and we still can’t actually tell a difference between the two can we?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top