AdCouncil's "Love Has No Labels"

  • Thread starter Thread starter Midwest88
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The problem is less that “Love has no labels” as it is “Sex has no limits.”
 
The purpose of this ad is obviously to normalize homosexuality. Comparing gay sex to little girls of different races being friends, or an elderly couple is silly. They are completely different situations. Nearly all of society agrees that there are some romantic relationships that we are free to "label’ as inappropriate. (ex. Incest, polygamy, adultery, underage, professional/client, etc) The authors of this ad are trying to normalize an unnatural, and inappropriate sexual relationship by comparing it to healthy sexual relationships and completely non-sexual relationships.
 
Praying. 1st for forgiveness of my own sin of disliking these ppl and 2nd for their souls for they obviously know not.
 
I liked this ad, which I saw before this thread was started. It wasn’t about morally condoning homosexual behavior, it was about respecting another’s sexual orientation, which they called “gender”; it was also about respect for another’s race, ethnicity or disability. I don’t have a problem with it at all 🤷
 
NeedsMercy said:
I liked this ad, which I saw before this thread was started. It wasn’t about morally condoning homosexual behavior, it was about respecting another’s sexual orientation, which they called “gender”; it was also about respect for another’s race, ethnicity or disability. I don’t have a problem with it at all 🤷
Click to expand...
Showing a lesbian couple kissing and then a crowd cheering and clapping for them isn’t celebratory at all. And placing the sign “love has no gender” in association with a lesbian couple doesn’t send a message that such a romantic relationship is normal. :rolleyes:

The campaign is partnered with the biggest SSM lobby group in the country (HRC) and one of the most far-left groups (SLPC), and even the gay magazine, The Advocate, referred to this as a Pro-LGBT Campaign.
 
NeedsMercy said:
I liked this ad, which I saw before this thread was started. It wasn’t about morally condoning homosexual behavior, it was about respecting another’s sexual orientation, which they called “gender”; it was also about respect for another’s race, ethnicity or disability. I don’t have a problem with it at all 🤷
Click to expand...
I’ve about had enough of everyone needing “respect”.

Respect is earned by people who live quiet, dignified lives, not because of your sexual choice, your disability, your ethnicity, race, or religion. It all just reeks of me, me, me and the self centeredness of this attitude is quite frankly repulsive…

We keep this up and it won’t be long before pedophiles demand “respect”…
 
jimcav said:
I’ve about had enough of everyone needing “respect”.

Respect is earned by people who live quiet, dignified lives, not because of your sexual choice, your disability, your ethnicity, race, or religion. It all just reeks of me, me, me and the self centeredness of this attitude is quite frankly repulsive…

We keep this up and it won’t be long before pedophiles demand “respect”…
Click to expand...
The AdCouncil is spreading propaganda. Real love does not need promotion like this, because today, in the minds of too many, love means sex, and get out when you feel like it. It’s about getting us used to that and forgetting what real love really means.

So the message is ‘sex has no labels.’ Any kind of sex.

Ed
 
jimcav said:
I’ve about had enough of everyone needing “respect”.

Respect is earned by people who live quiet, dignified lives, not because of your sexual choice, your disability, your ethnicity, race, or religion. It all just reeks of me, me, me and the self centeredness of this attitude is quite frankly repulsive…

We keep this up and it won’t be long before pedophiles demand “respect”…
Click to expand...
Amen.

And Peter opening his mouth, said: In very deed I perceive, that God is not a respecter of persons.
 
Havard said:
Showing a lesbian couple kissing and then a crowd cheering and clapping for them isn’t celebratory at all. And placing the sign “love has no gender” in association with a lesbian couple doesn’t send a message that such a romantic relationship is normal. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
It **is **“normal” insomuch as the APA has stated that homosexuality is not a mental disorder. And respecting a person’s sexual orientation, race, ethnicity or disability in this world full of hate, bigotry and bullying **is **cause for celebration.
Havard said:
The campaign is partnered with the biggest SSM lobby group in the country (HRC) and one of the most far-left groups (SLPC), and even the gay magazine, The Advocate, referred to this as a Pro-LGBT Campaign.
Click to expand...
Assuming that what you say can be verified—you should really provide a link when you make a statement like this—so what? I still see nothing wrong with the message. If the SSM, SLPC and the Advocate think it’s good to value people without considering sexual orientation, that’s fine with me.
 
jimcav said:
I’ve about had enough of everyone needing “respect”.

Respect is earned by people who live quiet, dignified lives, not because of your sexual choice, your disability, your ethnicity, race, or religion. It all just reeks of me, me, me and the self centeredness of this attitude is quite frankly repulsive…

We keep this up and it won’t be long before pedophiles demand “respect”…
Click to expand...
Homosexuality is not a choice. And no one has the right to think ill of people just because of who they are. If you think that’s selfish and repulsive, I don’t think that we here at CAF can help you, unless it’s by prayer. Do you go around dissing people because of the color of their skin or their country of origin? Do you point to special needs children and laugh? If you do, well, then, perhaps your Bible and Catechism are in need of an urgent re-read.

