A
Excess in alcohol can YES be grave matter (drunkness for pleasure to point of loss of reason-- as opposed to medical use in say perhaps having your foot cut off in the wildā¦)I would say that excess in itself is not grave, but that it is grave actions that are committed (while under the influence of alcohol or not) which are grave.
.
The effects of alcohol are on a continuum. The effects start from the moment you take a sip of alcohol.and which of these are we allowed to indulge in ,as long as we donāt "over do it "
Does the Church define drunkenness?the question is how does the Church define drunkenness
Catholic Moral Theology has defined such for centuriesā¦Does the Church define drunkenness?
No you havenāt. You havenāt shown any definition of drunkenness. Youāve shown where the Church says that drunkenness is wrong but nowhere where drunkenness is defined.Catholic Moral Theology has defined such for centuriesā¦(I have noted what that is above).
Really? And what constitutes excess?Intemperance is of degrees. Yes excess in the alcohol is sinful. And not just when one is not able to distinguish right from wrong (that would very excessive to say the least).)
And what constitutes excess drinking? 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10⦠drinks? It is impossible to draw the line simply when it comes to the amount of alcohol drunk, or the level of effect of alcohol (since alcohol takes effect before the first glass is finished). The line can be drawn, however where the amount drunk directly leads a person to sin, or to be in a position where they cannot distinguish right from wrong. This depends on the person and his ability to manage the effects of alcohol.There is excess in drinking alcohol (intemperance) that is venially sinful and that which is mortally sinful.
And what about a person enjoying three, four, five, six, seven, eight ⦠glasses of wine?Does that mean one is not to enjoy a glass or so of say wine?That such is contrary to temperance? No. But moderation is key.
Temperence is a virtue, but it applies as much to food as it does to alcohol. How many people seem to criticise the amount of food eaten by people at Christmas, Thanksgiving etc?Let us life the virtue of temperance.![]()
Yes it is and yes it does.No you havenāt. You havenāt shown any definition of drunkenness. Youāve shown where the Church says that drunkenness is wrong but nowhere where drunkenness is defined
Yes have noted regarding what Catholic Moral Theology would say is mortal sinā¦and what is venial
The effects of alcohol are a continuum and take effect from the first drink.
Really? And what constitutes excess?
That which is contrary to the virtue of temperance
It is not the consumption of alcohol itself (or the effects of alcohol) but the actions that may result from the consumption of too much alcohol that constitutes the sin.
Both. Excess in the consumption of alcohol is sinful in the excess --prior to any other aspects.
And what constitutes excess drinking? 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10⦠drinks? It is impossible to draw the line simply when it comes to the amount of alcohol drunk, or the level of effect of alcohol (since alcohol takes effect before the first glass is finished). The line can be drawn, however where the amount drunk directly leads a person to sin, or to be in a position where they cannot distinguish right from wrong. This depends on the person and his ability to manage the effects of alcohol.
On lower level - there is not a particular ānumberā -the virtues of prudence and temperance -taking into account the person etc must judge. What is venially contrary to temperance for me may not be for youā¦
Temperence is a virtue, but it applies as much to food as it does to alcohol. How many people seem to criticise the amount of food eaten by people at Christmas, Thanksgiving etc?
And so intemperence in food is less sinful than intemperence in drink? What about people who sit down with the clear intention of eating a huge amount of food? How is that worse than someone sitting down with the intention of drinking a huge amount of drink? It that simply because alcohol has an effect on the body that food does not? Why is that an issue if a person can manage these effects so that they do not lead him into sin? Chemical effects on the body are not in themselves sinful. And from health grounds, and harm to society, obesity presents more damage to health and is a bigger killer than alcohol. Yet lack of temperence in food is less sinful?(note too that individual acts of intemperence in food are usually venialā¦where as many in society make it a goal to get quite drunk⦠.)
Yes often.And so intemperence in food is less sinful than intemperence in drink?
A great many people can get drunk (often considerably drunk) and still be in control of their reason regarding committing mortal sin. Some people are much better at managing the effects of alcohol than others.Yes often.
And yes people are more apt to commit mortal sin via alcohol (how in our culture may set out to be very drunk? --to many) than food.
And presumably the same would apply to the much greater consumption of alcohol on a special ocassion, Christmas, weddings, New Yearās Eve etc.?And I would say that the measure of such can be effected to by the occasion - what is reasonable on say a feast is different than ordinary life.
