G
gilliam
Guest
When Pope Benedict XVI was presented to the world on April 19, some Catholics were a little dismayed by one part of his greeting: “The Lord will help us, and Mary, his most holy mother, will be alongside us.”
For liberal Catholics of a certain age — my age — any mention of Mary can be cringe-making. I was appalled, as a post-Vatican II Catholic schoolboy, when my mother passed along a secret about salvation that her mother had imparted to her: “If Jesus won’t let you in the front door of Heaven, Mary will let you in the back door.”
Charlene Spretnak has a term for Catholics like me: “minimalist Marians.” Spretnak, a professor at the California Institute of Integral Studies in San Francisco, is the author of “Missing Mary: The Queen of Heaven and Her Re-Emergence in the Modern Church.” She takes pity on Catholics who were raised after Mary was “shrunken and suppressed” by the Second Vatican Council of the 1960s. “I … have developed a properly ‘bad attitude’ about the church’s drastic reduction of Marian spirituality,” Spretnak writes. “The Roman Catholic Church … had always recognized not only the biblical dimensions of Mary, as do the Protestant and Orthodox branches of Christianity, but also what could be called the biblical-plus perception of her, as do the Orthodox. That is, the church traditionally held that the Virgin Mary, by virtue of her inherent role in the Incarnation, was an expansive bridge between humans and the Divine.”
(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com …
For liberal Catholics of a certain age — my age — any mention of Mary can be cringe-making. I was appalled, as a post-Vatican II Catholic schoolboy, when my mother passed along a secret about salvation that her mother had imparted to her: “If Jesus won’t let you in the front door of Heaven, Mary will let you in the back door.”
Charlene Spretnak has a term for Catholics like me: “minimalist Marians.” Spretnak, a professor at the California Institute of Integral Studies in San Francisco, is the author of “Missing Mary: The Queen of Heaven and Her Re-Emergence in the Modern Church.” She takes pity on Catholics who were raised after Mary was “shrunken and suppressed” by the Second Vatican Council of the 1960s. “I … have developed a properly ‘bad attitude’ about the church’s drastic reduction of Marian spirituality,” Spretnak writes. “The Roman Catholic Church … had always recognized not only the biblical dimensions of Mary, as do the Protestant and Orthodox branches of Christianity, but also what could be called the biblical-plus perception of her, as do the Orthodox. That is, the church traditionally held that the Virgin Mary, by virtue of her inherent role in the Incarnation, was an expansive bridge between humans and the Divine.”
(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com …