Unless of course, they had a miraculous conversion through the Miraculous Medal, as in Zac’s case, which may have given him a special ministry to use the bad in his life to promote the good?
You know, I was just thinking about “testing the spirits” here when I came upon your post. Someone here (and I don’t have to mention names) is certainly causing discord and division.
Well said. I was wondering,also, if this person was supporting satanism. It seemed to me he or she was.
God bless you.Unless of course, they had a miraculous conversion through the Miraculous Medal, as in Zac’s case, which may have given him a special ministry to use the bad in his life to promote the good?
It isn’t an unusual thing to happen.
That is what is happening. Zack definitely has a message about God’s forgiveness. However, he is no longer a Satanist. What I said about Satanists not using their information for constructive ends still stands.I’m an engineer, and I think I got infected with demon really bad that one day June 8, 2001. I had to analyze its moves and reverse engineer it, so I could get rid of it. I finally transformed externally to where my pastor called it last Thanksgiving, that I no longer had the same persona – but I didn’t actually “feel” totally free until Wednesday afternoon, 11 1/3 years later. Wednesday as in October 3. Something “snapped” and I’ve been in nearly constant serenity since then. It wasn’t even really a “snap,” but just all of a sudden things were different with no fanfare in betweeen. I discussed it with my pastor this morning after Mass, and he was delighted. He knows me well, and he knows psychology, and is an expert at body language and microexpressions, so he’s really been coaching me a lot. The closest thing I can think of to describe the experience is the last two stanzas of the soul – it feels like they have been playing out since then.Exactly like that, except that there is no comparison between Satanists and football players or engineers.Satanists neither battle with Satan, nor use their information for constructive ends.
Alan
Oh, gosh. I didn’t realize that’s how you meant it. Yeah, of course they will not willingly give us “intelligence,” right?God bless you.
This is the first thing that came to my mind when others were questioning the offering of all abortions to satan. Not that hard to understand…IF you know your Catholic faith.
Do you have any idea how insulting that is to someone who didn’t understand about the Satanic sacrifice of abortions? Congratulations on being so smart and having so much more knowledge of Catholicism.
What Alan said, I get it now too.
I guess I’m somewhat on the defensive since the discord started on this thread. And truth be told, now that another poster has disclosed more credentials about Zac, he is a good friend of mine also, and is the real deal. I strongly support him and his, (or rather"Mary’s") ministry.
Oh, no. Didn’t mean to be insulting here. sorry for that. I know that not everyone here is Catholic. And even then, most (80%?) of Catholics that I know do NOT know their Catholic faith.Do you have any idea how insulting that is to someone who didn’t understand about the Satanic sacrifice of abortions? Congratulations on being so smart and having so much more knowledge of Catholicism.
In regard to a Satanic practice, you are saying that anyone who didn’t understand is either not Catholic or falls into the 80% of Catholics who “do NOT know their Catholic faith”.
Isn’t Zack’s statement about mothers passing along original sin a heresy which stomps all over the Catholic teaching of Mary the Immaculate Conception?
No, that’s not what she said. She asserted that “80% of the Catholics she knows” NOT that she knows 80% of the Catholics. It seems you would have seen that since you quoted it in your post.In regard to a Satanic practice, you are saying that anyone who didn’t understand is either not Catholic or falls into the 80% of Catholics who “do NOT know their Catholic faith”.
^^ One of the worst apologies in the history of apologies. ^^
*The Council of Trent, although it did not make this solution obligatory by a definition, regarded it with favour and authorized its use (cf. Pallavicini, “Istoria del Concilio di Trento”, vii-ix). Original sin is described not only as the death of the soul (Sess. V, can. ii), but as a “privation of justice that each child contracts at its conception” (Sess. VI, cap. iii). But the Council calls “justice” what we call sanctifying grace (Sess. VI), and as each child should have had personally his own justice so now after the fall he suffers his own privation of justice. *
Hmmm. I did not misread. Perhaps you misread. She is not apologizing to you. She was attempting to apologize to those who might have been offended by her statement regarding the lack of knowledge in those who did not understand Satanic sacrifices of abortions.No, that’s not what she said. She asserted that “80% of the Catholics she knows” NOT that she knows 80% of the Catholics. It seems you would have seen that since you quoted it in your post.
Hmmmm Maybe you missed it. i too have responded to posts in the past that i have misread. I thought it was a very nice & sincere apology. I am also not an expert on the Catholic Church. There’s so much to know. So Ljsedivy I graciously accept your apology because i AM in the 80% that you know