Abortionist Accused of Killing Baby Born After Botched Abortion

  • Thread starter Thread starter sertelt
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
S

sertelt

Guest
Abortionist Accused of Killing Baby Born After Botched Abortion

Wichita, KS – An abortion practitioner in Kansas stands accused of killing a baby who apparently was born alive following a failed abortion procedure. Officials with the pro-life group Operation Rescue alerted LifeNews.com to the situation and said it involves infamous late-term abortion practitioner George Tiller.

Tiller runs the Women’s Health Care Services abortion center in Wichita, Kansas and often employs other abortion practitioners there on a part-time basis.

The incident saw Shelley Sella, a California abortion practitioner sometimes employed by Tiller, intentionally stab death an infant born alive during an abortion.

Read the complete story at:
LifeNews.com/state3342.html
 
This has happened before. It’s strange how it’s not even the age of the child that counts legally, nor the development, nor the mother’s opinion, nor the location of the baby in space per se, and certainly not simply the fact that a baby is a person. It’s the baby’s position relative to the mother. When else does a person’s legal right to protection from a fatal knife attack hinge on the person’s physical position relative to another person?
 
I am praying that this abortionist is prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, and his license is permanently revoked and the clinic closed forever. May God grant strength to the prosecutors and the accusers. I pray for justice for the little one whose life was taken just moments after his first breaths were taken.
😦
 
Unfortunately, stuff like this happens all the time. In a hysterotomy procedure, performed in the final trimester, the baby is delivered in a caesarean section style procedure, but the umbilical cord is cut while still in the womb. Then the baby is left in a bowl or in a corner to die of “natural causes”. This is legal because the fatal damage happens in the womb, so as long as the baby dies of that, the clinic is off the hook.

Even more appalling is the fact that pro-lifers have tried to raid clinics and take these babies. Abortionists resist these “criminal intrusions” within very sympathetic legal boundaries.
 
Politically I am very pro-choice when it concerns early trimester. I do not see it as a question of “do I want a baby” but more of “do I want to be pregnant?”

Hearing about these sorts of things makes me a lot more open to outlawing abortion. The abortion occured and it failed and the baby was born alive. It is no longer fully dependent upon its mother and she is now at the stage of answering “do I want a baby” rather than “do I want to be pregnant”. If she doesn’t want a baby she doesn’t have to have it. She can give it up for adoption or hand it over to Family Services.

This was murder. The clinic won’t be question and the doctor won’t be charged. That is wrong.
 
Rachel_J said:
Politically I am very pro-choice when it concerns early trimester. I do not see it as a question of “do I want a baby” but more of “do I want to be pregnant?”
Click to expand...
Once you realize there is no essential difference between those two questions, you’ll understand both why abortion is wrong and why those who don’t agree can feel justified doing what the abortionist did.

– Mark L. Chance.
 
Please join me in praying for an immediate end to abortion. Please take a moment now to say a prayer for all involved - the babies, the mothers and those who perform or assist with abortions.

For women who have had abortions, there is hope and healing in the church community, and that is a blessing. But for the unwanted babies, they are gone. The promise of what could have been their life was extinguished in a matter of moments.

My heart breaks for them.

I know we are all busy, but again, I urge you to please pray for an END to this evil.
 
This is horrific, but not that unusual. I know we are not supposed to discuss elections and politics here, but it should be known that one of the candidates supports this type of infanticide completely.
I could say much more, but it would violate the rules on this forum.
 
mlchance said:
Once you realize there is no essential difference between those two questions, you’ll understand both why abortion is wrong and why those who don’t agree can feel justified doing what the abortionist did.

– Mark L. Chance.
Click to expand...
I very much understand the argument for pro-life. Sometimes two poeple will be given access to the same information and come to different conclusions. This is one of those times. I disagree strongly that they are the same question.
 
I often wish that those folks who are pro-choice could see a spontaneously aborted baby even in the first trimester and tell me that it is not a person. The only thing that ever got to me in medical school was that sight. It moves me to this day.
 
Rachel_J said:
I very much understand the argument for pro-life.
Click to expand...
Obviously not, if you think there’s a difference between being pregnant and having a baby. The “logic” of the pro-abortionist is that the unborn do not merit life unless someone else says they do. Ultimately, the “logic” of this position defines merit based on time and location, neither of which are coherent criteria for determining who can or cannot be killed.

The abortionist who killed the baby born after the botched abortion indeed performed a monstrous action, but at least he has the virtue of being consistent. In his world, no baby has an intrinsic right to not be killed.

– Mark L. Chance.
 
Tiller’s actions are indicative of the “Population Control” mentality. This is uncommon in the us but has been reported in significant numbers in Asia and South America. Many of these atrocities are perpetrated by the Government and the UN.
 
mlchance said:
Obviously not, if you think there’s a difference between being pregnant and having a baby.
Click to expand...
I just love how some people have to insist that because others don’t agree with them that those people haven’t listened to their arguments or understand them. I have and I do. I just disagree with your conclusions.

Part of that reason is because you are taking my comments out of context. I did not say there was no difference between being preganant and having a baby. I said I see the question as “do I want to be pregnant” and “do I want a baby?”. These are not the same question. It is possible to have one without the other, either way. (without resorting to abortion in the case of an unwanted pregnancy). If you are going to disagree with someone you might find you have better luck if you don’t adjust what they actually said.
 
Rachel_J said:
Politically I am very pro-choice when it concerns early trimester. I do not see it as a question of “do I want a baby” but more of “do I want to be pregnant?”
Click to expand...
Seeing as how you can’t have a baby without being pregnant and in the normal course of events being pregnant leads to having a baby, it is obvious that these two things are the same.

The answers to the questions are simple - if you do not want a baby, don’t get pregnant. If you do not want to get pregnant, don’t have sex.
 
mtnutt said:
The answers to the questions are simple - if you do not want a baby, don’t get pregnant. If you do not want to get pregnant, don’t have sex.
Click to expand...
I think it’s amazing how pro-choice people say they support “a woman’s right to choose”, but they fail to realize that a woman makes that choice in the bedroom, not the abortion clinic.
 
Caesar517 said:
I think it’s amazing how pro-choice people say they support “a woman’s right to choose”, but they fail to realize that a woman makes that choice in the bedroom, not the abortion clinic.
Click to expand...
Well said.👍
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top