C
cam100
Guest
I think you’re being ridiculous here. What is this “increasing unacceptability” of which you speak? To whom is a healthy, normal woman now “unacceptable”? Are you saying that today’s man is no longer attracted to normal, healthy women? Are women today finding themselves without partners because no man will have them? I really don’t that’s true.It’s more than skinny models, though. It’s the increasing unacceptability of the sight of a woman who looks like anything that could posibly exist in nature in terms of size, shape, finish, coloring, balance and composition. Bones get digitally airbrushed off women’s faces when they appear on magazine covers. Now natural skin, fat, muscle, hair and bone are forbidden. .
Sorry, but I don’t think Victoria’s Secret models look like “some slick amphibian or catfish” or “wooden, plastic” or “some substance harder than living tissue”. Plus, even if they look unreal, it is evident from the stats I quoted above that, contrary to the opinion of some, women are not following their example. The obesity rate is frighteningly high, but the anorexia incidence is only about 3%. Clearly, skinny models are not having a great impact of women’s health.What does that leave? Not much of the original woman. It’s an anti-life pursuit. It’s bestial because it upholds an ideal that we be formed like some slenderized porpoise, surfaced like some slick amphibian or catfish, colored like a mandrill, able to balance like a sandpiper, and sex-crazed like a notorious other primate is said to be. It’s necrophiliac because it upholds an ideal that cannot live and that does not look alive but rather wooden, plastic, some substance harder than living tissue.