F
flower_lady
Guest
I am very confused and would like to know where or if the name Jehovah is mentioned in the bible and if so where? Also where did the name Jehovah come from? Thank you.
There are several modern “worship” choruses that use the word Jehovah. (Very popular with the likes of Kenneth Copeland, etcThe origin of the word Jehovah can be traced to the late Middle Ages (around the year 1500), when Jewish scribes began inserting the vowels from the Hebrew word adonai (“my Lord”) into the name YHWH. The insertion resulted in the hybrid term YaHoWaH. Scribes wanted this new word to remind readers that God’s name was too holy to pronounce, so they should substitute adonai for it when reading biblical passages aloud. Then, when the term YaHoWaH was Latinized, the “Y” and “W” were changed to “J” and “V”–resulting in Jehovah. In other words, Jehovah is a mistransliteration, compounded by the fact that, while “J” has a “Y” sound in Latin, it has a very different sound in English–as in the word jam. Jehovah appears in no literature earlier than about the thirteenth century, and it began to be popularized in the sixteenth century by well-meaning but mistaken Christians." (Richard Abanes, The Truth Behind the Da Vinci Code, p. 19, 83)
The important thing to remember is that “Jehovah” in no way represents the name of God expressed in the ancient, original tettragrammaton YHWH. It is a made up hybrid word originating in western Europe during the middle ages. And it has never received any kind of approval to be used in any way by the Catholic Church.There are several modern “worship” choruses that use the word Jehovah. (Very popular with the likes of Kenneth Copeland, etc)
How did the KJV get to be called the “Authorized” King James Version? Who "authorized"it?The important thing to remember is that “Jehovah” in no way represents the name of God expressed in the ancient, original tettragrammaton YHWH. It is a made up hybrid word originating in western Europe during the middle ages. And it has never received any kind of approval to be used in any way by the Catholic Church.
Its appearance in the unapproved (heretical ) version of the Bible called the King James in 1611, unfortunately has left a legacy that has plagued us all ever since. With some protestant sects such as the Jehovah Wittnesses even insisting that every one should address God by this false, man made, hybrid construct.
One wonders why we should not call God Zues or Oden or for that matter Bruce Almighty, which all have about as much authority and validity as Jehovah.
King James I, the king of England and head of the Church of England at the time, authorized the translation that bears his name. It’s a beautiful work of English literature, whatever its faults as a translation.How did the KJV get to be called the “Authorized” King James Version? Who "authorized"it?I was thinking maybe we could just as well call God “Bob”.
Also why is it that some people spell God as “G–d”?
![]()
I thought the electrons on the internet never go away even when you “delete” something. Technically, only God is not perishable.King James I, the king of England and head of the Church of England at the time, authorized the translation that bears his name. It’s a beautiful work of English literature, whatever its faults as a translation.
The spelling “G-d,” as I understand it, is similar to the usage of “Lord” in place of the Divine Name. You see it frequently here in posts by our Jewish members. The idea, I believe, is never to render God’s name (or even the word “God”) completely in a perishable medium like electrons on the Internet. (As I understand it, Jewish tradition prescribes very specific treatment for any medium that bears the name of God.)
Usagi
I agree. All of those names, whether they have a basis in the Old Testament and history or not, are incomplete or shadowy representations. One group uses the word Yaweh, another Elohim, another I AM, and yet another “The God of Abraham.”Well, for me at least, ‘Yahweh’ is no more correct than ‘Jehovah’ or ‘Iehovah’ or ‘Yehowah’ (whichever you prefer).I don’t really like dissing (excuse the term) ‘Jehovah’ just because the Jehovah’s Witnesses or whatever use it nowadays. I don’t know - I find it to be a bit low an argument.
Well said, Tim. “Seek ye first, the kingdom of God.” That is who He is and that is His name.
Paul/QUOTE
Amen to that! Thank you all for your answers, now when Jehovah witnesses come to me and tell me that Jehovah is the true God, I will have some useful information to give them, some history. Before I did not know what to tell them because I didn’t know where the name came from. All that I was almost certain of was that I did not recall ever seeing the name Jehovah in the bible. Brenda (Catholic forever).
Well, for me at least, ‘Yahweh’ is no more correct than ‘Jehovah’ or ‘Iehovah’ or ‘Yehowah’ (whichever you prefer).I don’t really like dissing (excuse the term) ‘Jehovah’ just because the Jehovah’s Witnesses or whatever use it nowadays. I don’t know - I find it to be a bit low an argument.
They most probably will have already heard everything you can present them on this front. You will need much more of a defense than what has been said here. They are very persistent. Please be prepared.Amen to that! Thank you all for your answers, now when Jehovah witnesses come to me and tell me that Jehovah is the true God, I will have some useful information to give them, some history. Before I did not know what to tell them because I didn’t know where the name came from. All that I was almost certain of was that I did not recall ever seeing the name Jehovah in the bible. Brenda (Catholic forever).