Alcohol

  • Thread starter Thread starter Blood_Angel
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I would say that excess in itself is not grave, but that it is grave actions that are committed (while under the influence of alcohol or not) which are grave.

.
Excess in alcohol can YES be grave matter (drunkness for pleasure to point of loss of reason-- as opposed to medical use in say perhaps having your foot cut off in the wild…)
 
and which of these are we allowed to indulge in ,as long as we don’t "over do it "
The effects of alcohol are on a continuum. The effects start from the moment you take a sip of alcohol.

We are not a teetoaling Church, Christ himself was not a teetotaler, He drank alcohol. Indeed he provided more alcohol with His first miracle, after they had ran out of alcohol at the wedding.

So yes, we are allowed to drink and experience the effects of alcohol, so long as we don’t overdo it.
 
the question is how does the Church define drunkenness
Does the Church define drunkenness?

Since it is not the alcohol itself, or the effects of alcohol that can logically be described as being sinful, it would seem logical that drunkenness is a state of being where the person is unable to distinguish right from wrong. When alcohol alcohol affects a persons’ judgement to the point where they do not have a grasp on morality or they are not in control of their actions, then that would seem to be a reasonable definition of drunkenness. Getting a bit merry, relaxed and having a good-natured laugh with friends (even though considerably over the drink-driving limit) hardly classifies as ā€˜drunkenness’. The sinfulness of drinking is the actions that may be committed as a result of a judgement so clouded by alcohol that right is not distinguishable from wrong. Light-headedness, increased ā€˜conversation’, slurring of speech, and a bit of light staggering are not in themselves sinful actions.
 
Does the Church define drunkenness?
Catholic Moral Theology has defined such for centuries…

Intemperance is of degrees. Yes excess in drinking alcohol is sinful.

And such is not just in relation to any other ā€œactionsā€ that may occur.

And not just when one is not able to distinguish right from wrong (that would very excessive to say the least).

There is excess in drinking alcohol (intemperance) that is venially sinful and that which is mortally sinful.

Does that mean one is not to enjoy a glass or so of say wine? Or have some chartruse? That such is contrary to temperance? No. But moderation is key.

Let us live the virtue of temperance. šŸ™‚
 
Catholic Moral Theology has defined such for centuries…(I have noted what that is above).
No you haven’t. You haven’t shown any definition of drunkenness. You’ve shown where the Church says that drunkenness is wrong but nowhere where drunkenness is defined.

The effects of alcohol are a continuum and take effect from the first drink.
Intemperance is of degrees. Yes excess in the alcohol is sinful. And not just when one is not able to distinguish right from wrong (that would very excessive to say the least).)
Really? And what constitutes excess?

It is not the consumption of alcohol itself (or the effects of alcohol) but the actions that may result from the consumption of too much alcohol that constitutes the sin.
There is excess in drinking alcohol (intemperance) that is venially sinful and that which is mortally sinful.
And what constitutes excess drinking? 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10… drinks? It is impossible to draw the line simply when it comes to the amount of alcohol drunk, or the level of effect of alcohol (since alcohol takes effect before the first glass is finished). The line can be drawn, however where the amount drunk directly leads a person to sin, or to be in a position where they cannot distinguish right from wrong. This depends on the person and his ability to manage the effects of alcohol.
Does that mean one is not to enjoy a glass or so of say wine?That such is contrary to temperance? No. But moderation is key.
And what about a person enjoying three, four, five, six, seven, eight … glasses of wine?
Let us life the virtue of temperance. šŸ™‚
Temperence is a virtue, but it applies as much to food as it does to alcohol. How many people seem to criticise the amount of food eaten by people at Christmas, Thanksgiving etc?
 
No you haven’t. You haven’t shown any definition of drunkenness. You’ve shown where the Church says that drunkenness is wrong but nowhere where drunkenness is defined

Yes have noted regarding what Catholic Moral Theology would say is mortal sin…and what is venial

The effects of alcohol are a continuum and take effect from the first drink.

Really? And what constitutes excess?

That which is contrary to the virtue of temperance

It is not the consumption of alcohol itself (or the effects of alcohol) but the actions that may result from the consumption of too much alcohol that constitutes the sin.

Both. Excess in the consumption of alcohol is sinful in the excess --prior to any other aspects.

And what constitutes excess drinking? 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10… drinks? It is impossible to draw the line simply when it comes to the amount of alcohol drunk, or the level of effect of alcohol (since alcohol takes effect before the first glass is finished). The line can be drawn, however where the amount drunk directly leads a person to sin, or to be in a position where they cannot distinguish right from wrong. This depends on the person and his ability to manage the effects of alcohol.

