Abortion Preferable To Homo Parents?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rwoehmke
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
R

rwoehmke

Guest
Would you rather have homosexual “parents” or be the victim of abortion?
 
40.png
rwoehmke:
Would you rather have homosexual “parents” or be the victim of abortion?
Click to expand...
So, are those my only choices? I think children deserve to live in two parent families where the parents are married to each other (man and woman), with no previous families etc. I will go out on a limb here when I say children deserve a family where parents love each other and the Lord, and they teach the children to love the Lord. Is this a pipe dream? Maybe, but it is the best case scenario for all children.

Things that aren’t important: income level, race, location of living arangements, level of education. I will think of more things that aren’t important and maybe others can help me make an inconsequential list.
 
First of all the right to life is paramount.Second how is it that the homosexuals will impregnate each other?Third we have enough self proclaimed Christians to take in adoptive children and it is an insult that the attorneys charge so much for their services in helping people to adopt.Please explain your question so I can answer you appropiately cause I am not sure what your trying to say.God Bless
 
Homo is somewhat derogatory. We need to treat all people with Christian charity. I do not think being raised by gay parents would be worse than being aborted. These people are not evil, the act is another story.

I’ve worked with gay people and there usually otherwise good people that are confused and and in my experience suffered trauma in childhood which has lead them to make the choice that they have made. Every gay person that I’ve known well enough to discuss more personal things has shared early trauma.

I think it’s rather unkind to say you’d rather be dead than have parents with same sex attraction.
 
40.png
rayne89:
I think it’s rather unkind to say you’d rather be dead than have parents with same sex attraction.
Click to expand...
Did someone say that? I don’t think so.
 
40.png
Fitz:
Did someone say that? I don’t think so.
Click to expand...
The question was would you rather be aborted than have gay parents? Am I wrong to assume you’d be dead if you were aborted?
 
40.png
rayne89:
The question was would you rather be aborted than have gay parents? Am I wrong to assume you’d be dead if you were aborted?
Click to expand...
Yeah, but we took it a step farther. Did you read the other posts? No one thinks death is best.That is not usually the choice now is it?
 
40.png
Fitz:
Yeah, but we took it a step farther. Did you read the other posts? No one thinks death is best.That is not usually the choice now is it?
Click to expand...
I typed the post before anyone had posted. By the time I got done typing there were several posts. I was directing my comment to the original poster.
 
40.png
rayne89:
I typed the post before anyone had posted. By the time I got done typing there were several posts. I was directing my comment to the original poster.
Click to expand...
Oops! That has happened to me sometimes too, and then things don’t follow. I thought it was something because we don’t ever want death. We seem inflexible, but life means more to us than anything.
 
40.png
rayne89:
Homo is somewhat derogatory. We need to treat all people with Christian charity. I do not think being raised by gay parents would be worse than being aborted. These people are not evil, the act is another story.

I’ve worked with gay people and there usually otherwise good people that are confused and and in my experience suffered trauma in childhood which has lead them to make the choice that they have made. Every gay person that I’ve known well enough to discuss more personal things has shared early trauma.

I think it’s rather unkind to say you’d rather be dead than have parents with same sex attraction.
Click to expand...
I agree. Homo is sort of a lowbrow slur.
 
The director of nursing where I work is a gay man who used to be married to a woman. While I don’t understand or approve of his lifestyle, he seems to be a very involved Dad and I doubt if his kids are any more disadvantaged than a lot of kids. There are millions of kids in this world with less than ideal folks.

Maybe ask the question:“Would you rather have a slut for a mother or have been aborted?” How does that sound? :confused: :rolleyes:
 
40.png
Lisa4Catholics:
First of all the right to life is paramount.Second how is it that the homosexuals will impregnate each other?Third we have enough self proclaimed Christians to take in adoptive children and it is an insult that the attorneys charge so much for their services in helping people to adopt.Please explain your question so I can answer you appropiately cause I am not sure what your trying to say.God Bless
Click to expand...
It is not unknown for lesbians to have children by artificial insemination or the services of a stud friend. I guess a male pair would have a problem without a surrogate mother. Sometimes homosexual couples can have children without the ordinary route of adoption, so the question is can we live with such “couples” in our communities or would you prefer abortion. I am thinking no way to abortion as those young lives are much more important then who they have for “parents”,
 
JMJ

I think Lisa4Catholics pretty much explains it best!

