M
MaximilianK
Guest
I have a question about the state of soul of apostle Judas, is he in hell for all eternity,?is a council which said this? Or how we can see this thing?
Killing yourself isn’t always a mortal sin.2 mortal sins.
We simply don’t know.I have a question about the state of soul of apostle Judas, is he in hell for all eternity,?is a council which said this? Or how we can see this thing?
I think you could make an interesting argument that it might not have been a mortal sin. Grave? Yes. But, perhaps, not mortal.Given the information in the gospel, it likely was in this situation.
As a couple people already said:I have a question about the state of soul of apostle Judas, is he in hell for all eternity,?is a council which said this? Or how we can see this thing?
Agreed. The question is whether it is mortal sin in a particular case. You’re no closer to proving your assertion by pointing out the sin of despair.Giving into despair is also a sin
I think I outlined two possibilities.I just don’t see how the man who literally betrayed God, and handed him over to the Jews who have him crucified, and then proceeded to hang himself is anywhere but in hell.
And he calls Peter “Satan”. Your point, then, is…?Jesus outright tells us Judas is “lost” to Him and even calls him the “son of perdition.” (John 17:12)
Right. 'Cause, after all, Jesus never used hyperbole and other figures of speech, right?He also says it would have been better for Judas that he had not been born (Matt. 26:24). Even if you suffer the worst purgatory until the end of time, if you enter beatitude at the end it is better than non-existence. Heaven is never worse than non-existence. Hell is.
We do not make judgements but rely upon revelation. It is unknown if Judas repented before death.I have a question about the state of soul of apostle Judas, is he in hell for all eternity,?is a council which said this? Or how we can see this thing?
John 17:12I am not speaking of all of you. I know those whom I have chosen. But so that the scripture might be fulfilled, ‘The one who ate my food has raised his heel against me.’
John 18:9When I was with them I protected them in your name that you gave me, and I guarded them, and none of them was lost except the son of destruction, in order that the scripture might be fulfilled.
Matthew 26:24This was to fulfill what he had said, “I have not lost any of those you gave me.”
Psalm 41:10The Son of Man indeed goes, as it is written of him, but woe to that man by whom the Son of Man is betrayed. It would be better for that man if he had never been born.”
Even my trusted friend,
who ate my bread,
has raised his heel against me.
Interesting–can you point me to their writings on the topic? In that case, “having never been born” cannot be said to be better than anything, but Jesus says it is.Hell is better than nonexistence, saints Augustine and Damascene said this
http://www.newadvent.org/summa/1005.htmObjection 3. Further, what is the more universal is prior in idea. But goodness seems to be more universal than being, since goodness has the aspect of desirable; whereas to some non-existence is desirable; for it is said of Judas: “It were better for him, if that man had not been born” (Matthew 26:24). Therefore in idea goodness is prior to being.
Reply to Objection 3. Non-being is desirable, not of itself, but only relatively—i.e. inasmuch as the removal of an evil, which can only be removed by non-being, is desirable. Now the removal of an evil cannot be desirable, except so far as this evil deprives a thing of some being. Therefore being is desirable of itself; and non-being only relatively, inasmuch as one seeks some mode of being of which one cannot bear to be deprived; thus even non-being can be spoken of as relatively good.