On lower level - there is not a particular ā€œnumberā€ -the virtues of prudence and temperance -taking into account the person etc must judge. What is venially contrary to temperance for me may not be for you…

Temperence is a virtue, but it applies as much to food as it does to alcohol. How many people seem to criticise the amount of food eaten by people at Christmas, Thanksgiving etc?
Yes it is and yes it does.

How many criticise the amount of food eaten then? Interestingly one of the readings at Mass for Christmas are about temperance…

and I do at times mention such;)… (starting with myself!).

(note too that individual acts of intemperence in food are usually venial…where as many in society make it a goal to get quite drunk… .)
 
(note too that individual acts of intemperence in food are usually venial…where as many in society make it a goal to get quite drunk… .)
And so intemperence in food is less sinful than intemperence in drink? What about people who sit down with the clear intention of eating a huge amount of food? How is that worse than someone sitting down with the intention of drinking a huge amount of drink? It that simply because alcohol has an effect on the body that food does not? Why is that an issue if a person can manage these effects so that they do not lead him into sin? Chemical effects on the body are not in themselves sinful. And from health grounds, and harm to society, obesity presents more damage to health and is a bigger killer than alcohol. Yet lack of temperence in food is less sinful? :confused: That makes no sense whatsoever.
 
And so intemperence in food is less sinful than intemperence in drink?
Yes often.

Excess in alcohol and excess in food is yes both disordered. Both contrary to temperance.

And yes people are more apt to commit mortal sin via alcohol (how in our culture may set out to be very drunk? --to many) than food.

Reason, the virtue of temperance, and good judgement of conscience can guide one in ones eating and drinking alcohol. Though it is to be noted that what is contrary to temperance for one is not for another and as at least one Saint reminds us–this is a area that is a difficult one where many struggle.

And I would say that the measure of such can be effected to by the occasion - what is reasonable on say a feast is different than ordinary life.

Individual acts of overeating…intemperance are ā€œordinarilyā€ a ā€œvenial matterā€ for venial sin…

Now certain uncorrected habits that cause at least in the short term serious problems can become grave…like perhaps your doctor tells you if you keep eating 7 pieces of cake a day you will seriously harm your health or drop dead…in say three months.

The best example intemperance that is grave matter…would being drunk to the point of one losing ones reason …(outside say them having to cut your foot off out in the wild…)
 
Yes often.
And yes people are more apt to commit mortal sin via alcohol (how in our culture may set out to be very drunk? --to many) than food.
A great many people can get drunk (often considerably drunk) and still be in control of their reason regarding committing mortal sin. Some people are much better at managing the effects of alcohol than others.
And I would say that the measure of such can be effected to by the occasion - what is reasonable on say a feast is different than ordinary life.
And presumably the same would apply to the much greater consumption of alcohol on a special ocassion, Christmas, weddings, New Year’s Eve etc.?
Individual acts of overeating…intemperance are ā€œordinarilyā€ a ā€œvenial matterā€ for venial sin…
As are individual acts of over-drinking as most people when drunk do not commit mortal sin or lose their reason. Slurring of speech, talking too much, staggering a bit… none of these are mortal sins.
Now certain uncorrected habits that cause at least in the short term serious problems can become grave…like perhaps your doctor tells you if you keep eating 7 pieces of cake a day you will seriously harm your health or drop dead…in say three months.
It is more harmful than that, just look at the percentage of the population that are obese. Obesity is the biggest health threat, far bigger than alcohol. People don’t get obese by accident, and many people are recklessly putting their lives at risk through overeating. Does that sound like venial sin?
The best example intemperance that is grave matter…would being drunk to the point of one losing ones reason …(outside say them having to cut your foot off out in the wild…)
Or putting ones life recklessly at risk as a result of intemperant eating?
 
Just FYI, I had trouble accessing the link that Bookcat provided earlier on. The definition of ā€œdrunkenessā€ from Father Haden’s(?) page:

DRUNKENNESS. Overindulgence in alcoholic beverages. On Catholic moral principles, the degree of sinfulness in excessive drinking depends on how this excess is known to affect this particular drinker. It is a **grave matter if **it is foreseen that this drink will cause one to lose the use of one’s senses or will put one in such a state that he or she is no longer able to distinguish right from wrong. It is a venial matter if one has reason for believing that this amount of drinking, though actually excessive, will neither deprive one of the use of one’s senses or of the power to distinguish right from wrong.

Emphasis mine to show the differences described. OP, this is a really good definition and description to go by. It should also not be forgotten that, as has alreday been provided, one incurs grave guilt when one endandgers life (on road, air, or sea) while drinking (i.e. drunk driving).
 
