K
KittenHash
Guest
I came across this post today and thought it would really bring a refreshing perspective…
catholicnewsagency.com/document.php?n=999
catholicnewsagency.com/document.php?n=999
It is a medical fact that women do not have to have orgasms to conceive. None of my four children were conceived in intercourse that involved me climaxing.Has something you’ve read persuaded you to your view. Do you see an error in JP2’s reasoning that arrived at a different conclusion?
Sex during infertile times is also not required for conception, yet it is a good thing, and pleasurable. Why is that?
Why are women capable of orgasms at all given your comment that they have no relevance to procreative sex?
10/10 for trolling effort.It is a medical fact that women do not have to have orgasms to conceive. None of my four children were conceived in intercourse that involved me climaxing.
Yes, sex during infertile times is not required for conception, but is pleasurable. I do not believe that couples should have sex when they believe the wife is infertile, because it is pleasure without the prospect of creating a new life.
Human beings are capable of all kinds of selfish, sinful things. The female orgasm is just one of them.
And yet the Church does not share your view, because sex during infertile periods is still both procreative and unitive, that is, it does have the prospect of creating new life, and it is for pleasure, which is encouraged for married couples.Yes, sex during infertile times is not required for conception, but is pleasurable. I do not believe that couples should have sex when they believe the wife is infertile, because it is pleasure without the prospect of creating a new life.
Myself and my fiancé are open to anything and do not want to have our sex life unnecessarily limited due to misconceived ideas.Would you view anal sex as a loving, tender, marital act?
As I said in my first reply, make sure your fiancée is actually open to these things. Discuss it. Even pray about it. She may want to make sure that she doesn’t seem frigid or puritanical, when really some things squick her out. A lot of women feel degraded by some of the things you’ve mentioned, and until pornography use became widespread I honestly don’t think a lot of couples even dreamed of doing some of the things you can see there (and can’t unsee).Myself and my fiancé are open to anything and do not want to have our sex life unnecessarily limited due to misconceived ideas.
Does anyone have any clear answers on sex toys, oral sex and anal sex? I seem to not have had any definitive responses yet. Does it therefore seem best to read various books on Catholic marital sex? Will they actually give me a clear answer?
I get the feeling like I will never know and that perhaps the best thing would be to just do what I think is best around the following guidelines and seeing how we feel as a married couple:
• NFP method.
• Ensure that I finish inside my future wife.
• Allow my wife to climax as part of the whole sexual event but not necessarily at the same time that I climax (before or after).
At this moment in time, unless clearly informed it is otherwise definitely incorrect by any valid viewpoint, I will follow the above bullet points and also experiment with sex toys, oral sex and anal sex (with lubrication and a condom) as part of foreplay.
I will read various books and also be open to hearing what anyone else has to say on here; hopefully, we can limit the posts to sources from the bible, Catechism or quotes from respectable Catholic figures.
I guess then you believe couples have a duty to be aware of their fertility - because to remain blissfully ignorant would give yourself the opportunity of having sex more than half the time when conception was not possible, which you regard as selfish pleasure-seeking! So, this would mean limiting sex to a week or so before ovulation and at most a day or so after.It is a medical fact that women do not have to have orgasms to conceive. None of my four children were conceived in intercourse that involved me climaxing.
Yes, sex during infertile times is not required for conception, but is pleasurable. I do not believe that couples should have sex when they believe the wife is infertile, because it is pleasure without the prospect of creating a new life.
Human beings are capable of all kinds of selfish, sinful things. The female orgasm is just one of them.
Absolutely. But absent a rule to follow, you are going to have to act according to your personal assessment. So, I was just asking whether you feel anal sex (as foreplay) is a loving, tender, marital act? I personally can’t see how my wife’s anus could have any role in our love-making, but that’s me.Myself and my fiancé are open to anything and do not want to have our sex life unnecessarily limited due to misconceived ideas.
For the record: is all sex between married couples required to be “tender”?Would you view anal sex as a loving, tender, marital act?
