A
adf417
Guest
Today’s reading in John 17: 20-26 reminds me of a question I have been thinking about for a while now. What does “may they all be one…” mean to you?
Perhaps you’ll gain some insight on this by reading this *Decree On Ecumenism *from Vatican II, UNITATIS REDINTEGRATIO …The question is, then, is there any sense- any at all- in which a Catholic can experience unity (so understood as submission-related) with a non-Catholic? I submit that if you guys can find a way to make this happen, you will be able to replace your goal of converting all Christians to Catholicism with something that is more achievable and realistic.
I’m not sure what the difference would be. People would have to agree on (and so submit to) doctrine in any case and many Protestants disagree with each other on these matters. But if it did happen the name of the institution/church wouldn’t much matter-we’d all be one in will and beliefs.Jesus got a little more specific at certain points- something along the lines of “one as I and the Father are one,” and there might have been a place where He involved the entire triune nature of the Godhead.
My contribution is that it must have something to do with submission. Not where submission is a bad word or necessarily implying mastery of one over another, but in the sense that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit have mutual submission to one another. The question is, then, is there any sense- any at all- in which a Catholic can experience unity (so understood as submission-related) with a non-Catholic? I submit that if you guys can find a way to make this happen, you will be able to replace your goal of converting all Christians to Catholicism with something that is more achievable and realistic.
Yet there is a sense in which Protestants from various denominations can and do submit to one another, even if there are doctrinal differences. This is very common in any sort of para-church organization or inter-denominational outreach effort. Matter of fact, you need look no further than a completely average Protestant missions agency.I’m not sure what the difference would be. People would have to agree on (and so submit to) doctrine in any case and many Protestants disagree with each other on these matters. But if it did happen the name of the institution/church wouldn’t much matter-we’d all be one in will and beliefs.
I guess it depends on the definition of “submitting”, or on what, exactly, one is submitting to. While various denominations, including Catholics, work together on a variety of activities and ministries, at some point complete unity is compromised by doctrinal differences depending on how extreme or critical those differences are. I mean, many of the Protestant denominations divided with each other over these very matters to begin with. ,Yet there is a sense in which Protestants from various denominations can and do submit to one another, even if there are doctrinal differences. This is very common in any sort of para-church organization or inter-denominational outreach effort. Matter of fact, you need look no further than a completely average Protestant missions agency.
For me, one sheep, one shepherd.Today’s reading in John 17: 20-26 reminds me of a question I have been thinking about for a while now. What does “may they all be one…” mean to you?
Be one in spirit, even if being literally one Church is no longer possible.Protestants can achieve a level of cooperation and unity with each other that Catholics cannot achieve with non-Catholics, so I would suggest taking measures that allow you to catch up. By a higher level of submission, I mean the submission that is required for people of different denominations to work closely in a united effort to convert people to Christianity and, together, establish new houses of worship that we call “churches.” Catholics can cooperate in some (but not all) types of humanitarian efforts and a somewhat narrowly defined set of initiatives intended to help Christians become better Christians, but you have a to draw the line at outreach and church-building…and most humanitarian efforts that involve adults, actually, because all non-Catholic humanitarian aid to the developing world includes some kind of support for contraception as a means of doing some good. Basically, you’ve got some lines and some limitations that prevent you from being able to work as well or as closely with others as you might- and, for that matter, as we do.I guess it depends on the definition of “submitting”, or on what, exactly, one is submitting to. While various denominations, including Catholics, work together on a variety of activities and ministries, at some point complete unity is compromised by doctrinal differences depending on how extreme or critical those differences are. I mean, many of the Protestant denominations divided with each other over these very matters to begin with. ,
JL: Jn17:20 Neither pray I for these alone, but for them also which shall believe on me THROUGH THEIR WORD; 21 That they all may be one; as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us: THAT THE WORLD MAY BELIEVE that thou hast sent me. 22 And the glory which thou gavest me I have given them; that they may be one, even as we are one: 23 I in them, and thou in me, THAT THEY MAY BE MADE PERFECT IN ONE**; and THAT THE WORLD MAY KNOW that THOU HAST SENT ME, and hast loved them, as thou hast loved me.Today’s reading in John 17: 20-26 reminds me of a question I have been thinking about for a while now. What does “may they all be one…” mean to you?
Six,Protestants can achieve a level of cooperation and unity with each other that Catholics cannot achieve with non-Catholics, so I would suggest taking measures that allow you to catch up. By a higher level of submission, I mean the submission that is required for people of different denominations to work closely in a united effort to convert people to Christianity and, together, establish new houses of worship that we call “churches.” Catholics can cooperate in some (but not all) types of humanitarian efforts and a somewhat narrowly defined set of initiatives intended to help Christians become better Christians, but you have a to draw the line at outreach and church-building…and most humanitarian efforts that involve adults, actually, because all non-Catholic humanitarian aid to the developing world includes some kind of support for contraception as a means of doing some good. Basically, you’ve got some lines and some limitations that prevent you from being able to work as well or as closely with others as you might- and, for that matter, as we do.
