Z
Zynxensar
Guest
So I was reading up on scruples and came across the following:
“He who acts against scruples does not sin” - Fr Wigadt. From St Alphonsus’s book “The Way of Salvation and Perfection”
“The scrupulous may, and ought to, act in defiance of their misgivings, i.e their so-called conscience” - Old Catholic Encyclopedia
“Act contrary to scruples, and with a firm foot overcome them” - St Alphonsus
“The scrupulous are to act against their scruples, and plant their feet firmly in resisting them” - Gerson. From St Alphonsus’s book “The Way of Salvation and Perfection”
“He who acts against scruples does not sin” - Fr Wigadt. From St Alphonsus’s book “The Way of Salvation and Perfection”
“The scrupulous may, and ought to, act in defiance of their misgivings, i.e their so-called conscience” - Old Catholic Encyclopedia
“Act contrary to scruples, and with a firm foot overcome them” - St Alphonsus
“The scrupulous are to act against their scruples, and plant their feet firmly in resisting them” - Gerson. From St Alphonsus’s book “The Way of Salvation and Perfection”
- Do these still apply today? Has the Church’s teaching on scruples changed since then? Is acting against scruples still permitted?
- From what I’ve read so far, as long as we can identify something as a scruple, we can act against it. They say the best way to determine if something is a scruple is to ask a Priest. If I do not have access to a regular Confessor at the moment, can I ask another well-informed Catholic about whether something is a scruple?