The seam where the Democratic party sewed together those who really were “personally opposed, but unwilling to restrict others” and the genuinely pro-abortion people who want fewer humans on the earth is ripping apart.
The Stupak amendment is entirely non-threatening to someone genuinely “pro-choice.” By that definition, I mean someone who is not opposed to the legality of abortion and wants the government to have no part in coercing people one way or the other on the issue.
THIS kind of “pro-choice” politician is uncomfortable forcing Americans to fund abortions either through tax dollars or required insurance premiums. That is fundamentally NOT “pro-choice”, it is “pro-abortion.” NARAL, NOW and Planned Parenthood have OODLES of money and would be entirely able to pay for an abortion for every uninsured woman who wants one. There is no reason to force every American to pay for abortions, regardless of how you see the issue morally.
As pro-lifers, we cannot be satisfied that this is any sort of “victory.” All we’ve done is temporarily staved off a massive defeat (being forced to pay for the abortions of others). But it is good to see that the “pro-choice” block of politicians is not as monolithic or unified as they sometimes can seem.