Abortion 'Study' Claiming 68,000 Women Die Per Year Only Based on Pro-Abortion Guess

  • Thread starter Thread starter WanderAimlessly
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
W

WanderAimlessly

Guest
More proof that the Culture of Death is using opinion as fact just to further their agenda:
**Abortion ‘Study’ Claiming 68,000 Women Die Per Year Only Based on Pro-Abortion Guesses
Click to expand...
**LONDON, November 24, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) - A study by Dr Shusheela Singh on unsafe abortion, due to appear in this week’s edition of the British medical magazine, the Lancet, uses flawed data to promote abortion, says the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children (SPUC).
Click to expand...
Paul Tully, SPUC general secretary, commented: "The author of this story works for one of the most wealthy and politically powerful pro-abortion lobby groups in the world, the Wall Street-based Guttmacher Institute. The “research” was funded by the Hewlett Foundation, a notoriously pro-abortion body.
Click to expand...
Yet, the real facts about abortion and its effects are being visionsly being attacked by the Culture of Death.
 
This is proof that those who support abortion do so on blind faith.
 
BobCatholic said:
This is proof that those who support abortion do so on blind faith.
Click to expand...
I don’t think it is blind faith. They just turn their backs on the truth, or just pretend not to see the truth when it is staring them in the face. I believe that anyone who truly examines their conscience will know that abortion is wrong, but many just refuse to listen to themselves. It saddens me, but it is the focus of much of my prayer everyday.
 
Bernard Nathanson, former abortionist, and one of the founders of NARAL, admitted in his book, “The Hand of God”, that statistics of women’s deaths were often widely exaggerated.
He said , *“There were perhaps three hundred or so deaths from criminal abortions annually in the United States in the sixties, but NARAL in its press releases claimed to have data that supported a figure of five thousand.
Fourtunately, the respected biostatistician Dr Christopher Tietze was our ally. Though he never actually staked himself to a specific number, he never denied the authenticity of these claims” *
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top