And, btw, some pedophiles **do **demand respect…
 
edwest2 said:
The AdCouncil is spreading propaganda. Real love does not need promotion like this, because today, in the minds of too many, love means sex, and get out when you feel like it. It’s about getting us used to that and forgetting what real love really means.

So the message is ‘sex has no labels.’ Any kind of sex.

Ed
Click to expand...
So, homosexuals never experience what you call 'real love"? Unlike all heterosexuals, who have so transcended the material world as to attain the divine…derp.
 
Sodomy propaganda video pushed on one of the largest websites in the world.

There is no gay agenda of course though.
 
Mr_Clean said:
Amen.

And Peter opening his mouth, said: In very deed I perceive, that God is not a respecter of persons.
Click to expand...
Using the NABRE, Acts 10:34-43 says
34 Then Peter proceeded to speak and said, “In truth, I see that God shows no partiality. 35 Rather, in every nation whoever fears him and acts uprightly is acceptable to him. 36 You know the word [that] he sent to the Israelites as he proclaimed peace through Jesus Christ, who is Lord of all, 37 what has happened all over Judea, beginning in Galilee after the baptism that John preached, 38 how God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the holy Spirit and power. He went about doing good and healing all those oppressed by the devil, for God was with him. 39 We are witnesses of all that he did both in the country of the Jews and (in) Jerusalem. They put him to death by hanging him on a tree. 40 This man God raised (on) the third day and granted that he be visible, 41 not to all the people, but to us, the witnesses chosen by God in advance, who ate and drank with him after he rose from the dead. 42 He commissioned us to preach to the people and testify that he is the one appointed by God as judge of the living and the dead. 43 To him all the prophets bear witness, that everyone who believes in him will receive forgiveness of sins through his name.”
Click to expand...
Verse 34 clearly does not mean what you want it to mean. In fact, it means more of what the Ad Council is trying to say. The USCCB footnote on this passage reads
The revelation of God’s choice of Israel to be the people of God did not mean he withheld the divine favor from other people.
Click to expand...
In other words, a person’s ethic origin has no bearing on his being able to hear the word of God. It has no bearing on other things either.

usccb.org/bible/acts/10
 
Needsmercy, God will not take into consideration our “circumstances”. It is clear to me the ad in question is trying to suggest we should accept homosexual relationships as being “normal”. This is not about love, its about lifestyles. We are not so dense that we need an ad to show us what love is do we? You obviously fell for it.
 
NeedsMercy said:
Homosexuality is not a choice. And no one has the right to think ill of people just because of who they are. If you think that’s selfish and repulsive, I don’t think that we here at CAF can help you, unless it’s by prayer. Do you go around dissing people because of the color of their skin or their country of origin? Do you point to special needs children and laugh? If you do, well, then, perhaps your Bible and Catechism are in need of an urgent re-read.

And, btw, some pedophiles **do **demand respect…
Click to expand...
I think this response is exactly what the makers of this propoganda want to illicit. If you believe engaging in homosexual relationships are sinful and refuse to acknowledge them as the same as a valid marriage, then it’s the same as racism or bullying disabled children. That simply isn’t true. The morality of who an adult chooses to have sex with is not even remotely close to the same as the color or ability a child is born with.
 
NeedsMercy said:
So, homosexuals never experience what you call 'real love"? Unlike all heterosexuals, who have so transcended the material world as to attain the divine…derp.
Click to expand...
There are people that are the same sex as me that I love but would never have sex with. Having sex is a personal choice. It doesn’t come from the Church or State. I don’t know when refraining from sex became bad for straights or gays.

Ed
 
Does this “no limits” include adult/child couples, or is that a limit?
 
Mr_Clean said:
Needsmercy, God will not take into consideration our “circumstances”. It is clear to me the ad in question is trying to suggest we should accept homosexual relationships as being “normal”. This is not about love, its about lifestyles. We are not so dense that we need an ad to show us what love is do we? You obviously fell for it.
Click to expand...
Those in the American Psychiatric Association who studied homosexual persons for years made a choice not based on scientific research. A vote was made in 1973 that made what was a disorder yesterday not a disorder the following day. It was instigated by closeted gays in the APA and radical gay activists on the outside.

amazon.com/Homosexuality-American-Psychiatry-Politics-Diagnosis/dp/0691028370

A similar approach was used to reclassify Transgender persons in 2013.

ncregister.com/daily-news/psychiatrys-new-normal-transgendered-persons

NO LGBT person should be bullied, abused or harmed, ever.

Ed
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top