Advice for NFP talk in parish

  • Thread starter Thread starter maendem
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
amandamay83,

You don’t understand the relationship of the trinity and how God created man and women together in his image. It is great that you are here and that you are seeking. What I would recommend are the Books by Christopher West. Look into Professor Janet Smith.

If someone had a surprise baby, after fully understanding, and following NFP, then that is an act of God. If you contracept, you are telling God he doesn’t know what he’s doing and you know better how to do it.
 
I have more questions, but I’m not sure this is the thread for it. I don’t want to hi-jack it any more than I have. I’ll start a new one. Stay tuned :cool:
 
Why don’t you answer for them why most in the medical profession will tell them it doesn’t work very well, and yet there you are telling them it does. The Mayo Clinic lists most NFP methods as under 90%. For me, this was a huge motivator to use contraception - that NFP doesn’t work very well and someone was trying to hide it. Sure I had some odd book (CCL) that told me that their studies say it works, but what was that in the face of way more people, people I trusted, saying it doesn’t? It kind of makes it hard to listen to the whole presentation from the get go if I think there is a discrepancy of facts.

I feel the same as a previous poster about the use of statistics at times. Sometimes how they are used seems not quite right, like they are being used to say more than they really imply, to persuade me, which makes me distrust the whole presentation.

Or, maybe this type of stuff was a factor years ago, but is no longer a factor? Maybe the medical profession and NFP instruction are more in sync these days.

Also, be sure they know that actual abstinence is an option. I didn’t. I’d really only been presented with two options, contraception or NFP, rather than NFP or total abstinence. Total abstinence might be more agreeable in certain circumstances.
 
Also, I know many on here have said that you should not focus on NFP as contraception, but instead emphasize that children are gifts. I disagree with this as well. .
NFP is NOT contraception. It is birth control. Birth control/spacing is allowed by the Church while contraception is not. There is a difference.
 
As someone who is just now seriously considering NFP, I want to comment on this. It really, really annoys me when priests, etc… use this statistic as “proof” that NFP is a good thing.

Use of this statistic is essentially saying, BECAUSE these couples use NFP, the RESULT is that they have more successful marriages. I feel this is a false correlation.

I would be more inclined to say that the reality is that couples who feel strongly enough about their religion to use NFP also feel strongly enough about their religion to disagree with divorce. I don’t think these couples were high-risk for divorce even before they started using NFP. I think it’s a false “if/then” correlary.

Also, I know many on here have said that you should not focus on NFP as contraception, but instead emphasize that children are gifts. I disagree with this as well. My husband and I want many children (at least 10 😊 ), but we do not want another right now. (We have two, 18 mo. and 5 mo.) Of course, if we were to conceive a child right now, we would be happy, but my/our foremost concern in considering NFP is how effective it is as a contraceptive. I’ve heard of far too many surprises on NFP to make me completely comfortable at this point. .
You do not appear to be looking at NFP with an open mind at this point. I can’t say that I can blame you for not “trusting” NFP. The problem isn’t that NFP is not trustworthy, though. It’s us. It’s us who have sex maybe a day early or late or something. Denying ourselves isn’t something our culture encourages these days.

If you don’t want to believe there is a correlation between NFP ussage and a more committed marriage that too is your right. But please don’t condem those that do. It just might be that the NFP couples know something you have not had time to experience yet. That is that NFP, God, the proper form of sex and a good marriage are all interrelated. They are supportive of each other. Not exclusive in their own separate relms.

We’ve done both ABC and NFP. We are far better off with NFP. I know it sounds rediculous, but it isn’t. It’s all about the true meaning of sex. When you are ready to move to the “next level of committment”, I hope you will read about Theology of the Body.
It’s all well and good to say that children is a blessing; they certainly are; I’m not disputing that. But I think to focus on that would be detrimental. The reality is, many of these couple are looking to avoid conception. If you can’t convince them that NFP is effective at that, you’re going to have a hard time talking them out of ABC.
You are correct here. At least for many in the class. Some may already want NFP because “them’s the rules.” But they may not know why. Again, some have to be convinced (and won’t be by this talk), and others will at least get a better understanding.
There is at least one that, if not a “surprise”, was certainly an “oops”. Of course, since she’s the NFP teacher for the parish, she will tell you she and her husband “decided” to have another child when their oldest was 14. I, for one, have a very hard time believing that. (And I think if you knew this woman, you would, too.)
This would be gossip. Believe what you want. I’m sorry you don’t trust the person, either. Again, it would seem that your doubts about NFP are screaming, here. I can assure you that there are surprise babies to parents on ABC, too.
amandamay83,
You don’t understand the relationship of the trinity and how God created man and women together in his image. It is great that you are here and that you are seeking. What I would recommend are the Books by Christopher West. Look into Professor Janet Smith.
I have to agree here and please don’t think I don’t understand where you are coming from. I was there for so many years. I read Christopher West’s The Good News About Sex and Marriage and it all began to make sense. I hope you too will read about TOB and at least give it a chance to (yes) improve your marriage. If you don’t think it needs this kind of a boost at this point, fine. Check back in about 8 years.
 
