Adam Sinless According to Sunni Islam

  • Thread starter Thread starter Irenaeus07
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I

Irenaeus07

Guest
This question is answered by Faraz Rabbani who studied with several different Islamic scholars in the Muslim world.

I have learned in the SunniPath course on the Essentials of Belief (in lesson 8, line 59 of the poem) that the Prophets (peace be upon them) were free from sin in the sense that they never disobeyed the commandments of Allaah. However, from time to time there were instances that a Prophet 'Alayhis-Salaam took the lesser course of action for which they got reprimanded by Allaah. Examples have been given… Was the expulsion of Adam and Hawwa 'Alayhimus-Salaam, from paradise a punishment from Allaah Most High ?

Answer:


In the Name of Allah, Most Merciful and Compassionate

May Allah’s peace and blessings be upon His Messenger Muhammad, his folk, companions, and followers

It is from obligatory Islamic belief that the Prophets were trustworthy and preserved from sin.

The classical definition of amana (trustworthiness), which relates to `isma (being preserved from sin) is:

“Allah Most High preserving the Prophets from falling into that which has been prohibited,” as explained by the commentators of the Jawhara. [Tattan/Kaylani, Awn al-Murid ala Jawharat al-Tawhid, 2.727; also: Bajuri, Tuhfat al-Murid]

Another definition of trustworthiness was given by the great 20th Century Hanafi scholar from Hama (Syria), Shaykh Muhammad al-Hamid in his work Rudud `ala Abatil [297, as quoted in the above text],

“It is a trait that Allah creates in His servant through which they are disposed to doing the good and that prevents them from the bad.”

The Proof for the Sinlessness of Prophets

Allah Most High has commanded us in the Qur’an to follow the Prophets in numerous verses that are decisive (qati) in their indication--such as, "These are the ones whom Allah has guided, so follow their guidance." [Qur'an, Surat al-Anam: 90]

And Allah Most High has informed us that He only commands the good, and made it clear that He does not command the wrong or sinful.

Thus, it would be absurd for Allah to command us to unconditionally follow the Prophets and to take them as absolute exemplars if they were given to sin–for this would entail us fulfilling command of Allah through something that entails committing sin.

Qur’anic Correction of Prophets

When Allah corrects the Prophets in the Qur’an, this correcting is because they exercised their judgment, but their judgment–though good, sound, and not an act of ‘disobeying’ the Divine Command–was not ultimately the optimal course of action that Allah wished from them.

Thus, Adam (peace be upon him) ate from the tree not out of ‘disobedience’ of the Divine Command but because either he didn’t think that this fell under the prohibition; or out of unawareness; or because he believed the words of the Devil, for Adam didn’t conceive of anyone in Paradise lying. Allah corrected him immediately; and made him leave Paradise to manifest the honor of moral responsibility that He had in fact created Adam and his offspring for in the first place.

Thus, the ‘descent’ of Adam and Eve (Allah bless them and give them peace) from Paradise was in fact a ‘raising’ in rank and an ultimate honor. They sought Allah’s forgiveness because of their awe of the Divine, and because of the inherent sense of shortcoming and humility that the best of creation have when they consider what is due to Allah Most High–absolutely everything.

Similarly, in every instance in which Allah Most High corrects the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) in the Qur’an, our Beloved Messenger had acted in a sound and noble manner–it is simply a case that Allah Most High wished another yet higher course of action. This manifests Allah’s divine concern (`inaya) for His Beloved (Allah bless him and give him peace), and is a lesson for all humanity to be humble before the Divine.

[See: Bajuri, Tuhfat al-Murid; Tattan/Kaylani, Awn al-Murid; Qari/Qadi Iyad, Sharh al-Shifa; Kashmiri, Fayd al-Bari ala Sahih al-Bukhari; Farhari/Taftazani, al-Nibras ala Sharh al-Aqa’id al-Nasafiyya]

And Allah alone gives success.

Wassalam,

Faraz Rabbani
 
Nice try, but Adam still disobeyed a direct order from God, this is a sin, your explanation doesnt give any reasoning to this.
Adam sinned, how can you say a direct order from God himself is not followed and it isnt a sin?
 
