Absolute Assuance of Salvation-what does the Church teach?

  • Thread starter Thread starter NonCatholic
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
N

NonCatholic

Guest
Can a Catholic have 100% assurance of Salvation at all times?
If so or not so, then please provide sources. I’ve been searching for the answer, but too much information to decipher…need help…thanks in advance. :confused: :confused: :confused:
 
Here’s an article that has what you’re looking for:

Assurance of Salvation?
Catholics do not live lives of mortal terror concerning salvation. True, salvation can be lost through mortal sin, but such sins are by nature grave ones, and not the kind that a person living the Christian life is going to slip into committing on the spur of the moment, without deliberate thought and consent. Neither does the Catholic Church teach that one cannot have an assurance of salvation. This is true both of present and future salvation.
One can be confident of one’s present salvation. This is one of the chief reasons why God gave us the sacraments—to provide visible assurances that he is invisibly providing us with his grace. And one can be confident that one has not thrown away that grace by simply examining one’s life and seeing whether one has committed mortal sin. . . .
Likewise, by looking at the course of one’s life in grace and the resolution of one’s heart to keep following God, one can also have an assurance of future salvation.
 
Thanks for the (name removed by moderator)ut. It still doesn’t quite fulfill…in the present??/ What does that mean. I’m okay unless I do something real bad? I hope others reply as well.
In other words, if we know we are in the state of grace now, and we were to get hit by a bus today, we’d be saved.

Basically what you said is right - we’re “okay until we do something really bad” - and then we need to repent and confess it to get back to a state of grace. We are at risk of losing our salvation if we are in a state of serious sin.
 
Can a Catholic have 100% assurance of Salvation at all times?
If so or not so, then please provide sources. I’ve been searching for the answer, but too much information to decipher…need help…thanks in advance. :confused: :confused: :confused:
Having read your posts on another thread I would like to ask you to define exactly what you mean by the word “Salvation
 
Having read your posts on another thread I would like to ask you to define exactly what you mean by the word “Salvation
I’m not sure what my view on salvation has to do with the thread question, but Salvation is reconciliation with God, “right with God”; just as separation from God would be hell. In other words, if I die, I will be absent from the body and present with the Lord; not because of anything I did, but because of what He did. I love God because He first loved me.

I am convinced that RCC says one can have assurance, but there seems to be a hitch…but…but…don’t do something real bad. I’m trying to understand this and have difficulty. I don’t even know what the list of mortal sins are…some would be obvious like murder.
 
I am convinced that RCC says one can have assurance, but there seems to be a hitch…but…but…don’t do something real bad. I’m trying to understand this and have difficulty. I don’t even know what the list of mortal sins are…some would be obvious like murder.
Here you go… a good article on mortal sins with a pretty good list:

saintaquinas.com/mortal_sin.html
 
I’m not sure what my view on salvation has to do with the thread question, but Salvation is reconciliation with God, “right with God”; just as separation from God would be hell. In other words, if I die, I will be absent from the body and present with the Lord; not because of anything I did, but because of what He did. I love God because He first loved me.

I am convinced that RCC says one can have assurance, but there seems to be a hitch…but…but…don’t do something real bad. I’m trying to understand this and have difficulty. I don’t even know what the list of mortal sins are…some would be obvious like murder.
The “assurance” is that if a Catholic dies in a state of grace they will be saved but if they die in a state of mortal sin they will go to Hell.
 
The “assurance” is that if a Catholic dies in a state of grace they will be saved but if they die in a state of mortal sin they will go to Hell.
Thanks for the link. Thanks for the answers everyone; I am satisfied with the answer and matches my understanding of what the RCC teaches.
 
I am new to this forum and for that matter have not been in a
forum before this time. I am no the greatest typist.
In regards to “assurance”. I think that one should be careful
in comparing the RCC understanding to your own.
The scriptures are a powerful tool and the often the assurance
that is considered is based upon 1 John 5. The word “know” is often
stressed. I would suggest that an honest inquiry be made on how often the word “know” is used in 1 John and in what ways.
You may end up with a different view on 1 John 5 after inquiry.
Blessings,
Doolin
 
I am new to this forum and for that matter have not been in a
forum before this time. I am no the greatest typist.
In regards to “assurance”. I think that one should be careful
in comparing the RCC understanding to your own.
The scriptures are a powerful tool and the often the assurance
that is considered is based upon 1 John 5. The word “know” is often
stressed. I would suggest that an honest inquiry be made on how often the word “know” is used in 1 John and in what ways.
You may end up with a different view on 1 John 5 after inquiry.
Blessings,
Doolin
Is it a so-called (professing only-not saved) brother committing apostasy for which our prayers are pointless because God has already determined they’re going into eternal death because their unbelief is fixed? **Or is it a believer **who is a true brother who has committed a sin which so has scandalized the church, or which the Lord in His determination understands harms the testimony of the church, compromises the integrity, the purity, the holiness of the church and the Lord determines He’s had enough and the church would be better off if they were removed? Which is it? And my answer is probably both. I don’t have any way to determine which. Both are true. Which one John has in mind, he doesn’t make clear. But I know this, there is a time when people fully and finally reject the gospel. Hebrews 6, “They can never be again renewed to repentance.” So-called brothers in the church professing Christ and yet living lives of sin and they pass a point and people are still praying and praying that they’ll come back and come back and they never come back. And then they go into eternal death. They don’t necessarily die physically, but they never come back and somebody says, You know, I know it’s Your will that they come back, I know it’s not Your will that they’re in sin, and why don’t You hear and answer this prayer according to Your will? And John is saying (paraphrasing), “Here’s what you need to know, there are going to be those people who’ve reached the permanent point of eternal death and there is no point in your prayers for them, just understand that.”

The purpose of John in writing this epistle is to create certainty in our minds, the minds of true Christians, certainty about Christ, certainty about salvation and certainty about all that God has promised. The word “know” appears 39 times in this epistle. You know…you know…we know…we know. Seven times in last few verses. This whole epistle is about knowing things for certain.

On the other hand, there are believers who have engaged themselves in whatever sin to such a degree that the Lord determines in His sovereignty they are better off in heaven and the church is better off without them, compromising its testimony. And so he says when those happen, I’m simply telling you, and I love the way this is stated at the end of verse 16, “I do not say that he should make request for this.” He doesn’t command us not to pray for these people, we don’t know who they are. He just says, “I can’t tell you that you should make requests on behalf of people like that,” which is another way of saying, “Don’t expect the outcome you might otherwise expect.”
 
Thanks for your reply. This is a lot of fun.
I apologize for leading you down the path of focusing mostly on Chapter 5 of 1 John. I was not attempting to get into the detailed exegesis of this chapter.
My concern was those that hang their hat on verse 13 of Chapter 5 and yet ignor the use of “know” in verses like
3:15 “Any one who hates his brother is a murderer, and you know that no murderer has eternal life abiding in him.” Others such as versus 3:19 through 24 emphasis how we shall “know that we are of the truth”.
versus such as 5:18 “We know that any on born of God does not sin” 5:19 " We know that we are of God.
There are many more.
So be careful that we do not overemphasis 1 John 5:13 to the detriment of other versus.
Many Blessings
Doolin
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top