My responses in red.
You do not appear to be looking at NFP with an open mind at this point. I can’t say that I can blame you for not “trusting” NFP. The problem isn’t that NFP is not trustworthy, though. It’s us. It’s us who have sex maybe a day early or late or something. Denying ourselves isn’t something our culture encourages these days.

I’m trying to have an open mind. I really am. But every time I ask questions about NFP, I don’t get answers. Instead I get happy-go-lucky stories about the goodness of God. I KNOW God is good. I know that if it is God’s will, I will get pregnant, even with ABC. What I want to know is if NFP is a reliable means to avoid pregnancy.

If you don’t want to believe there is a correlation between NFP ussage and a more committed marriage that too is your right. But please don’t condem those that do. It just might be that the NFP couples know something you have not had time to experience yet. That is that NFP, God, the proper form of sex and a good marriage are all interrelated. They are supportive of each other. Not exclusive in their own separate relms.

I don’t deny that people who practice NFP have more committed marriages than the average couple. I still think it’s a misleading statistic. People who are willing to try NFP are likely more religious/committed to begin with. It’s not like you see people having one night stands practicing NFP. If NFP is so great, I think there should be a better way to convince people of it than by using misleading statistics.

We’ve done both ABC and NFP. We are far better off with NFP. I know it sounds rediculous, but it isn’t. It’s all about the true meaning of sex. When you are ready to move to the “next level of committment”, I hope you will read about Theology of the Body.

You are correct here. At least for many in the class. Some may already want NFP because “them’s the rules.” But they may not know why. Again, some have to be convinced (and won’t be by this talk), and others will at least get a better understanding.

So what is the point of the talk if not to convince people to use NFP? No snark intended, I’m genuinely curious.

This would be gossip. Believe what you want. I’m sorry you don’t trust the person, either. Again, it would seem that your doubts about NFP are screaming, here. I can assure you that there are surprise babies to parents on ABC, too.

It’s not gossip, I spoke to the person. She swears they decided to have another child after 14 years. And no, I don’t believe her.

I have to agree here and please don’t think I don’t understand where you are coming from. I was there for so many years. I read Christopher West’s The Good News About Sex and Marriage and it all began to make sense. I hope you too will read about TOB and at least give it a chance to (yes) improve your marriage. ** If you don’t think it needs this kind of a boost at this point, fine. Check back in about 8 years.**

I am looking looking up the book as we “speak”. I’d like to say one more thing, though, again from someone who’s still unsure about NFP: I’m not alone when I say that sanctimony is not convicing. I don’t doubt that you do know more about marriage than I do. But I know more about my relationship with my husband than you do. Neither I, nor anyone I know, appreciates the sanctimonious, “Oh, SOMEDAY you’ll understand. You’re just too young now. I am old and wise.” I don’t doubt that you’re wise, and certainly wiser than I on the subject of NFP. But no one appreciates being talked down to.
 
amandamay83,

Lets say you are standing at the coffee shop with a cup of your favorite coffee and someone approaches you and says, “You like that coffee?” Then they say, “I used to drink that. It was one of my favorites, until I tried this. You will really like this coffee.”

Would you think they were talking down to you? A lot of us have been in your shoes and we are not talking down to you. We are so excited about what we have discovered that we want to share it with you and everyone else. Once you understand the Theology of the Body, you are just in awe. I wish I had the words to explain it, but I don’t. Christopher west does though. I recommend anything he puts out. My husband is not Catholic and getting him to agree to NFP was hard. He gave me the whole “Bait and Switch” argument. He hated it. I prayed like my life depended on it and I sacrificed more than I can explain. It was dam hard and worth every ounce of all of it.
 
…Everyone in this thread so far is already completely sold on NFP. I’m just trying to offer some (name removed by moderator)ut from someone who isn’t quite there, yet…
…So what is the point of the talk if not to convince people to use NFP? No snark intended, I’m genuinely curious…
I believe the point of marriage preparation for Catholic couples should include instruction on the Church teachings about marriage.