“First of all the right to life is paramount.Second how is it that the homosexuals will impregnate each other?”
**
Yours in Christ,
 
Sorry if the word homo offended any one. It has been in my vocabulary for over 60 years and I thought it had lost its original sting. As to the purpose for this question: I have noticed that the posts in this forum or usually quite negative about “Gays” and I was beginning to wonder if there were any people out there who were homophobic enough to go for abortion. I am reassured by the quality of your posts. . Like some of you I do know some Gay people none of which have kids or are in Gay marriages. I don’t get into discussions about their private behavior and would have to say that by and large they are as nice if not more nice than some of my “normal” friends.
 
40.png
rwoehmke:
Sorry if the word homo offended any one. It has been in my vocabulary for over 60 years and I thought it had lost its original sting. As to the purpose for this question: I have noticed that the posts in this forum or usually quite negative about “Gays” and I was beginning to wonder if there were any people out there who were homophobic enough to go for abortion. I am reassured by the quality of your posts. . Like some of you I do know some Gay people none of which have kids or are in Gay marriages. I don’t get into discussions about their private behavior and would have to say that by and large they are as nice if not more nice than some of my “normal” friends.
Click to expand...
Homophobic is not the point.In my oppinion the issues seems to be if children are in a good environment for their souls sake.My best freind is a non-practicing homosexual,who himself doesn’t feel like homosexuals especially practicing homosexuals should raise children.I went to high school at a performing arts highschool and there were alot of male and female homosexuals I was freinds with alot of them.They were very nice and very wounded,most had been molested or raped at a young age by the same sex and all had a distant if not absence of the same sex parent.Their idea of how to get love was sex,how to give love was sex and their humanity and identaty is reduced to their sexuality.One boy committed suicide arter he found out he had aids,he couldn’t tell his parents.Homophobia,no.Protecting children yes.Homosexuals with the help of God of course can be celibate and even canged(with God all is possible).Children are like sponges and need to be protected,nobody would rather see a child die by abortion rather than have homosexual parents.How many would be willing to tell the child that their parents run the risk of hell?How many would dissuade them from the same lifestyle?Why would anyone including the homosexuals want to put the child in that position and call that loving?God Bless
 
40.png
rwoehmke:
Would you rather have homosexual “parents” or be the victim of abortion?
Click to expand...
Children really deserve the best and need the best that their biological parents can give them.

We must be respectful of those that have same-sex attraction, but I think it is selfish of them to deprive youngsters of the best possible environment for children’s development.

You can imagine that small children would not think anything of it until they reached some age where they realized that their “parents” were different. Their peers might ostracize them so badly, and in so many ways, that these “parents” ought to consider the children’s rights, even more so than their own rights.
They should realize that the children might be devastated, traumatized, confused, and overwhelmed by how they were raised, not to mention the mixed emotions that they might have or develop toward the opposite sex parent who is missing.

I follow the teachings of the Church which does not approve of same-sex unions, to begin with. So, my comments only apply to those who flaunt the guidance of the Church. I would think that such a “family” would be very dysfunctional and most of the children forced into such a “family” would be disturbed their entire life.

I guess I’ve avoided the question. “Neither aborted nor the child of homosexual parents” – there are alternatives. I’d rather be raised naked by wolves.
 
I would go further than White Dove and say this is a disgusting question, can we please discuss something relevant like beer, hot dogs and the superbowl?
 
40.png
rwoehmke:
Would you rather have homosexual “parents” or be the victim of abortion?
Click to expand...
This question is as irrelevant as it is offensive.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top