Abortion in Case of Incest or Rape

  • Thread starter Thread starter WordisLove
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Would it not be prudent to err on the side of caution, on the side of life? It is selfish to think of only yourself and not your child’s. Service above self? Ring a bell? I’m a healthcare student as well and the department chair for health sciences told all the programs that the day we started school. It goes beyond what we do in the hospital, but our daily lives as well.
wait…it would be selfish of me to not carry a baby to term because I don’t have adequate healthcare?

It would be selfish of me to carry a poorly-nourished baby to term when if I had an abortion, the child wouldn’t have to undergo suffering while in the womb (because of lack of nutrition) and outside of it for the rest of its life, regardless of whether I kept the baby or put it up for adoption (because I couldn’t take care of it in the womb…)?

I’m not following you.
 
wait…it would be selfish of me to not carry a baby to term because I don’t have adequate healthcare?
Yes, because it’s not a “potential” person - he or she is already a person. Having an abortion means killing someone who is already alive, because of the inconvenience of their existence.

Killing your unborn child because you don’t have adequate health insurance is exactly the same as if we killed you for not having adequate health insurance - if we said “Well, we don’t have the money to take care of this person if something goes wrong in the next year or so, so we’d better kill her, so that we won’t have to pay her hospital bills, if she would need to go to the hospital,” it would be the same thing.

I hope you would agree that it would be monstrous to kill you just because they might get sick in the next nine months - it is equally monstrous to have an abortion because you are worried that you might need to have a hospital birth.
It would be selfish of me to carry a poorly-nourished baby to term when if I had an abortion, the child wouldn’t have to undergo suffering while in the womb (because of lack of nutrition) and outside of it for the rest of its life, regardless of whether I kept the baby or put it up for adoption (because I couldn’t take care of it in the womb…)?
Would you think it was okay to kill a born baby because there was not enough food in the house? Or would you try to get food into the house (through St. Vincent de Paul, or other helping organizations), instead? 🤷

It’s the same thing, because the unborn child is just as much a human being as you are, and as I am.
 
wait…it would be selfish of me to not carry a baby to term because I don’t have adequate healthcare?

It would be selfish of me to carry a poorly-nourished baby to term when if I had an abortion, the child wouldn’t have to undergo suffering while in the womb (because of lack of nutrition) and outside of it for the rest of its life, regardless of whether I kept the baby or put it up for adoption (because I couldn’t take care of it in the womb…)?

I’m not following you.
False choice, in fact you could obtain proper nutrition for your child in utero and health care for the delivery … there are many options.

First: There exist government sponsored social safety nets: like the WIC rogram, food stamps, welfare programs … even health care …

Second: Many charitable oganizations exist to assist you in carrying the child to term. They will also assist you in adoption or in keeping the child …

Third: Many couples seeking to adopt will cover the expenses [health care and proper nutrition and living expenses] for woman to carry her child to term. They even offer open adoptions so the mother can decide to maintain contact or not to …

And none of the above three includes the obvious option - family assistance and support …
 
Abortion is just picking and choosing who it is OK to murder
Its just too bad that there are these rotten rapists about, where do they get the nerve?
Bearing a rapist child is quite a trial I think for the women.I have heard that every conception is the will of God Know matter rape or incest etc, but it is still hard on the women
 
wait…it would be selfish of me to not carry a baby to term because I don’t have adequate healthcare?

It would be selfish of me to carry a poorly-nourished baby to term when if I had an abortion, the child wouldn’t have to undergo suffering while in the womb (because of lack of nutrition) and outside of it for the rest of its life, regardless of whether I kept the baby or put it up for adoption (because I couldn’t take care of it in the womb…)?

I’m not following you.
It is selfish when you could easily get medicaid for the pregnancy and as others have mentioned, WIC, foostamps, etc. As far as after birth, it would be very easy to put the child up for adoption to a loving family.
 
Its just too bad that there are these rotten rapists about, where do they get the nerve?
Bearing a rapist child is quite a trial I think for the women.I have heard that every conception is the will of God Know matter rape or incest etc, but it is still hard on the women
Yes. It is hard on the women. But it’s worse for women who choose abortion. Women who bring their pregnancies to term whether they keep the baby or give them up for adoption never regret their choice. The ones who go for the quick fix solution regret it for the rest of their lives. This is the torment that goes on in their heads: “I had an abortion because I was raped. Because I was raped I had an abortion. I had an abortion because I was raped. Because I was raped I had an abortion. I had an abortion because I was raped. Because I was raped I had an abortion” Over and over and over. Their abortion will forever remind them they were raped. And does anyone know who the biggest supporter for abortions in cases of rape is ? Are you ready? Here it comes. THE RAPIST! That’s who! Rape is a crime. Yet somehow when pregnancy occurs in those rare situations it’s merely looked upon as an incorrect inconvenient method of conception and the rapist goes free to rape again and again and again. Here’s what goes on in a rapists head “You fool. I had my way with you. Now you’ve got blood on your hands. I didn’t kill you, but you killed the innocent life within you. You won’t remember me, but you’ll always remember what I did. Thank you for destroying the evidence of my crime so I can rape another victim and another and another and make them tormented for the rest of their lives like I did you. Let’s hear it for abortion, it keeps rape legal!”
 
Yes. It is hard on the women. But it’s worse for women who choose abortion. Women who bring their pregnancies to term whether they keep the baby or give them up for adoption never regret their choice. The ones who go for the quick fix solution regret it for the rest of their lives. This is the torment that goes on in their heads: “I had an abortion because I was raped. Because I was raped I had an abortion. I had an abortion because I was raped. Because I was raped I had an abortion. I had an abortion because I was raped. Because I was raped I had an abortion” Over and over and over. Their abortion will forever remind them they were raped. And does anyone know who the biggest supporter for abortions in cases of rape is ? Are you ready? Here it comes. THE RAPIST! That’s who! Rape is a crime. Yet somehow when pregnancy occurs in those rare situations it’s merely looked upon as an incorrect inconvenient method of conception and the rapist goes free to rape again and again and again. “Dear victim; You fool. I had my way with you. Now you’ve got blood on your hands. I didn’t kill you, but you killed the innocent life within you. You won’t remember me, but you’ll always remember what I did. Thank you for destroying the evidence of my crime so I can rape another victim and another and another and make them tormented for the rest of their lives like I did you. Let’s hear it for abortion, it keeps rape legal!” signed, your rapist.
That post was so good it needs to be seen twice. With a slight variation of course.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top