The OP might benefit from thinking through this question too. He might feel two out of three is OK. I just want him to think about what he’s doing in the bedroom, rather than just ruling in everything that the “rule book” hasn’t ruled out.For the record: is all sex between married couples required to be “tender”?
None of these activities would violate the Church’s objective moral teaching on sexuality between married couples.Would anal sex (with a condom), sex toys and oral sex be permissible in foreplay within the 3 rules? Is there anything from the Church specifically writing on this kind of foreplay?
Catholic teaching on sexuality is based on the inherent meaning of the sexual act, and is not dependent on whether the couple is potentially fertile at a particular moment or not. Whether the couple is able to great pregnant at a particular moment or not (e.g., because the wife is pregnant, post-menopausal, or the husband is medically infertile) the principles regarding married sexuality are the same. Sex, in all circumstances, is designed to be unitive and procreative. Therefore, the three rules apply when the wife is pregnant as well.As a follow-up to this, do the same “rules” apply when you are already pregnant? We are pregnant with our 3rd and found out I have placenta previa. Because of this we are not suppossed to have intercourse, likely for the remainder of the pregnancy (~6 months), but minimally for 3 months until the next sonogram when we’ll see if the placenta has moved. Thanks for your help!
This is excellent advice.But “there isn’t a rule about it” doesn’t mean that it’s a good idea for every couple in every marriage in every part of their married life.
As others have mentioned, contrary to popular belief, the Catholic “rules” on what is and is not allowed between a husband and wife are very limited. Most things are not against the objective “rules.” However, just because it is not against the rules, does not mean doing so would be helpful for a marriage or would be loving to the spouse.Myself and my fiancé are open to anything and do not want to have our sex life unnecessarily limited due to misconceived ideas.
Does anyone have any clear answers on sex toys, oral sex and anal sex? I seem to not have had any definitive responses yet. Does it therefore seem best to read various books on Catholic marital sex? Will they actually give me a clear answer?
I get the feeling like I will never know and that perhaps the best thing would be to just do what I think is best around the following guidelines and seeing how we feel as a married couple:
• NFP method.
• Ensure that I finish inside my future wife.
• Allow my wife to climax as part of the whole sexual event but not necessarily at the same time that I climax (before or after).
At this moment in time, unless clearly informed it is otherwise definitely incorrect by any valid viewpoint, I will follow the above bullet points and also experiment with sex toys, oral sex and anal sex (with lubrication and a condom) as part of foreplay.
I will read various books and also be open to hearing what anyone else has to say on here; hopefully, we can limit the posts to sources from the bible, Catechism or quotes from respectable Catholic figures.
OK, I was just wondering where the “tender” part came from. I had never heard that.The OP might benefit from thinking through this question too. He might feel two out of three is OK. I just want him to think about what he’s doing in the bedroom, rather than just ruling in everything that the “rule book” hasn’t ruled out.
Surely a married couple who are completely open to life can choose to have potentially procreative sex whenever they like (they don’t need to consider issues of fertility) but to choose to do so only when the wife is believed to be infertile is essentially to practice NFP, which is acceptable, but only if they themselves believe they have justified reasons.I guess then you believe couples have a duty to be aware of their fertility - because to remain blissfully ignorant would give yourself the opportunity of having sex more than half the time when conception was not possible, which you regard as selfish pleasure-seeking! So, this would mean limiting sex to a week or so before ovulation and at most a day or so after.
It would also be necessary to abstain from sex during pregnancy and to end their sex life at menopause for the same reason - it would be selfish pleasure-seeking.
These are unique ideas. They are not taught by the Church. Are they entirely your own ideas, or did they come to you from parents or another source?
Yes. The poster to whom I was responding seems to have some other ideas.Surely a married couple who are completely open to life can choose to have potentially procreative sex whenever they like (they don’t need to consider issues of fertility) but to choose to do so only when the wife is believed to be infertile is essentially to practice NFP, which is acceptable, but only if they themselves believe they have justified reasons.