I’m not “completely sold on NFP”–I don’t even use it. The Church doesn’t require married couples to use NFP. In fact, the Church only allows spacing of birth for “just reasons”–see CCC 2368 and the surrounding section for a fuller picture of the Church teachings on marriage. (I recommend the original poster read and pray about that whole section 2366-2379 and the Bible footnotes in it as she prepares to give her talk.)

Frankly, I think sometimes faithful Catholics get a little over-zealous pushing NFP, when not every married couple needs it. Sometimes couples postpone or avoid pregnancy without a good reason. That often corrects over time; if a couple doesn’t have a “just reason” to avoid pregnancy, they may engage in sexual relations during the woman’s fertile time–and God may bless them with another child.

One of the nice things about NFP is the couple can usually “quit” at anytime. Contraception isn’t as easy to break away from–and believe me I know that from personal experience. My husband and I found the abstinence required for effective NFP difficult–probably in large part because we used contraception for many years. Eventually, we re-evaluated our situation and decided not to use NFP.
 
Thanks for the continued (name removed by moderator)ut. These are all
important perspectives for us to consider as we prep, especially (Amanda’s?), since most of the couples we are talking to are not “there yet” either. We want to meet their concerns with not only charity but honesty.
 
My rebuttal.
Originally Posted by newbetx forums.catholic-questions.org/images/buttons_cad/viewpost.gif
*You do not appear to be looking at NFP with an open mind at this point. I can’t say that I can blame you for not “trusting” NFP. The problem isn’t that NFP is not trustworthy, though. It’s us. It’s us who have sex maybe a day early or late or something. Denying ourselves isn’t something our culture encourages these days.

I’m trying to have an open mind. I really am. But every time I ask questions about NFP, I don’t get answers. Instead I get happy-go-lucky stories about the goodness of God. I KNOW God is good. I know that if it is God’s will, I will get pregnant, even with ABC. What I want to know is if NFP is a reliable means to avoid pregnancy.*

You may not believe this, but I don’t like being told stuff like that, either. And it shouldn’t be any secret that NFP doesn’t prevent pregnancy either. It’s abstinence. Something many think of as a disease, not a strength. The “doing of somthing takes strength. Not doing something is weakness.” So here, someone gave us this article to read that isn’t so “happy go lucky.” NFP takes strength. So does marriage and raising kids. So really, it’s no coincidence that couples that are are strong can use NFP and have a more committed and loving marriage. OK, if you don’t like “cause and effect” maybe a symbiotic relationship is better. But I’d have to say that chastity within a marriage (cause) will lead to a more respectful relationship (effect). Respect strengthens the relationship. Sacrafice is a powerful way to show love and respect. Sacrafice isn’t respected as much as it used to be, either. So while some would like to say that these folks wouldn’t end up like half the other couples if they had ABC… My experience says that is unlikely.
**
Reliability is usually measured in percentages. I think there are several different stats out there. In the final analysis, what IS a pregnancy for the couple? With an NFP couple with the proper marital attitude, there may be some “surprises” or “oops”. But they are still loved as gifts. Not treated as a “failure.” Our NFP counsellor was outrageous enough to tell us “If you use NFP and get pregnant, NFP didn’t fail, you were trying.” I fumed over that for years. She wasn’t exactly wrong, but it was arrogant. Here again is an example, that, for some reason, people think NFP is “Catholic Contraception.” That was how it was sold to us. THAT use of NFP is abuse (IMO) because the meaning of sex is still “just sex” for these people. There’s way more to it than that. What did I know then? I know I thought I knew it all. *
**
And, no. NFP isn’t for everyone. There are a few “super fertile” or those with other issues that make determining fertility almost impossible. For these folks, Dad should just learn to do without that method of loving for a while. Abstinence isn’t the deadly killer some boys make it out to be. And I find it disturbing that couples wait until they’ve “had enough” kids to start the program. A woman should start working with NFP before she even gets married, even if she doesn’t think she’ll ever need it. NFP methods provide information. Information isn’t evil. If it weren’t for NFP charts, we probably would have not known that DW was having ovarian cyst problems for a short while. It got her to the right doctor in three months. Without charts, who knows?
*
It’s not gossip, I spoke to the person. She swears they decided to have another child after 14 years. And no, I don’t believe her.


