E
Ender
Guest
Actually, assuming those men were in fact innocent, these would be cases of justice - given that they were all released.My point in an earlier post indicated that, approximately 15 condemed men accused of, tried and convicted by a jury and sentenced to death, were innocent and freed by DNA evidence, before the death penalty was carried out. In this case it will be called murder of an inncent.
Since the US reinstated the death penalty in 1976 there have been 1,136 people executed through the end of 2008. Of that number perhaps 4-8 can reasonably be considered questionable, although none has been shown to have been innocent. That is, in 32 years of executions, the total number killed is about one-quarter of the number of abortions done in a single day, and there is no doubt about the innocence of those victims. That’s the statistic that should make your skin crawl.My skin crawls when one is to wonder, in the past, how many innocent condemed men were murdered and how many guilty men went with them.
Such a jury would be guiltless provided they acted in good faith.Is it OK that the jury didn’t know they were really innocent. Does a jury have blood on their hands if they truly didn’t know.
(Aquinas ST II/II 64,8) Augustine says to Publicola (Ep. xlvii): “When we do a thing for a good and lawful purpose, if thereby we unintentionally cause harm to anyone, it should by no means be imputed to us.” Now it sometimes happens by chance that a person is killed as a result of something done for a good purpose. Therefore the person who did it is not accounted guilty.
Ender