A Question for Lutherans - One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic

  • Thread starter Thread starter christus_vincit
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Regarding the ethical and anthropological issues of female clergy and gay clergy among some Lutherans. The Church of Sweden began ordaining women priests last century; now I believe, most Lutherans in Europe have female clergy as well as the ELCA and Lutheran Church of Canada. The Dialogue of Lutherans and Catholics acknowledges the practice and yet both signed the Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification in 1999. The Lutheran and Catholic Commission on Unity issued the ecumenical statement ‘From Conflict to Communion’ last year; well after some Lutherans began blessing same-sex marriages.

How does one explain this?
 
Obviously the
Pope isn’t going to water board the transgressors.
Fooey! I was hoping for a modern auto de fe. 🙂
So now in your statement- WHO admonishes the
sinner and WHO breaks communion? WHO has the
authority to do that?
The church has that authority, because it proclaims the gospel.
 
Regarding the ethical and anthropological issues of female clergy and gay clergy among some Lutherans. The Church of Sweden began ordaining women priests last century; now I believe, most Lutherans in Europe have female clergy as well as the ELCA and Lutheran Church of Canada. The Dialogue of Lutherans and Catholics acknowledges the practice and yet both signed the Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification in 1999. The Lutheran and Catholic Commission on Unity issued the ecumenical statement ‘From Conflict to Communion’ last year; well after some Lutherans began blessing same-sex marriages.

How does one explain this?
These are merely one or two points of agreement on an ongoing dialogue, which, unfortunately to me, seem to be meaningless in the large scheme of things. By the time the declarations are hashed out and words parsed toward any concrete action, the more traditionally minded of the Lutherans would have split off into a less liberal community and/or the liberals would have progressed their way out of the agreement by watering down the meaning of each word and ordaining and blessing everyone to be inclusive. See Anglican Dialogues to more info. At least the agreements today can be the framework for a future welcoming to the Catholic Church for the traditional remnant of Lutherans, perhaps by way of ordinariate or prelature, or even into the Anglican Ordinariate.
 
These are merely one or two points of agreement on an ongoing dialogue, which, unfortunately to me, seem to be meaningless in the large scheme of things. By the time the declarations are hashed out and words parsed toward any concrete action, the more traditionally minded of the Lutherans would have split off into a less liberal community and/or the liberals would have progressed their way out of the agreement by watering down the meaning of each word and ordaining and blessing everyone to be inclusive. See Anglican Dialogues to more info. At least the agreements today can be the framework for a future welcoming to the Catholic Church for the traditional remnant of Lutherans, perhaps by way of ordinariate or prelature, or even into the Anglican Ordinariate.
I pray for Francis and trust that the holy Father will lead us in understanding love between all people. The Church of Finland lost 30,000 members when the archbishop didn’t act fast enough to criticize anti-gay comments from a Lutheran parliament member last year. Lutherans are torn in two directions as the world’s view on sexually is evolving.
 
Regarding the ethical and anthropological issues of female clergy and gay clergy among some Lutherans. The Church of Sweden began ordaining women priests last century; now I believe, most Lutherans in Europe have female clergy as well as the ELCA and Lutheran Church of Canada. The Dialogue of Lutherans and Catholics acknowledges the practice and yet both signed the Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification in 1999. The Lutheran and Catholic Commission on Unity issued the ecumenical statement ‘From Conflict to Communion’ last year; well after some Lutherans began blessing same-sex marriages.

How does one explain this?
You mean the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Canada. The Lutheran Church - Canada does not ordain women.

To your point, perhaps the RCC was hopeful that those “Lutheran” communions that had begun ordaining women and blessing homosexual “marriages” would repent of their errors and return to orthodoxy.
 
I pray for Francis and trust that the holy Father will lead us in understanding love between all people. The Church of Finland lost 30,000 members when the archbishop didn’t act fast enough to criticize anti-gay comments from a Lutheran parliament member last year. Lutherans are torn in two directions as the world’s view on sexually is evolving.
All Christians are torn in two directions - one the way of the world, and the other the way God calls us to live.
 
Regarding the ethical and anthropological issues of female clergy and gay clergy among some Lutherans. The Church of Sweden began ordaining women priests last century; now I believe, most Lutherans in Europe have female clergy as well as the ELCA and Lutheran Church of Canada. The Dialogue of Lutherans and Catholics acknowledges the practice and yet both signed the Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification in 1999. The Lutheran and Catholic Commission on Unity issued the ecumenical statement ‘From Conflict to Communion’ last year; well after some Lutherans began blessing same-sex marriages.

How does one explain this?
In a Sola Church? Yet so many Lutherans on CAF claim
their version of Sola is more traditional and does
not use private interpretation in the same way as
the fundamentalist. Obviously that is not true is it?
At least in this case.
 
