H
HagiaSophia
Guest
Some of the theories reported on seriously by Al-Jazeera include:
The weapons-testing theory holds no water, he says, because of the amount of energy needed to cause such a quake.
“You would need a very huge amount of energy. It’s impossible. A billion tons could not do it,” he told Al-Jazeera.
Bautisda admits that wave activity might be triggered very close to the scene of a giant explosion, but the effect would only be a tiny fraction of the tsunamis that hit the Asian coastline on Dec. 26.
“It’s possible to cause vibration, but not sufficient to cause disruption,” he said. “We can tell the difference between an artificial explosion and an earthquake. The mechanisms are different.”
worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=42271
- The U.S. government knew of the disaster ahead of time and failed to warn Asians in affected countries, as evidenced by the American Navy base situated on the Indian Ocean island of Diego Garcia that was alerted and escaped unscathed from the effects of the tsunamis;
- Indian and U.S. military testing of weapons using electromagnetic waves triggered the earthquake;
- Aliens caused the disaster as a way to correct the planet’s “wobbly” rotation;
- The Australian and Thai governments deliberately failed to respond to warning of the impending earthquake.
The weapons-testing theory holds no water, he says, because of the amount of energy needed to cause such a quake.
“You would need a very huge amount of energy. It’s impossible. A billion tons could not do it,” he told Al-Jazeera.
Bautisda admits that wave activity might be triggered very close to the scene of a giant explosion, but the effect would only be a tiny fraction of the tsunamis that hit the Asian coastline on Dec. 26.
“It’s possible to cause vibration, but not sufficient to cause disruption,” he said. “We can tell the difference between an artificial explosion and an earthquake. The mechanisms are different.”
worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=42271