L
lil_flower_luv
Guest
That does not make BC morally good. “What’s popular is not always right and what’s right is not always popular.”The number would be astronomical in comparison to the current number.
That does not make BC morally good. “What’s popular is not always right and what’s right is not always popular.”The number would be astronomical in comparison to the current number.
No George Washington cut down the cherry tree. Ben Franklin was a Mason. Nuff Said.I’m not trying to say Ben Franklin was an unbeliever, I truly have no idea, I was just looking up some famous quotes of pasts presidents once and found that - wasn’t he the one that chopped down the cherry tree and said “I cannot tell a lie”!?
90% of polled Catholics believe BC is okay, Just look at the number of children that ALL couples in your own church have.That does not make BC morally good. “What’s popular is not always right and what’s right is not always popular.”
But have you read about what the vatican has to say about it?90% of polled Catholics believe BC is okay, Just look at the number of children that ALL couples in your own church have.
The point is moot.
NEW HAVEN, July 10, 2009 (LifeSiteNews.com) - The American people continue to move to the90% of polled Catholics believe BC is okay, Just look at the number of children that ALL couples in your own church have.
The point is moot.
Actually the number is probably astromonmical along with the one’s that we know about, for those who have had a spontanous abortion because of ABC is probably vastly unknown and I believe we only know the number of abortions which are reported, not all that are done unreported and those because of ABC and by other means.The number would be astronomical in comparison to the current number.
…T/Y and you too!Thank you, allhers, for sharing the Truth. The ball is not in your hands anymore, as the saying goes. God will bless you for your efforts![]()
**And are they going to keep angry, deprived lovers and husbands in shackles every month until those precious days arrive when sex may not result in conception? Who is going to train the men?By the power of prayer and letting the Holy Spirit direct our lives, nothing is impossible with God.
The simplest method of NFP is calendar rhythm. Couples need to determine the length of the longest and shortest menstrual cycles over the past 12 months. NFP instructors can quickly teach this method to country women in developing nations, even if they cannot read, because the concepts are very easy to explain.
hli.org/index.php/component/content/article/40-facts-of-life/589-facts-of-life-chapter-22-natural-family-planning-nfp-can-be-used-for-contraceptive-motives
*I *would say……T/Y and you too!
Talk about swimming against the tide, huh?![]()
I would think that if a man also did not want pregnancy, he could love and respect his wife enough to wait.**And are they going to keep angry, deprived lovers and husbands in shackles every month until those precious days arrive when sex may not result in conception? Who is going to train the men?
Limerick**
Most, NFP is taught to both men and women together. In the case we were referring to earlier about teaching the women, I would imagine that if she explained it to her husband he’d be all for it. Afterall, they are not incapable of understanding. It’s really only like a week to nine days per month that they do not have intercourse, I think any man can accept that. If not, they would probably be the exceptions that we always have.**And are they going to keep angry, deprived lovers and husbands in shackles every month until those precious days arrive when sex may not result in conception? Who is going to train the men?
Limerick**
Its good that you talked some one out of that, I just read this about it:… I have however, talked someone out of an intended “one night stand”. In which she planned on using the morning after pill, after their encounter.,
**You and I live on opposite sides of the world!Most, NFP is taught to both men and women together. In the case we were referring to earlier about teaching the women, I would imagine that if she explained it to her husband he’d be all for it. Afterall, they are not incapable of understanding. It’s really only like a week to nine days per month that they do not have intercourse, I think any man can accept that. If not, they would probably be the exceptions that we always have.
I felt that I was encouraging you to live your faith and witness to your friends. If you felt judged because I promoted the Catholic position-and you disagree with that-I cannot retract what I was expressing out of love and concern for you. But I do pray that you would be open to the Truth that you are seeking with a sincere heart…I’m confident that Our dearest Lady, to whom you profess such loving devotion, will intercede for this special intention.. Don’t judge me, you have no idea how I live my life, and you have not heard every conversation I have had with my friends.

And all it takes is a "logical"mind to interpret them. This has nothing to do with faith, but laws of nature and objective moral order which lead to logical consequences, sometimes eventually, but still always, if they are disobeyed. So it was at the beginning and will be in the end.For discussion purposes lets accept 1) Natural moral law exists, 2) Objective natural order exists, and 3) The Church can’t modify either.
I would presume the Church could modify its understanding of that natural moral law and the objective moral order without modifying either. If natural law and objective moral order exist, then they exist regardless of the Church’s interpretation of them.
The quotes I gave explain it well. The NL can be known by reason. Every single aspect of NL may not be clear to each person so grace is needed in those particular circumstances.I’m looking for the Cathlic perspective. I don’t know what it is. You earlier said we needed the Church to correctly discern NL. Now it seems you are moving in the other direction. Hence, I ask if faith is necessary.
That makes sense. In that case we don’t need the infallible Church to tell us what NL says.And all it takes is a "logical"mind to interpret them. This has nothing to do with faith, but laws of nature and objective moral order which lead to logical consequences, sometimes eventually, but still always, if they are disobeyed. So it was at the beginning and will be in the end.
So, back to my original question. How do we know we one has correctly discerned NL? How do we know which discernment is correct when two are in conflict? How do we know a given discernment is the product of grace? How do I know your discernment of NL is correct when you state it? How do you know it?The quotes I gave explain it well. The NL can be known by reason. Every single aspect of NL may not be clear to each person so grace is needed in those particular circumstances.