Actual Real Aborted Baby Carried in National Pro-Abortion Parade

[He_Man]

Wouldn’t calling it a corpse infer it was a living human being at one time? They can’t have it both ways.

Much like the completely ridiculous double murder clause for pregnant mothers who are killed and lose their child. The state claims abortions is okay and not murder, but killing a child in the womb against the mothers wished is murder.

Either it is a live, and has rights, or it isn’t Stop making up garbage laws as you go.

 

[jmcrae]

Wouldn’t calling it a corpse infer it was a living human being at one time? They can’t have it both ways.

Well, supposedly the person carrying the bodies was pro-life, meaning that he should have realized that they were human corpses, and not talismans of some kind.

Either it is a live, and has rights, or it isn’t Stop making up garbage laws as you go.

I agree completely.

 

[mpb74]

I would find think most devout people, with an understanding good and evil, would be willing to have their already mutilated body carried thru the streets if it meant saving just one other person from such evil. I know that these children , who have no voices, cannot inform us of their will. Would they, without worldly human vanity, wish to save other children from the barbaric insanity of abortion? I would think so.

 

[KathleenElsie]

I would find think most devout people, with an understanding good and evil, would be willing to have their already mutilated body carried thru the streets if it meant saving just one other person from such evil. I know that these children , who have no voices, cannot inform us of their will. Would they, without worldly human vanity, wish to save other children from the barbaric insanity of abortion? I would think so.

Thank you and AMEN.

 

[Delphinus85]

If it is not a real “baby” (person) and is legally considered “tissue” or the “byproducts of conception” then it should be no more of a problem than carrying one’s removed wisdom teeth, or gall bladders stones, or a kidney. The fact that people are scandalized by it makes it obvious that everyone KNOWS it is a baby, and not any of those other things. It may be graphic, but it gets the point across.

Exactly. The pro-choice movement makes no sense to me. They say they want abortion to be “safe, legal, and rare” but almost 1/3 of all pregnancies isn’t rare. They say it’s about choice, yet they fight against all laws that would require a minimal waiting period for them to determine what they really want, and laws that wuld require the abortionist the make sure the woman knows the whole truth of the procedure (what exactly they will do), as well has her options. They say they want women to be free from male oppression, yet they support abortion which seems to be something right out of irresposible men’s heaven! (free love, and no child support!)

They don’t want women to make an informed choice. They seem to prefer abortion! (no ultrasound requirements, no waiting periods, and allowing doctors not to get full consent to the procedure by making now law that the doc has to tell the woman what he is doing) I can’t understand why they call themselves pro-choice when in all fact they don’t suppot true “choice” at all. And again with the baby thing. if it’s not a baby, why is it a scandal? They can’t seem to agree on anything.