goout:
The fact that God could do something does not mean that all possibilities are reasonable within the scope of human discovery.
But the point is that if you claim God is omniscient, and all-powerful, and all-good, why WOULD he insert Adam and Eve where he did?
Why not do it the way the Bible says he did?
In other words, you all in this thread seem to agree that “adam and eve” were not necessarily human, they lived at least half a million years ago, if not more, had parents, had siblings, friends, and so forth, all of which did not have souls, all of whose genetic lines died out. THEN, you claim this proto-human, with less brain capacity than a chimpanzee, somehow realized God exists, somehow “sinned”, and that sin transferred to the rest of us by blood over hundreds of thousands of generations - many of whom suffered untold pains, fears and tragedies. Not too mention all the earlier and contemporary “humans” that suffered horribly despite never having actually “sinned”.
When asked WHY did and all-knowing, all-powerful and all-good God do it that way, especially considering that 150 years ago no one believed the above, including Jesus, Moses, the great Christian thinkers, the popes, the saints, and on and on - your response is nothing more than “Well, God works in mysterious ways”.
Can you understand the massive skepticism your position evokes?
Maybe it is time time rethink the concept of Original Sin?