Nice try, but Adam still disobeyed a direct order from God, this is a sin, your explanation doesnt give any reasoning to this.
Adam sinned, how can you say a direct order from God himself is not followed and it isnt a sin?
I’m not Muslim, use to be, but going against a commandment of God is not necessarily a sin, it depends on** why **you went against the commandment of God.

Muhammad said, **“Actions are judged by intention.” **

Examples:
  1. Fasting during Ramadaan is obligatory, thus not fasting would be a sin. Lets say, during a Ramadaan, a Muslim is walking in a store and they are handing out samples of food to try and a Muslim take a sample and eats it, forgetting he was fasting. Is the Muslim sinful? No he was forgetful, thus he did not sin.
  2. Ijithad - in Islam this means the process of making an edict (rulings) not specifically mentioned in the Sacred Law, sometimes edicts are made which appear to go against Sacred Law but are based on sound reasoning. In Islam, the edicts (or rulings) of a scholar even if wrong is not sinful, in fact a scholar is rewarded for his rulings because it is based on knowledge. A sinful edict is made when a non-scholar makes an edict (ruling), even if he is right, because it is not his place to make an edict (ruling).
Thus Adam would not have been considered sinful because as a Prophet he can make edicts (rulings), his edicts was based on what he knew and understood, as Faraz Rabbani said, “for Adam didn’t conceive of anyone in Paradise lying.” So when the Devil told used Eve tell Adam these things, Adam made Ijithad and produced a ruling that eating of the fruit was permissible. Thus Adam was deceived. Adam didn’t do it with the intention to disobey God. The Devil used Eve to deceive Adam. Because he knew he could not approach Adam himself. Thus in Islam, what Adam did wouldn’t be classified as a sin according to Islamic standards. Perhap Eve sinned, perhaps Eve knew, perhaps she didn’t, if she didn’t Eve did not sin either.

So within the Islamic context, Adam is Sinless because of why he went against the commandment of God.

In Christ,

Irenaues
 
Thus Adam would not have been considered sinful because as a Prophet he can make edicts (rulings), his edicts was based on what he knew and understood, as Faraz Rabbani said, “for Adam didn’t conceive of anyone in Paradise lying.” So when the Devil told used Eve tell Adam these things, Adam made Ijithad and produced a ruling that eating of the fruit was permissible. Thus Adam was deceived. Adam didn’t do it with the intention to disobey God. The Devil used Eve to deceive Adam. Because he knew he could not approach Adam himself. Thus in Islam, what Adam did wouldn’t be classified as a sin according to Islamic standards. Perhap Eve sinned, perhaps Eve knew, perhaps she didn’t, if she didn’t Eve did not sin either.

So within the Islamic context, Adam is Sinless because of why he went against the commandment of God.

In Christ,

Irenaues
Adam’s what? “ijtihad” ? because he did not know about lying?
  1. Therefor we said: O Adam! This is an enemy unto thee and unto thy wife, so let him not drive you both out of the Garden so that thou come to toil.
  2. It is (vouchsafed) unto thee that thou hungerest not therein nor art naked,
  3. And that thou thirstest not therein nor art exposed to the sun’s heat.
  4. But the devil whispered to him, saying: O Adam! Shall I show thee the tree of immortality and power that wasteth not away ?
Another chapter says:

“Your Lord only forbade you this tree, lest ye should become angels or such beings as live forever”. Surah 7.20

Allah warns Adam not to eat from one tree, and warned Adam that satan is his adversary, and Adam knew all this beforehand, and satan reminded him of the warning yet Adam obeyed satan, and Mr. Rabbani is talking about a faulty ijtihad based on not knowing about lying?and does Mr. Rabbani believe that Muhammad at times gave faulty ijtihad?
what is worse that calling good evil and evil good.
 
But God specifically told Adam and Eve not to eat of the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil…so I don’t buy the who “Adam didn’t understand, Adam was confused, Adam was deceived” thing.

Also, the Islamic definition of a “prophet” tends to be pretty loose. What did Adam prophesy?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top