R
Retro_Ace
Guest
Ive noticed most of these anti-catholics have a rather Neo-Gnostic/Manichaean view on things
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Emeraldlady
New member
The legend of St Patrick converting the Celts was all about adapting pagan practices towards belief in God. We still today accept the Celtic cross as a symbol of Christianity.
My opinion of what happened when Protestantism separated itself from the Church, is it was too influenced by Renaissance goals that esteemed human intellect over spiritual wisdom and authority. That’s the genesis of the Protestant claim that Catholics are pagans. We retain the belief that the Holy Spirit is a truly present authority to be accepted as revealing the Will of God objectively. They mistakenly think that is pagan.
My opinion of what happened when Protestantism separated itself from the Church, is it was too influenced by Renaissance goals that esteemed human intellect over spiritual wisdom and authority. That’s the genesis of the Protestant claim that Catholics are pagans. We retain the belief that the Holy Spirit is a truly present authority to be accepted as revealing the Will of God objectively. They mistakenly think that is pagan.
R
Retro_Ace
Guest
An orthodox Protestant(my term for the more level-headed ones) named James Patrick Holding who runs a channel on youtube called TekTonTV said this in this in his vid where he was debunking an Fundamentalist Conspiracy nutter
“We don’t serve a God who’s symbols can be desecrated, Christ cleanses and sanctifies sinners, are we really going to argue he can’t cleanse and sanctify a symbol as well?”
“We don’t serve a God who’s symbols can be desecrated, Christ cleanses and sanctifies sinners, are we really going to argue he can’t cleanse and sanctify a symbol as well?”
B
Bon_Croix
Guest
There was a federal democratic law maker on t.v. the other day defending “curses”. “Curses are not diseases”, is what I think he said. The topic of discussion was mental health and maybe even gun control.
Are some propagating the use of witches to place curses on citizens as some means of justice? We know that the new Supreme Court Justice had curses placed on him. And now, the IRS is removing burdens for “churches” when it comes to reporting their activities, which some believe will make it easier for satanic churches to legitimately exist in society and make them a stronger societal force. What’s the Deep State up to with respect to their interpretation of the 4th Ammendment these days?
Are some propagating the use of witches to place curses on citizens as some means of justice? We know that the new Supreme Court Justice had curses placed on him. And now, the IRS is removing burdens for “churches” when it comes to reporting their activities, which some believe will make it easier for satanic churches to legitimately exist in society and make them a stronger societal force. What’s the Deep State up to with respect to their interpretation of the 4th Ammendment these days?
Last edited:
R
Retro_Ace
Guest
no clue how that relates to my post, no offense I just need you to elaborate
Z
ZMystiCat
Guest
I don’t think that person’s comment is deserving of anything more than this:anyone up for discussing this?
- Status
- Not open for further replies.