A
AlbertBall
Guest
Ok, a quick question.
If evolution is not true then why has no creationist ever been able to find one animal that breaks the nested hierarchies?
In fact furthermore, why don’t you go and find an animal that violates the hierarchies?
I would just like to address one response to save time. The classification system is based on the work of a creationist who lived before Darwin. So the animals were NOT classified by those that accept evolution
Can any answers please address the above, i don’t want to see this thread turn into the usual evolution/creation trash talking sessions. I would just like a straightforward answer to a straightforward question.
If evolution is not true then why has no creationist ever been able to find one animal that breaks the nested hierarchies?
In fact furthermore, why don’t you go and find an animal that violates the hierarchies?
I would just like to address one response to save time. The classification system is based on the work of a creationist who lived before Darwin. So the animals were NOT classified by those that accept evolution
Can any answers please address the above, i don’t want to see this thread turn into the usual evolution/creation trash talking sessions. I would just like a straightforward answer to a straightforward question.