In a Sola Church? Yet so many Lutherans on CAF claim
their version of Sola is more traditional and does
not use private interpretation in the same way as
the fundamentalist. Obviously that is not true is it?
At least in this case.
I must admit that I am not well-versed on the theological/ ecclesiastical understanding the Church is discerning on the issue of human sexuality. I will read the below document from the ELCA

download.elca.org/ELCA%20Resource%20Repository/SexualitySS.pdf
 
I must admit that I am not well-versed on the theological/ ecclesiastical understanding the Church is discerning on the issue of human sexuality. I will read the below document from the ELCA

download.elca.org/ELCA%20Resource%20Repository/SexualitySS.pdf
Okay I read it. I’m sorry not impressed. For one thing
what I’m hearing here is a carefully concealed
OSAS philosophy in which the only sin that really
exists is to turn away from God and not believing
in His power to save.
Following moral rules and lifestyles is not
recommended because without faith it is meaningless.
Marriage is between a man and a woman EXCEPT
when loving ones neighbor includes same sex unions.
Then we are to encourage in a neighborly fashion,
uphold dignity and blah blah blah.
Tons and tons of references to Luther such as "following
Martin Luther we, and Luther wrote etc.
No wonder the suggestion that Luther was less than
sane is not allowed and any honest discussion OC
the man’s bizarre behavior is non existent.
The entire document lacks any type of real Scriptural
authority and is very relativistic and somewhat chaotic.

Is this document indicative of Lutherans in general?
 
Amen, amen, amen.

No. In fact, Lutheran bodies that still hold to the Confessions no longer consider the body that produced that self-contradictory document to even be an orthodox Lutheran body.
Wow. Wow. The WELS document!!! Um boy I have
not been acting attention I guess!
Is the ELCA a very large denomination? Includes the
European groups mentioned above does?

I’m glad the WELS document agreed with me on
Scripture. I was afraid my bias against Protestantism
was in the way but really- there’s no consideration
of Scripture in the ELCA doc. Lots of references to
Luther though as an authority.

However whatever devil is in action is showing
his face in the Catholic Church as well. We have new
Churches all over the U.S. claiming to be Catholic
but independant with the same thinking actually
as the ECLA. Sort of a “New Age” Catholicism
or something.
They support gay marriage women priests- basically
anything disallowed by Rome is a positive good in
so far as these Churches go.
Most amazing.
 
The WELC comes as close to being fundamentalist as any Baptist church. The LCMS is not far behind. Unlike Roman Catholic and Lutheran [LWF], the WELC/ LCMS reject historical criticism biblical study and find themselves isolated and somewhat “creationist” like several other fundamentalist Protestants. Their position places much strain on families who have children/ grandchildren who are gay and many leave the faith as a result.
 
That document is specific to the ELCA. The LCMS responded to it in 2012 (.pdf link) Response to Human Sexuality: Gift and Trust

Mary, you are correct in your assessment that we are not all on the same page.
Well I’m with you fellas at WELS!! Haha.
However if I may be so bold this ECLA “trust” relativism and
extreme distortion of “loving neighbor” is only to be expected
as a radicalization of WELS and Luther’s view of saved by faith alone.

Can you see it in the ECLA document? Their contempt for people
living by acceptable moral standards?

Pretty much they have radicalized the little seed planted by Luther
and the Confessional Lutherans.
Part of that Pandora’s Box we talked about on the other thread.
 
The WELC comes as close to being fundamentalist as any Baptist church. The LCMS is not far behind. Unlike Roman Catholic and Lutheran [LWF], the WELC/ LCMS reject historical criticism biblical study and find themselves isolated and somewhat “creationist” like several other fundamentalist Protestants. Their position places much strain on families who have children/ grandchildren who are gay and many leave the faith as a result.
Okay this is all news to me too. Who are the LWF and the LCMS and
how do they view the ELCA sexuality document? Good links for those two?

Wow I had no idea. You guys are way way more fractured than I thought and
way more than the RC. Where have I BEEN I didn’t know all this? Lol
To me Lutheran just means Lutheran.
And how is a poor Catholic on CAF supposed to know what kind of
Lutheran they are talking to?
 
Well I’m with you fellas at WELS!! Haha.
However if I may be so bold this ECLA “trust” relativism and
extreme distortion of “loving neighbor” is only to be expected
as a radicalization of WELS and Luther’s view of saved by faith alone.

Can you see it in the ECLA document? Their contempt for people
living by acceptable moral standards?

Pretty much they have radicalized the little seed planted by Luther
and the Confessional Lutherans.
Part of that Pandora’s Box we talked about on the other thread.
You may be very surprised/ humbled some day. As the Lutheran woman pastor in the video points out, we yield to the Holy Spirit as articulated by the Pope.
 
christus_vincit

You asked:

Regarding the Four Marks of the Church (FMC) . . .