Just FYI, I had trouble accessing the link that Bookcat provided earlier on. The definition of ā€œdrunkenessā€ from Father Haden’s(?) page:

DRUNKENNESS. Overindulgence in alcoholic beverages. On Catholic moral principles, the degree of sinfulness in excessive drinking depends on how this excess is known to affect this particular drinker. It is a **grave matter if **it is foreseen that this drink will cause one to lose the use of one’s senses or will put one in such a state that he or she is no longer able to distinguish right from wrong. It is a venial matter if one has reason for believing that this amount of drinking, though actually excessive, will neither deprive one of the use of one’s senses or of the power to distinguish right from wrong.
That is an excellent definition. Excessive drinking is only grave matter if** it is forseen** that it will lead to a person being unable to distinguish right from wrong. If a person drinks to excess, but is still able to distinguish right from wrong, then it is not grave matter, or if one does not forsee that such drinking will lead to an inability to distinguish right from wrong (even if it ends up that it does) then this is not grave matter either.
 
And presumably the same would apply to the much greater consumption of alcohol on a special ocassion, Christmas, weddings, New Year’s Eve etc.?

It is possible -but still needs to be moderate. And the bride and groom especially

As are individual acts of over-drinking as most people when drunk do not commit mortal sin or lose their reason. Slurring of speech, talking too much, staggering a bit… none of these are mortal sins.

I cannot vouch for that for I do not know their particular state …but suffice it to say that there can be overdoing it that is not grave per se

It is more harmful than that, just look at the percentage of the population that are obese. Obesity is the biggest health threat, far bigger than alcohol. People don’t get obese by accident, and many people are recklessly putting their lives at risk through overeating. Does that sound like venial sin?

Can such individual acts of overeating be venial - yes. Then again some things can be grave -where it is seriously harmful at least in the short term. Like your doctor tells you if you do not give up cake you will be dead in a few months or something…

Or putting ones life recklessly at risk as a result of intemperant eating?
Yes it can… at least in the case of ā€œthe short termā€.
 
That is an excellent definition. Excessive drinking is only grave matter if** it is forseen** that it will lead to a person being unable to distinguish right from wrong. If a person drinks to excess, but is still able to distinguish right from wrong, then it is not grave matter, or if one does not forsee that such drinking will lead to an inability to distinguish right from wrong (even if it ends up that it does) then this is not grave matter either.
Not just about the ā€œinability to distinguish right from wrongā€ā€¦ but that is certainly one.

The complete depriving oneself of ones reason. (For say pleasure -not for say a medical reason -one has to cut out that bullet in the field…)

and of course

For any mortal sin one needs not only grave matter but the needed knowledge and deliberate consent as well.
 
Answer YES or NO to the following questions. (Keep the final number to yourself. I’ll give the solution in a bit)
  1. Do you lose time from work due to drinking?
    YES __ NO __
  2. Is drinking making your home life unhappy?
    YES __ NO __
  3. Do you drink because you are shy with other people?
    YES __ NO __
  4. Is your drinking affecting your reputation?
    YES __ NO __
  5. Have you ever felt guilt or remorse after drinking?
    YES __ NO __
  6. Have you ever got into financial difficulties as a result of drinking?
    YES __ NO __
  7. Do you turn to lower companions and an inferior environment when drinking?
    YES __ NO __
  8. Does your drinking make you careless of your family’s welfare?
    YES __ NO __
  9. Has your ambition decreased since drinking?
    YES __ NO __
  10. Do you crave a drink at a definite time?
    YES __ NO __
  11. Do you crave a drink at a definite time?
    YES __ NO __
  12. Do you want a drink the next morning?
    YES __ NO __
  13. Does drinking cause you to have difficulty in sleeping?
    YES __ NO __
  14. Has your efficiency decreased since drinking?
    YES __ NO __
  15. Is drinking jeopardizing your job or business?
    YES __ NO __
  16. Do you drink to escape from worries or trouble?
    YES __ NO __
  17. Do you drink alone?
    YES __ NO __
  18. Have you ever had a complete loss of memory as a result of drinking?
    YES __ NO __
  19. Has your physician ever treated you for drinking?
    YES __ NO __
  20. Do you drink to build up your self-confidence?
    YES __ NO __
  21. Have you ever been to a hospital or institution because of drinking?
    YES __ NO __
What’s your score?
Sounds like the alcohol Treatment industry is looking for some job security. While it is important to help folks who need it, it would be folly to scare folks into it who don’t.

Here is a more reasonable test… And, questions about blacking out, remembering, etc should be reworded to say, I n the past year…Yeah, when I was eighteen, 40 years ago, I found my limit. But, to be truthful on this test, I would have to answer in the affirmative.

Am I Alcoholic?

Are you wondering if you have an addiction to alcohol?

