L
lovemyboys
Guest
I have 3 children. I’d like to adopt a set of 3 siblings Would it be morally permissible to use NFP (to avoid) indefinitely if I want to adopt?
Probably but it’s an interest question.I have 3 children. I’d like to adopt a set of 3 siblings Would it be morally permissible to use NFP (to avoid) indefinitely if I want to adopt?
As long as you are open to the posibility of God calling you to conceive at any given time. If you mean can I decide six kids and I’m done then no . You have to assess your resources and God’s plan from time to time. Prayerfully. It may turn out to be indefinitely after all but you won’t know that up front.I have 3 children. I’d like to adopt a set of 3 siblings Would it be morally permissible to use NFP (to avoid) indefinitely if I want to adopt?
Thanks for sharing this. Most people are all positive about adoption,but you obviously know from experience that it can be hard…I am adopted myself, as is my sister. We are both from different sets of parents.
Please, please, please think long and hard about this. I’ve seen “Mixed” families (both adopted and biological) and it sometimes doesn’t work out for the best. It can be difficult for everyone involved.
I like the way you put this. Thanks for giving more to think about.As long as you are open to the posibility of God calling you to conceive at any given time. If you mean can I decide six kids and I’m done then no . You have to assess your resources and God’s plan from time to time. Prayerfully. It may turn out to be indefinitely after all but you won’t know that up front.
The Catholic Church teaches that the regulation of Births is a good, thus there must be an acceptable means by which this can be done. For the time being my position on NFP is that it must be permissable in this context, otherwise what means is there to regulate births short of outright abstiance. And then more over, using the “NPF should only be used in grave circomstances” logic, then one must wonder, what is the difference then between NFP and outright abstiance? Or even a more curde rythem method? I have to imagine then that they might argue that even outright abstiance should only be used for grave reasons.I don’t know if the Church has an official position on this. I would assume not since She doesn’t seem to have any official position on what constitutes a valid reason for abstaining.
That being said, opening your heart and home to these three children is an incredibly generous act of charity and I can see no logical reason why, if you feel your family is complete at 6, abstaining would be wrong.
Of course, you must continually re-evaluate your decision to limit your family size to six. While you may not now have the emotional or financial resources to sustain a family of seven or more, the pious Catholic lifestyle requires that you strive towards the goal of maximum family stability in order to welcome as many children as possible and best care for the ones you have already welcomed. Should the time come when you feel you are emotionally and financially able to welcome another child through birth or adoption the Church would encourage you to do so.
Your peace of mind may also benefit from discussing this with a good and holy priest.
God bless you for being so wonderfully generous with your time, home, and resources.
Even in the best of circumstances (which mine was, I’m the luckiest guy in the world) it can be difficult for the child, yes.Thanks for sharing this. Most people are all positive about adoption,but you obviously know from experience that it can be hard…
It’s permissible using allowed methods. It’s best not to simplify it.The Catholic Church teaches that the regulation of Births is a good, thus there must be an acceptable means by which this can be done. For the time being my position on NFP is that it must be permissable in this context, otherwise what means is there to regulate births short of outright abstiance. And then more over, using the “NPF should only be used in grave circomstances” logic, then one must wonder, what is the difference then between NFP and outright abstiance? Or even a more curde rythem method? I have to imagine then that they might argue that even outright abstiance should only be used for grave reasons.
But then, the regulation of births wouldn’t be a good as stated in the CCC would it be?
Should be noted this is just my logic, I would talk to a priest.
CCC said:2368 A particular aspect of this responsibility concerns the regulation of procreation. For just reasons, spouses may wish to space the births of their children. It is their duty to make certain that their desire is not motivated by selfishness but is in conformity with the generosity appropriate to responsible parenthood. Moreover, they should conform their behavior to the objective criteria of morality