D
djames99
Guest
Increasingly on Catholic forums, I note more criticism being given to some posters.
has it is. Not all posters have literary expertise and experience, and it may not be his particular charism, so some leeway should be considered in that regard. His view is that every subject presents with the possibility there is something to fix, and he tells him how to do that as quickly as possible. He will tell them outright that leaving the Catholic Church was a mistake, that there parents were right all along in his being baptized. He will tell him possible uncomfortable but truthful things he may not want to broach, ambiguity nowhere evident. The ills he presents are for the most part the consequence of leaving the Church and it’s traditions, and becoming close to secular ideas made it worse. His words hurt only because they give the subject work and something he needs to do. It is an immaturity of sorts.
posters here, and will give us a few pointers on how we should approach subjects, and the new perspective on our attitudes to treatment.
Code:
Top on the list of complaints is that the poster's therapy lacks a sensitivity. In this way of thinking the primary goal is to gain a friend, or don't lose one at all costs, and not say anything that will cause him to go on his way. The subject comes to the forum 'door', and along with him is the baggage of errors he does not want to let go of, and which is partly the effects of his wrong decisions. He usually states this is the condition for further discussion, like it or not. An analogy is a person who presents to a psychiatrist that he impulsively likes to shoot at any object in his back yard. He sets the conditions first off that he is unwilling to detach himself from guns. There is no guarantee of success for the poster, just has there was none when advice to a rich man that his remedy was to leave his baggage behind if he wanted to attain heaven.
This is an approach the Church no longer wants us to use. She doesn't want the 'wishy-washy all comfie in the tummy' approach to advice giving, the patient driving the therapeutic bus as it were. We are to be polite, respectful in the true definition, and not a gauge on how close to agreement we are to the subject. This attitude is part of political correctness, that sacrifice of truth for the sake of human relationship, conformation for the sake of conformation.
Typically, these subjects come to the forum writing they are trying to remain close to the Church and so we should pass on saying anything that will upset him. It is not a question of point of view, and the subject doesn't understand this(or does, but likes to play it up for all it's worth knowing someone will dispute the poster's opinion and perhaps a consensus for his case is what is hoped for.)
Catholics should remember they don't make policy, nor is their life a guide for others. The latter is a practice fraught with danger. Given a poster leads a life of virtue, still, he does not know the state of his soul.
On the other hand is the poster who gets to the point, is non ambiguous and will tell it
Code:
The poster agrees to help because through love he sees his fellow man has a work in progress.
In closing I feel this PDF article which speaks of pastoral style is good for the [www.sensustraditionis.org/PhilManPastoral.pdf](www.sensustraditionis.org/PhilManPastoral.pdf)