Lutherans often include the FMC in their creeds. Some just change the Creed (as has been stated) to “One, Holy, Christian, and Apostolic”. Other various Lutheran ecclesial communions leave the Creed intact (“One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic”). I have seen it both ways in assorted Lutheran services.

Asserting it and defending it is quite another thing for our Lutheran friends and family members.

I have never heard a Lutheran defend the four marks of the Church in my conversations with them (I am not saying it does not happen, I am just saying I have never heard it from them in conversation and they DO seem to shy away from the topic when it is brought up).

The one-ness makes Lutherans very uncomfortable as it doesn’t fit in their religious traditions that have spawned from the Reformation. The word “Catholic” (even with a small “c”) sometimes makes Lutherans and some other non-Catholics uncomfortable.

Regarding the “Apostolic” aspect, that also seems to depend on the Lutheran you talk to.

(Various Catholics may offer differing opinions too concerning Apostolicity, but in various Lutheran communities, since they have no earthly person that has God-given, God-protected authority, there can be no definitive settling of such a difference at least in an authoritative manner. Catholics can be authoritatively corrected).

Lutherans view Apostolic Succession different than the Church views it.

This impossibility to have the “One” (of the FMC) or unity in Lutheranism occurs on account of the Lutheran ecclesial motif.

This lack of unity is one of the reasons my dad left one of the Lutheranisms for Catholicism.

Christus_vincit (and others), I think you already have this Papal/unity paradigm in your heart. But I will elaborate on a point or two as there are other readers of this thread here that may not . . .

The Pope (who has a special office) is the living visible sign of Christian unity on earth among other things. Christ set it up this way. That’s why the Church can be ONE. No other religion can authentically have this level of unity or “one-ness”.

St. Peter (along with the other Apostles) were to become fishers of men.

Now think of John 21, the Resurrected Lord Jesus, and the Apostles on the Sea of Galilee.

When the net was brought to shore in John 21, the Apostles had to drag it, as it was so heavy (assuming these “large fish” averaged 7 pounds, this net-full, would weigh approx. half a ton).

Yet when the Resurrected Lord Jesus orders fish to be brought to Him, St. Peter alone is described as bringing the net “full of large fish” to Him. I am not saying the others didn’t help Peter. But I am saying St. John only describes St. Peter as bringing this untorn or unschismed net.

It would be worth prayerfully dwelling on John 21:10-11 and asking yourself if there could be deeper meanings here or if this is mere coincidence (St. John certainly isn’t trying to tell us about St. Peter’s muscular prowess. Nor is he telling us about the superb fishing-net material).

**
JOHN 21:10-11** 10 Jesus said to them, “Bring some of the fish which you have now caught.” 11 Simon Peter went up and drew the net to land, full of large fish, a hundred and fifty-three; and although there were so many, the net was not torn (literally the net was not “schismed” or “schisthe”).

The Church is ONE, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic.

Lutherans are not One in this sense. Lutherans are not in the fullest sense, Catholic either.

And for Lutherans, the concept of Apostolic Succession is not the same as the Church (One, Holy, Catholic, and APOSTOLIC).

These are probably among the reasons why I never hear the Four Marks defended by Lutherans (although again, technically speaking, these Four Marks are usually affirmed by Lutherans, but this “affirmation” turns out to be something quite different from what the Church teaches–which is just what you’d expect perhaps).
Hi Cathoholic: I like your explanation of John 21;10-11. I would not mind using it if it is ok with you. I had read that passage many times but had not thought of it in the way that you had presented it. I also have to say that Lutheran’s so far as I have seen on CAF have not defended the four marks of the Church. Lutheran’s as I understand it have separated from the one true Church and then say that they are the one true Church. I think there is a big difference between being in shism and breaking totally away from the Church which it seems to me from reading history that is what Luther did.
 
You may be very surprised/ humbled some day. As the Lutheran woman pastor in the video points out, we yield to the Holy Spirit as articulated by the Pope.
Yes I’m sure she hopes and feels that way just as
the women priests in Los Gatos feel self righteously
that they are the one true Church.
You see these days whenever anyone is in conflict
with the traditional or mainstream Catholics they just
“pull a Luther” so to speak, set up their own Church
call it Lutheran or Catholic, claim to have the true
Spirit and exalt themselves thusly with the help
of the secular media. The idea that they themselves
could be WRONG and WILLFUL is laughed at because
we must remember Jesus is nothing more than THEIR
BFF and boy is He going to be made at us guys!

And so there is no Scriptural basis in their theology,
no Christian sacrifice, nothing.
They don’t use Scripture because there is absolutely
NOTHING in Scripture or in Christ’s WORD that supports
same sex marriage but there are verses that seem
to condemn it.
 
And which Church exactly IS that?
Without making an exclusive claim, I would have to say my church.

If I didn’t believe that, I would have to find the church with that authority.

(yes… it’s almost circular reasoning… )
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top