As are individual acts of over-drinking as most people when drunk do not commit mortal sin or lose their reason. Slurring of speech, talking too much, staggering a bit⦠none of these are mortal sins.Individual acts of overeatingā¦intemperance are āordinarilyā a āvenial matterā for venial sinā¦
It is more harmful than that, just look at the percentage of the population that are obese. Obesity is the biggest health threat, far bigger than alcohol. People donāt get obese by accident, and many people are recklessly putting their lives at risk through overeating. Does that sound like venial sin?Now certain uncorrected habits that cause at least in the short term serious problems can become graveā¦like perhaps your doctor tells you if you keep eating 7 pieces of cake a day you will seriously harm your health or drop deadā¦in say three months.
Or putting ones life recklessly at risk as a result of intemperant eating?The best example intemperance that is grave matterā¦would being drunk to the point of one losing ones reason ā¦(outside say them having to cut your foot off out in the wildā¦)
That is an excellent definition. Excessive drinking is only grave matter if** it is forseen** that it will lead to a person being unable to distinguish right from wrong. If a person drinks to excess, but is still able to distinguish right from wrong, then it is not grave matter, or if one does not forsee that such drinking will lead to an inability to distinguish right from wrong (even if it ends up that it does) then this is not grave matter either.Just FYI, I had trouble accessing the link that Bookcat provided earlier on. The definition of ādrunkenessā from Father Hadenās(?) page:
DRUNKENNESS. Overindulgence in alcoholic beverages. On Catholic moral principles, the degree of sinfulness in excessive drinking depends on how this excess is known to affect this particular drinker. It is a **grave matter if **it is foreseen that this drink will cause one to lose the use of oneās senses or will put one in such a state that he or she is no longer able to distinguish right from wrong. It is a venial matter if one has reason for believing that this amount of drinking, though actually excessive, will neither deprive one of the use of oneās senses or of the power to distinguish right from wrong.
Yes it can⦠at least in the case of āthe short termā.And presumably the same would apply to the much greater consumption of alcohol on a special ocassion, Christmas, weddings, New Yearās Eve etc.?
It is possible -but still needs to be moderate. And the bride and groom especially
As are individual acts of over-drinking as most people when drunk do not commit mortal sin or lose their reason. Slurring of speech, talking too much, staggering a bit⦠none of these are mortal sins.
I cannot vouch for that for I do not know their particular state ā¦but suffice it to say that there can be overdoing it that is not grave per se
It is more harmful than that, just look at the percentage of the population that are obese. Obesity is the biggest health threat, far bigger than alcohol. People donāt get obese by accident, and many people are recklessly putting their lives at risk through overeating. Does that sound like venial sin?
Can such individual acts of overeating be venial - yes. Then again some things can be grave -where it is seriously harmful at least in the short term. Like your doctor tells you if you do not give up cake you will be dead in a few months or somethingā¦
Or putting ones life recklessly at risk as a result of intemperant eating?
Not just about the āinability to distinguish right from wrongā⦠but that is certainly one.That is an excellent definition. Excessive drinking is only grave matter if** it is forseen** that it will lead to a person being unable to distinguish right from wrong. If a person drinks to excess, but is still able to distinguish right from wrong, then it is not grave matter, or if one does not forsee that such drinking will lead to an inability to distinguish right from wrong (even if it ends up that it does) then this is not grave matter either.
Sounds like the alcohol Treatment industry is looking for some job security. While it is important to help folks who need it, it would be folly to scare folks into it who donāt.Answer YES or NO to the following questions. (Keep the final number to yourself. Iāll give the solution in a bit)
Whatās your score?
- Do you lose time from work due to drinking?
YES __ NO __- Is drinking making your home life unhappy?
YES __ NO __- Do you drink because you are shy with other people?
YES __ NO __- Is your drinking affecting your reputation?
YES __ NO __- Have you ever felt guilt or remorse after drinking?
YES __ NO __- Have you ever got into financial difficulties as a result of drinking?
YES __ NO __- Do you turn to lower companions and an inferior environment when drinking?
YES __ NO __- Does your drinking make you careless of your familyās welfare?
YES __ NO __- Has your ambition decreased since drinking?
YES __ NO __- Do you crave a drink at a definite time?
YES __ NO __- Do you crave a drink at a definite time?
YES __ NO __- Do you want a drink the next morning?
YES __ NO __- Does drinking cause you to have difficulty in sleeping?
YES __ NO __- Has your efficiency decreased since drinking?
YES __ NO __- Is drinking jeopardizing your job or business?
YES __ NO __- Do you drink to escape from worries or trouble?
YES __ NO __- Do you drink alone?
YES __ NO __- Have you ever had a complete loss of memory as a result of drinking?
YES __ NO __- Has your physician ever treated you for drinking?
YES __ NO __- Do you drink to build up your self-confidence?
YES __ NO __- Have you ever been to a hospital or institution because of drinking?
YES __ NO __
One could of course add such things as knowingly becoming addicted to alcohol as being mortalā¦Well there you go, we have arrived at a consensus!