W
WingsOfEagles
Guest
This is another reason for low attendance at Holy Days, I think. It was briefly mentioned at the Sunday Mass preceding the day this year, but I never remember the mention of it as a child. In fact, I feel like I was unaware of most obligatory days as a child due to “lack of advertising” if you will.Tis_Bearself:![]()
I don’t know of any diocese in Canada that abrogates the obligation to go to Mass on January 1st, but I do know that the fact that it’s a Holy Day of Obligation is never mentioned in my parish. The choir doesn’t even bother to show up for Mass. Nor do I recall it ever being mentioned in any other parish in which I’ve lived over the course of my 43 year marriage.If it’ s just a case of people partying and not coming to Mass, I do not understand why in some dioceses people are expected to just man up and get themselves to Mass (a vigil Mass if need be) and in other dioceses people are allowed to be lazy. It makes no sense. If people in Philadelphia can get to Holy Day Mass, then what makes people in Southern California so special that they’re exempt? Both areas have a ton of Catholic churches and significant traffic congestion.
I never actually knew that Christmas and New Year were HDOs until I started reading the Complementary Norms to Canon Law back when I worked in the parish office some 20 years ago (my goodness, where has the time gone!?). I only knew that I’d grown up going to Mass on both those days and I continued to do so as an adult, taking my kids with me once they came along. Christmas was a no-brainer and It only made sense to start the New Year with Mass. Never knew there was an obligation, like that of Sunday, attached to those days.