J
JMJ_coder
Guest
Suppose a person is married. They and their spouse get a civil divorce, but no annulment. One or both get civilly remarried. Is it immoral to recognize or address their new partner as their wife or husband?
Who are you talking about? Close family/friends that you would know all the details of baptismal state, first marriage, divorce, annulment, etc? If this is someone like that, I would hope you had counselled them previous to the second marriage. If they did not listen to you, you can treat them exactly as you would any other unrepentant sinner–assuming you know which among your friends that is.Suppose a person is married. They and their spouse get a civil divorce, but no annulment. One or both get civilly remarried. Is it immoral to recognize or address their new partner as their wife or husband?
Assuming that one or both of them were catholic since you say that they did not get an annulment I would say that it is immoral for that party to get remarried if indeed they should have gotten their marriage annulled. I say if because I am not sure what protestants do in regards to nullifying marriages (I think nothing).Suppose a person is married. They and their spouse get a civil divorce, but no annulment. One or both get civilly remarried. Is it immoral to recognize or address their new partner as their wife or husband?
Maybe it just means that you are being sarcastic.They are legally husband and wife, so recognize that as the state does. This doesn’t mean you condone anything, anymore than referring to your congressman as “Honorable” (since this is his/her honorific) means you truly believe he or she is necessarily honorable.