Are you concerned about the role alcohol plays in your life? With 26 questions, this simple self-test is intended to help you determine if you or someone you know needs to find out more about alcoholism.

Please Note: This test specifically does not include drug use. To take a self-test focused specifically on drug use, please click on Am I Drug Addicted?

Directions: The following questions are a self-test to help your review the role that alcohol plays in your life. Remember that the questions do not include other drugs taken for medical and non-medical uses.
Carefully read each statement. When preparing each response, take into consideration your actions over the course of the past 12 months.

Yes or No: Decide whether your answer is YES or NO and then check the appropriate space. Please be sure to answer every question.

NCADD Self-Test: What are the Signs of Alcoholism?
  1. Do you drink heavily when you are disappointed, under pressure or have had a quarrel
    with someone? Yes No
  2. Can you handle more alcohol now than when you first started to drink? Yes No
  3. Have you ever been unable to remember part of the previous evening, even though
    your friends say you didn’t pass out? Yes No
  4. When drinking with other people, do you try to have a few extra drinks when others
    won’t know about it? Yes No
  5. Do you sometimes feel uncomfortable if alcohol is not available? Yes No
  6. Are you more in a hurry to get your first drink of the day than you used to be? Yes No
  7. Do you sometimes feel a little guilty about your drinking? Yes No
  8. Has a family member or close friend express concern or complained about your drinking? Yes No
  9. Have you been having more memory ā€œblackoutsā€ recently? Yes No
  10. Do you often want to continue drinking after your friends say they’ve had enough? Yes No
  11. Do you usually have a reason for the occasions when you drink heavily? Yes No
  12. When you’re sober, do you sometimes regret things you did or said while drinking? Yes No
  13. Have you tried switching brands or drinks, or following different plans to control your
    drinking? Yes No
  14. Have you sometimes failed to keep promises you made to yourself about controlling or
    cutting down on your drinking? Yes No
  15. Have you ever had a DWI (driving while intoxicated) or DUI (driving under the influence
    of alcohol) violation, or any other legal problem related to your drinking? Yes No
  16. Do you try to avoid family or close friends while you are drinking? Yes No
  17. Are you having more financial, work, school, and/or family problems as a result of
    your drinking? Yes No
  18. Has your physician ever advised you to cut down on your drinking? Yes No
  19. Do you eat very little or irregularly during the periods when you are drinking? Yes No
  20. Do you sometimes have the ā€œshakesā€ in the morning and find that it helps to have a
    ā€œlittleā€ drink, tranquilizer or medication of some kind? Yes No
  21. Have you recently noticed that you can’t drink as much as you used to? Yes No
  22. Do you sometimes stay drunk for several days at a time? Yes No
  23. After periods of drinking do you sometimes see or hear things that aren’t there? Yes No
  24. Have you ever gone to anyone for help about your drinking? Yes No;
  25. Do you ever feel depressed or anxious before, during or after periods of heavy drinking? Yes No
  26. Have any of your blood relatives ever had a problem with alcohol? Yes No
 
Well there you go, we have arrived at a consensus!
One could of course add such things as knowingly becoming addicted to alcohol as being mortal…

the various possible kinds mortal sins that drinking too much can* lead* to…sexual and otherwise…(as you noted).

Possible scandal that could be given say by parents or teachers etc…to the children…etc.

and there can be serious effects to drinking too much alcohol that ought to be considered…
 
Matthew 26
29 * I tell you, from now on I shall not drink this fruit of the vine until the day when I drink it with you new in the kingdom of my Father.ā€

Here, there and everywhere… works for me…

I’ve always heard that one drink per hour can be metabolized. Sometimes I’ll drink a bottle of wine (once or twice a month) but it will take 5-6 hours… basically from dinner to bedtime…

I used to drink a lot of beer but still at about that same pace of one per hour.

When I was younger, pacing at one per hour was tough especially early in the night. Sometimes I might have the first one in 45 mins… maybe the second as well, depends on a lot of factors… who what where when… sometimes adrenaline kicks in on special occasions and you seem like you have a hollow leg… fortunately beer fills you up so it’s easy to back off…

I’ve had a few drinks once or twice a week (usually Friday and Saturday nights) since I was about 14… by the time I got to college I was well seasoned. I saw a lot of nice good inexperienced kids flame out real fast. They couldn’t handle the freedom and temptation. I believe I was fairly responsible then and very responsible now… 40 plus yrs later…
 
I am a recovering alcoholic in AA. I don’t think that the quantity one drinks determines alcoholism; I believe alcoholism is present when drinks are ā€˜craved’, and the use of alcohol negatively affects any aspect of one’s life.
AA is a very spiritual way of life - I highly recommend it for anyone who thinks a problem with alcohol exists.šŸ‘
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top