:rolleyes: Listen to yourself, please.
*

I am looking looking up the book as we “speak”. I’d like to say one more thing, though, again from someone who’s still unsure about NFP: I’m not alone when I say that sanctimony is not convicing. I don’t doubt that you do know more about marriage than I do. But I know more about my relationship with my husband than you do. Neither I, nor anyone I know, appreciates the sanctimonious, “Oh, SOMEDAY you’ll understand. You’re just too young now. I am old and wise.” I don’t doubt that you’re wise, and certainly wiser than I on the subject of NFP. But no one appreciates being talked down to.*
**
Used to be that those with experience were sought out and looked up to. Because experience is valuable. Not so much anymore. Anyone with a blog is an expert now (if what they say one agrees with anyway.) And I do remember how arrogant and smart I thought I was 20 years ago. At the time I called it “confident and knowlegable.” While I don’t know you or your husband, I know a mistake we made years ago that almost killed our relationship. In fact, every relationship I ever had that was good ended up ruined by ABC. I call it the “ABC mentality.” “Sex is better, and more important, than pregnancy.” Through His grace I became aware of the mistake of the ABC mentality. I wish you didn’t think that anyone trying to convince you not to make the same mistake is “sanctimonious.”
**
*I assure you that I changed my “coffee” and think everyone else should too. TOB IS for everyone. *.
 
Thanks for the continued (name removed by moderator)ut. These are all
important perspectives for us to consider as we prep, especially (Amanda’s?), since most of the couples we are talking to are not “there yet” either. We want to meet their concerns with not only charity but honesty.
You know, the more I think on this, the more important it is to have a TOB talk prior to the NFP talk. Any chance of that happening?
 
Funny you mention that - there isn’t much chance of doing a complete TOB talk prior, but we have decided to make the entire 1st portion of our talk TOB… because THAT’S what attracted us to NFP, not the other way round 👍 NFP is just sort of the tip of the “iceburg” (wish there were positive term) of the Church’s teaching on marriage and sexuality.
 
Funny you mention that - there isn’t much chance of doing a complete TOB talk prior, but we have decided to make the entire 1st portion of our talk TOB… because THAT’S what attracted us to NFP, not the other way round 👍 NFP is just sort of the tip of the “iceburg” (wish there were positive term) of the Church’s teaching on marriage and sexuality.
Yes, NFP is much more understandable once TOB is embraced. And there is no way to get TOB into anyone in 10-15 min, either.

Our parish gave every engaged couple a copy of TGNAS&M when they came to visit the priest the first time. A great idea if you ask me. No, you can’t make them read it and you can’t make them understand it. “You can lead a horse to water…” is all that WE can do. Plant seeds and hope they don’t get choked out by weeds.
Peace be with you!
 
Christopher West has several CDs out. Is there any way you can require them, as part of the program, to listen one of his CDs? Maybe he has some DVDs.
 
The CDs would be a great idea; however, we have been asked in as guest speakers, so we can’t require this, and I imagine most couples are balking anyway at sitting in on our talk…
 
The CDs would be a great idea; however, we have been asked in as guest speakers, so we can’t require this, and I imagine most couples are balking anyway at sitting in on our talk…
I can imagine…

Sigh,
Maybe the best thing is to just intro with “In the beginning it was not so.” reading. Hopefully that could end up being good seed to plant as to why TOB should be important to them. After that, some details about NFP methods and some references from the CCC will be food for thought.

I bet we could come up with some great on-line resouces about TOB and NFP. Put that in a handout and give it to them for reference.
 
I have heard some open with asking the couples to “think outside of the box.” NFP is so different from anything else that is widely accepted.
 
As someone who is just now seriously considering NFP, I want to comment on this. It really, really annoys me when priests, etc… use this statistic as “proof” that NFP is a good thing.

Use of this statistic is essentially saying, BECAUSE these couples use NFP, the RESULT is that they have more successful marriages. I feel this is a false correlation.

I would be more inclined to say that the reality is that couples who feel strongly enough about their religion to use NFP also feel strongly enough about their religion to disagree with divorce. I don’t think these couples were high-risk for divorce even before they started using NFP. I think it’s a false “if/then” correlary.
I disagree. This is a valid reason to learn and use NFP. NFP promotes communication and the communication isn’t always about sex. It prompts couples to be more open about finances, emotional struggles, and other areas as well.

The fact that you are a devout / religious couple does play a role. That is true, but it isn’t the only factor.

I just taught a class, and one of the couples said they were there because of that quote. . . the success of marriages.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top