F
fishstick
Guest
Please excuse my spelling if it is off as it has been a bit of a long day for me. However, reading many of the posts of this community I have come to realize you all are certainly intellegent and mature characters, at least the majority of you. Now, after seeing quite a lot of posts about atheism and it’s logic, I would like to see an argument presented that makes it more logical then Agnosticism. As an agnostic I of course would have a bias even if I don’t realize it conciously but I try to look at things skeptically and with reason. From my standpoint it seems to be the most logical take out of the big three, with organized religion being the least logical (no offense catholics, if anything I find you to be a bit more logical then most :]). However I would still think that maintaining the philosophy that everything in the world “just happened” is rather contradictory towards many schools of logic and that an undefined supernature is in fact the most logical explanation.
I know this seems quite a vague starting topic, but I want to leave a few doors open, for starters I’d like to focus on creationism here. What is the atheist argument for what we are doing here besides stochastic quantum fluctuations?
I know this seems quite a vague starting topic, but I want to leave a few doors open, for starters I’d like to focus on creationism here. What is the atheist argument for what we are doing here besides stochastic quantum fluctuations?