All heathens to Hell?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DonQuichote1235
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The Church is making no such distinction in Canon Law AND the Catechism, subtle or otherwise.
 
The untold argument off of this has been refuted. Please read the thread. And I didn’t realize until now how heretical Unitatis redintegratio was either…
[/quote]

The title of the thread should scare you in all honesty.
 
Because it discusses the possibility of hell for those not in communion with the Church. (not an idea I like to throw around, but the idea is on the table, and you are parsing who’s really Catholic and who’s not, so…)
 
Last edited:
I see the subtle little attack there…suggesting that everyone who doesn’t agree with you is a schismatic.
[/quote]

No, that’s not going to work,
You are parsing who is really Catholic, while you reject the living Magisterium.

so let’s discuss the topic. Let’s be honest.
 
Valid Baptism always imparts sanctifying grace whether administered to Protestans or Catholics. Indeed, Baptized Protestants are in degrees of unity with the Church because they have become one flesh with us as Christ’s Mystical Body on earth. This is why Baptized Protestants who become Catholic are errantly called “converts.” They are not converts to the Church, but rather come into Full Communion. They also come into institutional unity with the Holy Church at that time through ascent to Catholic Doctrine via the profession of faith. At the moment of profession, the candidate, already long a member of Christ’s Body through with us trough the One Baptism becomes also a Catholic.
 
Last edited:
Thomistic theology isn’t the official teaching of the church. It’s a permissible school of thought within the church, but so is Molinism and neither are the official teaching of the Church. The Church chooses neither, but allows both.
 
Last edited:
The living Magisterium has said that Unitatis redintegratio is not binding teaching, so where is the rejection, if you don’t mind my asking?
[/quote]

Please just read the thread, don’t burden other posters with your work.
 
You remind me very much of a monk I knew, Br. Frowin, O.S.B. Great comments.
 
You DO realize that Pope Paul V issued a decree in 1607 (that as far as I know has never been repealed) forbidding the Thomists and the Molinists from accusing each other of heresy? A decree you just violated!
 
You better research again, because far from being declared a heresy, it’s a permissible school of theological thought within the church.
 
I’m sorry, do you have a problem with Archbishop Pozzo? With Cardinal Felici? Or with Popes St. John XXIII and Bl. Paul VI?
[/quote]

DO YOU KNOW WHAT THE MAGISTERIUM IS?
You posted nothing approaching magisterial material.
You posted from a Traditionalist apologetic.
 
Isn’t the bishop quoting (indirectly) the Council itself?
 
Last edited:
Die Zeit is a left-wing, secular newspaper…
[/quote]

Ummmm…

onepeterfive.com

Abp. Pozzo on SSPX: Disputed Vatican II Documents Are Non-Doctrinal

In a recent interview published by the German weekly newspaper Die Zeit (32/2016), Italian Archbishop Guido Pozzo (64), Secretary of the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei (PCED)…
onepeterfive.com onepeterfive.com

Not a very good effort on your part.

Back to the topic:
DO YOU KNOW WHAT THE MAGISTERIUM IS?
You posted nothing approaching magisterial material.
You posted from a Traditionalist apologetic.
 
Last edited:
Die Zeit is a left-wing, secular newspaper…
[/quote]

Ummmm…

onepeterfive.com

Abp. Pozzo on SSPX: Disputed Vatican II Documents Are Non-Doctrinal

In a recent interview published by the German weekly newspaper Die Zeit (32/2016), Italian Archbishop Guido Pozzo (64), Secretary of the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei (PCED)…
onepeterfive.com onepeterfive.com

Not a very good effort on your part.

[/quote]

…??? It’s a translation of the original article, which can be found here…http://www.zeit.de/2016/32/piusbruderschaft-kirche-papst-franziskus

I’m sorry, but if you’re not even going to read the source I gave you, then it doesn’t seem useful for me to continue this “dialogue” with you.
[/quote]

Dont lose your courage now.
I read the article.
Back to the topic:
DO YOU KNOW WHAT THE MAGISTERIUM IS?
You posted nothing approaching magisterial material.
You posted from a Traditionalist apologetic.
 
Some of this thread reminds me of an incident I saw on another Catholic website: A self-proclaimed “Thomist” accused the Catechism, and through it the Magisterium, of heresy because it differed from Thomistic theology on free will.
 
Nope. The Catechism is the official teaching of the Catholic Church, Aquinas is NOT.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top