A word on Beato Hallucination

  • Thread starter Thread starter philipmarie
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
P

philipmarie

Guest
Through the Immaculate Heart of the ever Blessed Virgin Mary,

Hello. As one can see, I am a traditional Catholic(and I said it before, I never SAID that I support sedevacantism or the Siri Thesis!). I wrote a rather strong hate letter to traditioninaction(INaction) which they mischievously called Beato hallucination(one can see it in the link below, it is the first letter on the traditioninaction.org/Questions/K021_Beato.html). In the third sentence, I even use a rather strong word(it is not a bad word, but it is a rather strong one and is not to be used in front of children or anyone else for that matter AT ALL.) and even use the word anti-pope…

First, please regard the letter as I wrote AS IF I was one who supported the Siri thesis. Those tradition in action people really are heretical laicists. John Vennari wrote an article which tries to put into your head a very wrong notion of Papal infallibility. He says that: *It is necessary to understand this in order to counteract the false notion of Papal Infallibility held by many Catholics who claim that the Pope can pretty much do or say anything he wants simply because he is Pope. * It is true that the Pope cannot say for example’, that Jesus is not God, but by a special action of the Blessed Virgin(who is the Mediatrix of all grace and the Ruler of the World and the Church), he is prevented from doing so when he is speaking ex cathedra: that is, when he speaks as Pope.

Now, I wrote that angry letter, not to show my contempt for traditioninaction: I wanted to show a message, which is(note: I am going to speak not as a sedevacantist, which I am not, but I am going to use some arguments to go against them) in the form of questions:
  1. Why do the guys at TIA say that they are resisting Roncalli-Ratzinger to the face, when in fact, they only criticize them and ridicule them?
  2. Maybe because it is not their intention to restore tradition inside the Church?
  3. TIA says that Roncalli-Ratzinger all held heretical and false doctrines before and after their elections. Would not that make their(Roncalli-Ratzinger) elections null, void and illegitimate, according to the Papal Bull Cum ex Apostolatus Officio?
  4. Why does TIA then accept Roncalli-ratzinger as legitimate Popes, if by accepting these ‘anti-popes’ they place themselves outside the Church?
  5. Is it because TIA pretends that this document does not exist; is this why it is not mentioned on their website?
  6. If Roncalli-Ratzinger were true Popes then, why did they sign and accept these heretical doctrines with the fishermans ring?
  7. Why does TIA say that Pius XII(a definitely true Pope) say that he made a Masonic and heretical reform of the Tridentine Mass, when the Pope cannot err in faith and morals?
  8. WHy does it even say that the very great and Marian Pope, Pople Leo XIII that he tried to reconcile the Church with freemasonry and that other Popes wanted
    to bad and heretical things?
  9. And why does it say that all the other things which came after Vatican II, that is, the novus ordo missae, new froms of sacraments, etc,. are valid but illegitimate, if the Church cannot accept heretical and illegitimate things?
  10. Maybe becuase this heretical doctrine that a Pope can err goes according to their caprices?
  11. Would that not show, if it were true, that Jesus and Mary decieved us, since they gave us a Church that errs?
  12. Is it not agaisnt Church teaching to say that the Pope and the Church can err in faith and morals?
 
  1. Then, why does tradition in action ignore and change all these timeless doctrines?
  2. Maybe because if they do accept them in their true form, they would have to give up their empire$ and have to work even harder?
  3. Why does TIA’s resistance consist in just sitting around a table discussing with sad faces with each other, trying to ridicule the post conciliar church and it’s popes, writing entertaining books and making people look like clowns?
  4. Maybe because they feel heady and proud and because they feel that they are better than others? Is this why they do this?
  5. Or is it because they do not love the Blessed Mother as much as they claim to?
  6. Why do they err so much when speaking of the message of Fatima, which principally consists, according to them, in consecrating Russia?
  7. Maybe because they are those silly external(or superficial) devotees of Our Lady which Saint Louis de Montfort speaks of?
  8. Why does not the ‘real’ message of Fatima consist in consoling and loving the Blessed Virgin with your whole heart?
  9. Why do they make such a big fuss over a fake third secret of Fatima, which does not include reference to the words spoken by Mary Herself: In, Portugal, the dogma of the faith will always be preserved…?
  10. Maybe they want only to enjoy their time in making fun of the ‘anti-popes’?
 