Additionally. There hasn’t been that many Protestant denominations that were formed out of doctrinal disagreement. In most cases, reference to a Protestant denomination as a sect is a bit of a misnomer. Mainline denominations formed as a result of sectarian conflict with Rome (which obviously puts both parties at fault, seeing as how you’ll turn right around and give equal blame to a mainline denomination and anything that might break from them for sectarian reasons). But the vast majority of Protestant denominations were not formed as a result of anything remotely sectarian. Most of the 30,000 new denominations that have formed since the early-mid 1800s have neen the product of the cooperative efforts that were previously described- and in both the short and long term, denominations that are born of such cooperation tend to do better than those that are birthed through painful dissent and disagreement. This is one if the keys to understanding the evolution and development of Protestantism. We couldn’t pissibly be doing this well if we consistently operated as a bunch of tiny militant states at war with each other, always hurting ourselves and each other. Catholics somehow believe rhis sort of narrative, but it can’t possibly account for what we now have and how we got here.
Are you ready to “submit” to the Augsburg Confession?Yet there is a sense in which Protestants from various denominations can and do submit to one another, even if there are doctrinal differences. This is very common in any sort of para-church organization or inter-denominational outreach effort. Matter of fact, you need look no further than a completely average Protestant missions agency.
Examples of how not to be one: One follows Paul, another follows Apollos, and Jim Dandy follows Cephas. Let’s be honest with each other, people, the main barrier to following Christ as one is not doctrinal differences. It’s tribalism, and in this case, it answers primarily to the cult of personality. Doctrinal differences can be worked through, but the most trenchant problem is the attitude that out of all the Christians, you can only work and cooperate fully with the ones who join you in union to the chair of Cephas in Rome. As long as that is the case, you remain closed off to avenues toward unity apart from that unattainable goal. I’m not talking about a variety of ways you can cooperate, either. I’m talking about a sufficient level of cooperation that you can have with Christians outside your tribe.Six,
Can you elaborate from your perspective, if I were to turn the question around to the negative – What does “may they all NOT be one…” mean to you?
Further elaborate, if different, as Catholicism notwithstanding.
I am truly trying to understand this from other perspectives but if just doesn’t make sense thus far.
Peace!!!
A knowledge of the history of Christianity and the history of the Bible written by accredited, university-trained, objective, peer-reviewed historians would serve all Christians well. I recommend Dr. Warren H. Carroll’s A History of Christendom in six volumes. Or, if you’d prefer something more concise, there is Diane Moczar’s little book,* What Every Catholic Wants to Know, Catholic History, From the Catacombs to the Reformation*.Examples of how not to be one: One follows Paul, another follows Apollos, and Jim Dandy follows Cephas. Let’s be honest with each other, people, the main barrier to following Christ as one is not doctrinal differences. It’s tribalism, and in this case, it answers primarily to the cult of personality. Doctrinal differences can be worked through, but the most trenchant problem is the attitude that out of all the Christians, you can only work and cooperate fully with the ones who join you in union to the chair of Cephas in Rome. As long as that is the case, you remain closed off to avenues toward unity apart from that unattainable goal. I’m not talking about a variety of ways you can cooperate, either. I’m talking about a sufficient level of cooperation that you can have with Christians outside your tribe.
To make a long story short Jesus’ prayer here signifies what he wishes that like the relationship between both the Father and SonToday’s reading in John 17: 20-26 reminds me of a question I have been thinking about for a while now. What does “may they all be one…” mean to you?
I don’t want to put words in your mouth, but are you saying that you feel all Christians are currently “one” in Christ sense all these same Christians follow Christ and not Apollo? Do you consider all protestants currently “one” in Christ? Do you consider all Evangelicals currently “one” in Christ? I’m just trying to understand what this “all be one” would look like from outside my tribe.Examples of how not to be one: One follows Paul, another follows Apollos, and Jim Dandy follows Cephas. Let’s be honest with each other, people, the main barrier to following Christ as one is not doctrinal differences. It’s tribalism, and in this case, it answers primarily to the cult of personality. Doctrinal differences can be worked through, but the most trenchant problem is the attitude that out of all the Christians, you can only work and cooperate fully with the ones who join you in union to the chair of Cephas in Rome. As long as that is the case, you remain closed off to avenues toward unity apart from that unattainable goal. I’m not talking about a variety of ways you can cooperate, either. I’m talking about a sufficient level of cooperation that you can have with Christians outside your tribe.