M
mdgspencer
Guest
There’s no small amount of soul searching that goes on when someone you love leaves the faith. You look for that moment when you guessed wrong…
It should impact us very severely if we love someone. Leaving the faith puts ones soul in grave danger for eternity, which is never ending. No one knows when their last breath will come and we pray for our children that they be in a state of being able to enter eternity with God.This article struck me as so sad, but not for the reason of the writer’s children leaving the Church.
We cannot control other people. Why would we allow the choice they make with regards to leaving a religion impact us so severely?
I know you are coming from an unsure/nonbelieving point of view but it’s just that being good will never, ever, ever get you to heaven. What is the measuring stick for good? Jesus said God alone is good.I am a good person (yes, I know many of you here hate that assessment as a measure of where someone stands with God).
Again, what is the measuring stick to know who is a good person?If you have kids that are happy and healthy (and yes, “good people”), then you have done a good job and there doesn’t need to be sadness.
Jesus is the only way to heaven.No two people journey the same way through life, and that includes spiritually.
I will agree it is better to trust in God, that He does answer prayer but there is absolutely nothing that could be sadder than someone losing their faith and dying in a state of mortal sin.Save the sadness for situations that are really sad. This doesn’t need to be one of them.
Most Catholic parents do have this hope and I realize it is hard for you to understand coming from your spiritual viewpoint but I am sure you understand that a parent always wants what is best for their child and heaven is the ultimate best.My point is just that if you believe all of your children are going to stick with the Catholic faith, just because you raised them in it, you are going to have a lot of “sadness” (or anger or whatever other way your emotions manifest themselves). I don’t think it is necessary, at all. If one truly has faith in God (speaking about Catholics, here), then a parent shouldn’t skip a beat when this happens. God created us as individuals. It is to be expected.
I would agree. A parent does not need to lay any guilt trip on their child.I know a lot of Catholic parents who walk around with this sadness, trying to burden the adult children who disappointed them with a sense of responsibility for “making their parents sad”. It is a terrible thing to do to your kids.
I would suspect that like many parents your mom prays a lot, a very lot for you and still has hope you will return to the faith, even if she is quiet about it to you. Just because we do not express our feelings and hopes to our children doesn’t mean they aren’t there.I am so glad my Mom was able to manage her disappointment so that, later in life, we have a good and healthy relationship. It was rocky at first, but she learned quickly I wasn’t going to stick around for that nonsense.
The kids will feel sadness also. That is how I felt, when I was away from the faith and knew how my parents were feeling but knowing a child is bothered by a parents sadness isn’t going to change the reality that there is a sadness every parent feels when their child is in danger.Just posing the question). All I can think about, in reading that article, is how do the kids feel reading that? It seems sort of disrespectful to me, to be honest.
Hope, not expect.On what grounds would a parent expect all
Since when does hope have to be realistic to be valid?it isn’t a realistic hope
Why not? Is it respectful to the parent’s feelings to require them to publicly repress them? Now I don’t think that it is right to use the old guilt trip on adult children who leave the Faith, but to require the parents to not express the fact that they are sad?I don’t think a parent has a right to public sadness
I don’t think it is a prudent thing to do if the parent hopes for a healthy relationship with the child they are writing about.Why not? Is it respectful to the parent’s feelings to require them to publicly repress them? Now I don’t think that it is right to use the old guilt trip on adult children who leave the Faith, but to require the parents to not express the fact that they are sad?
OK. We can go with hope. But I will counter it is an unrealistic hope, so if sadness is the result a reasonable adult should be able to recognize that fact and move on from it rather quickly.Hope, not expect.
(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.) QwertyGirl:
Depends. If the parent is constantly wailing and rending garments, etc. then yes, you have a point. this would also IMHO fall under the guilt trip thing which is almost never truly successful. But if the relationship is to be truly healthy, everyone needs to be free to express their feelings, the parent no less than the adult child.I don’t think it is a prudent thing to do
One would hope that they would not excuse the behavior. Note that I said behavior, not the original unfounded hope. Hoping is fine, what is not fine is pitching a fit when it doesn’t come to pass. And simply saying that you are sad is not pitching a fit.If a kid is hoping for a pony for their birthday, and there is no chance they are going to get one, and then the birthday comes and the kid cries and ruins the party because he didn’t get the pony he was hoping for, what do the grownups in the room do?
You see it as unrealistic because of your unbelief in Christ.OK. We can go with hope. But I will counter it is an unrealistic hope,
The hope is not in the child but the hope is in God, that God will work in that person’s life and enlighten them to the truth. If you are putting your hope in the child coming to this conclusion on their own, then yes it is unrealistic. The Holy Spirit is the one who guides.I guess I am a person who really doesn’t suffer those with unrealistic hopes or expectations lightly. To me, it smacks of irresponsibility, so this post really pushed my buttons!
So is it just the article you have an issue with? I got the sense from your posts that you objected to the parents expressing sadness at all. That’s the position I am arguing against.parent shouldn’t be writing
Our parents put us through school, don’t they? If they’re good parents, they do so not because the government says they’ll lose custody of us if they don’t, but because they want us to have the brightest possible future, which an education allows.On what grounds would a parent expect all of their children will arrive at adulthood subscribing to everying belief the parent has? I don’t get this. I understand how important a Catholic’s beliefs are to him/herself, but why would you expect your kids to buy in to all of it and subscribe to it all as adults?
A hope mustn’t be realistic in order for someone to despair when it seems it might not be achieved. As I said above, a parent might hope for their child’s material wellbeing. But what happens if their child becomes worse off than themselves when they grow up, whether it’s because of something they (the child) did, or simply the economy doing what it does? I don’t think a parent would be wrong to feel sadness about their child being in poverty, even if it might’ve been their expectation that it would happen (for whatever reason), in spite of everything they (the parent) did to try and prevent it.In my opinion, it isn’t a realistic hope. Then the sadness comes. And then one has to ask how does that impact the relationship between parent and child? I don’t think a parent has a right to public sadness over a child who leaves the Church. Were they really ever in it? (I don’t know. Just posing the question). All I can think about, in reading that article, is how do the kids feel reading that? It seems sort of disrespectful to me, to be honest.
So many relationships troubled when there is no need for them to be. That is where the sadness lies, IMO.