mitzi1155:
Thank you for your advice - it is very helpful and wise but I still am in a state of complete turn-off with her. How can one feel that way about one’s own mother? It crushes me. Again, thank you and God Bless.
I’m not sure I’m buying that you are in “complete” turn-off, because you seem to me you’d rather see the problem improved than to get rid of her – even as you ponder whether it is best for both of you to be apart. Maybe it’s in my mind, but I sense a twinge of hope, though maybe faint, coming from your direction.
To both mitzi and Chris, the top set of questions was intended to be mostly to help characterize the issue. The bottom three questions were intended to isolate the nature of the issue so that a “recommended” type of response can be taken.
Maybe before those are of any value, we have to step back a bit. The context where I learned “assertiveness” and where the bottom three questions were valuable, had as a basic assumption “I’m OK, you’re OK.” It sounds like this assumption may be flawed, thus the “standard” remedies for the three types of problems may not apply.
The problem with “I’m OK, you’re not OK” as in aggressive or superior attitude, is it causes resentment from the other to you. The problem with “you’re OK, I’m not OK” as in someone who lets their own opinions always be overridden by anothers, causes resentment from you to the other, even though you may not even notice that resentment. If you see neither of you as OK, I’m not sure because we didn’t cover that.
Once you make the assumption that neither person seems to act “superior” or “more important” or “more OK” than you can go on to the next part. From mitzi’s responses, it might be beyond what my assertiveness class can provide.
Briefly, for those who are interested, the response to “my problem” is something like, “I feel X when Y because Z.” Note that does NOT say that Y
caused my feelings, thus blaming the other person for one’s feelings. The “because” can be important too since the other one may totally miss it and presume “why” you feel sad and be wrong enough about it that you can talk past each other and never deal with the issue. Simply draw it to their attention, and since the presupposition to this whole thing is both people care about the other’s happiness and is willing to listen, it starts the conversation without any blaming or whining involved.
The solution to needs conflicts was pretty vague, mostly just problem solving techniques. The key is to notice that it is a needs conflict, rather than dome direct confrontational issue. My kid may think I’m being stubborn if I don’t let him use the car, for example, but maybe he doesn’t need the car; he just needs a ride somewhere and we can work it out.
The third one, values collision, is even more vague. Pretty much you let the person know once that you have some reservations about their behavior, then let it go, and if they don’t change, get over it.
Like I said, I don’t know whether any of this applies because I’m not convinced we’re up to the point of “I’m OK, you’re OK” yet.
Alan