  1. Is this the reason that makes TIA interpret the third secret literally, and not as if it is full of symbolism?
  2. Why does it make no reference in favor of the Siri thesis but instead, it posts pictures of Cardinal Siri of Genoa?
  3. Could it be that they want to send a cryptic message [to those who say that Siri was Pope], that they love Cardinal Siri but cannot accept him as Pope because there is no evidence?

Cardinal Siri of Genoa.
  1. Why is a group of lay catholics and doubtfully ordained priests trying to restore the Church, when it is not they who decide but the Pope and the Church which decides?
  2. Is it true that they are not infallible, since they are only human?
  3. Is this the reason why they change and ignore pure doctrine?
  4. Why does TIA try to imbue into it’s readers a spirit of severity, such as not showing too much compassion, and of punishing children who fail, instead of using John Bosco’s prevention system?
(Note: sometimes a little severity is good to correct children, but TIA really exagerates the use of severity. But do not go to the other extreme that is, of letting bad people do what they want. That would not be kindness, that would be laziness and weakness. the prevention system of John Bosco does not consist in letting children do what they want or encoureging them to do the bad things which they like… it consists in bringing children closer to holiness with love, kindness, gentleness, and even tenderness. If you want to understand it fully, I suggest reading Forty dreams of Saint John Bosco by TAN and to have an extraordinary devotion to Our Lady. Now THAT is where you will get love, gentleness, tenderness and compassion!
  1. Why does it even post blasphemous pictures which mock Our Lady and to even describe them?
  2. Maybe their intention is not to evoke love for Her, but to shock the people?
  3. John Bosco said that the Chair of Peter, the Pope and the Church are one and the same thing. Does not that make an anti-pope the leader of his own false Church?
  4. Does this mean that if Roncalli-Ratzinger were anti-popes, TIA is trying to restore things in a false Church?
  5. Finally, if TIA really is trying to restore things in a false Church, if it accepts anti-popes as Popes, if it teaches heresies and laicist things etc,… does this not place TIA outside the Church; does this mean that if they were to die they would go to hell since outside the Church there is no salvation?
This is it. I wrote it to avoid scandal. I wrote it in such a way so as to avoid getting banned by claiming that I am a sedevacantist(I am not a sedevacantists, I sincerely am not), But I am in no way prasing the actions of Vatican II(I said I wrote it in such a way…) as Vatican II really did deviate from Church teaching.

I want to end with a few words on the Blessed Virgin. The gates of hell will never win where Our Lady offers Her protection. Since the Blessed Virgin wishes the absoloute good to all, She will DEFINITELY lead us straight to heaven. She protects us from falling into heresy.

God, it is true, does permit some, in His justice, to fall into sin and sometimes, he leaves us to ourselves to overcome our temptations to increase our merit. But the Blessed Virgin never leaves Her children alone, not even to increase their merit if they do it by them selves. She will lead us to heaven because, since we are Her CHILDREN, She will give graces to us abundantly and it happens, that when Mary fights with us in the battle against the serpent, we gain and fight more meritously and even more easily. But one must give himself up to the the Blessed Virgin.

I am going to make a few threads which speak of devotion to the Blessed Virgin. In the mean time, please salute the Lady with a Hail Mary for the author so that he may love Her, make others love Her, and that Sh emay love him unto folly because of his love for Her.
Look deep into Her eyes and let Her look deep into yours!

For love of the Blessed Virgin Mary,
philipmarie.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top