All Seeing Eye

  • Thread starter Thread starter dominikus28
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
D

dominikus28

Guest
As far as I know, the all seeing eye, as seen on the one dollar US bill, is the sign of freemasonry and is therefore evil. Then what is the bishop in the picture doing in front of that eye? That golden one is from a church in Greece. What’s with that?
 
It’s the eye of providence, God’s all seeing eye. The triangle surrounding the eye represents the Holy Trinity. The freemason’s have a version, as do the Egyptians. The Christian version usually incorporates a triangle.
 
You might find some branches of Masonry using double-headed eagles, too.

But before that it was a symbol for the union of two natures in Christ.
 
just because a relatively modern group (and freemasons are a relatively modern group, coming out of the so-called Enlightenment in Europe, despite their fabricated history) adopts an ancient symbol, Christian or otherwise, and uses it in their writings and rituals, does not mean they own the symbol or that the symbol has lost its original meaning.
 
Quite right, puzzleannie.

The same symbol can have different meaning in different contexts.
 
The Upside down cross is another good example of this…

The Upside down cross represents Peters Christian humility… A symbol each of us could learn from

But modern times has distorted an otherwise wholesome and purely Christian symbol into something twisted.

However, this is the ultimate goal of Satan, take something Good, and make us think it is evil.

In Christ
 
heisenburg said:
The Upside down cross represents Peters Christian humility… A symbol each of us could learn from
Click to expand...
There was an interesting episode of the X-Files with these monks who wore upside-down crosses, and everyone thought they were satanic, but then they learned these guys were of a Petrine order. 😃
 
It represents the Trinity of god and it should face down.
G-d left, Yeshua Right and the Holy Spirit down.
Don’t take that triangle too serious. We honor god and nothing else. I think they have putted the eye in there because god sees everything, however, stupid because it represents the pyramid and the Eye of Ra.

If you said this because of Zeitgeist don’t worry, there was no one similar to Jesus. I’ve looked it all up. I was kinda shocked that people could lie like that just to put Christians down. This is a mad world trust nobody except G-d and his words!!!
Peace,
 
dominikus28 said:
As far as I know, the all seeing eye, as seen on the one dollar US bill, is the sign of freemasonry and is therefore evil. Then what is the bishop in the picture doing in front of that eye? That golden one is from a church in Greece. What’s with that?
Click to expand...
As far as I know there’s no reason for us to believe Freemasonry is evil, or else much of my family, including several ministers, are evil scheming men looking for a way to destroy Christianity (despite the fact that they also preached it on the side). The problem with it, as far as the Church has stated to my knowledge, isn’t that it is evil, but that, though some do not see it, that it promotes indifference to other faiths.
And while we’re on the subject of corrupted symbols, I couldn’t let a chance go by to promote my favourite forgotten and now considered evil symbol, the Pentagram! In the past it was used by Christians as a symbol to ward off evil, but for the most part to represent the ‘Big Fives’, such as the Five Wounds of Christ or the Five Sorrows (and Joys) of Mary. Ever thing comes in fives, doesn’t it?
 
puzzleannie said:
just because a relatively modern group (and freemasons are a relatively modern group, coming out of the so-called Enlightenment in Europe, despite their fabricated history) adopts an ancient symbol, Christian or otherwise, and uses it in their writings and rituals, does not mean they own the symbol or that the symbol has lost its original meaning.
Click to expand...
As a matter of fact, the Moderns (Enlightenment) form of Freemasonry claims that it was started by them in the back room of a London Ale-House on the 24th June 1717. There are no actual records of this event. They deny the history of Free Masonrie prior to 1717 although they also claim that “four old lodges” came together in order to form their so-called “Grand Lodge”.

This is the truth of the matter:
“After the establishment of the Kilwinning (c. AD 1140) and York Lodges (AD 926) the jurisdiction and antiquity of the Grand Lodge of York over other English Lodges has invariably been acknowledged by the whole Fraternity, the principles of Freemasonry rapidly spread throughout both Kingdoms and several Lodges were erected in different parts of the island.” (SOURCE: A Brief History of Lodge Mother Kilwinning No. 0, Grand Lodge of Scotland, June 1944)
Click to expand...
"It is to be regretted that the records of the “Four Old Lodges” do not antedate those of the ‘Grand Lodge’, they brought into existence, as fortunately happens in the case of the single lodge which blossomed into the ‘Grand Lodge of all England, held at York,’ " (SOURCE: The History of Freemasonry, Vol. IV by Robert Freke Gould, 1884)
Click to expand...
“The ‘General Regulations’ of the Grand Lodge at London, printed in the year 1723, was for the use of “the Lodges in and about London and Westminster,” being thus orginally a Metropolitan organisation. At the time they were printed, there was an older authority at work in the City of York, as a “time immemorial” Grand Lodge, whose preserved records date from 1705, but the Grand Lodge was a very old one at that time.” (SOURCE: Freemasonry in the Early 1600’s and 1700’s by W.J. Hughan)
Click to expand...
Anderson was one of the originators of the London Grand Lodge, and as a man of strong prejudices he was biased in all his inditings, evidences of which are seen throughout his two publications on every possible occasion, in the omission of historical facts, or giving the contrary construction to, and diverting attention in cases reflecting unfavourably upon the New Grand Lodge. The Books of Anderson, however, are almost universally accepted by the Masonic fraternity as containing a true history of Freemasonry, at least from the time our review commences, and the Ancient Charges, especially those contained in the 1723 edition, are as generally adopted as the fundamental law and basis of Masonic principles. But notwithstanding Anderson’s Books of Constitutions were published by order of the London Grand Lodge, with its approval and sanction, yet no more untrustworthy, unreliable books were ever printed under the direction of any organised association. We affirm that Anderson is not to be credited. The Books of Constitutions were written purposely to deceive, to mislead and misrepresent facts as they existed; and if his reports of Grand Lodge Proceedings are true copies of Grand Lodge Records, then the records were corrupted with the design to mislead the reader." (SOURCE: Freemasonry in England from 1567 to 1813, Ancient York and London Grand Lodges , pages 15 and 16, by Leon Hyneman, 1877)
Click to expand...
"The other thing that we have to remember is that Catholics, in those days, could be Freemasons. In fact, it was the only organization in England that afforded them equality within society since the day King James VII of the Scots (James II of England) had been deposed. (He had wanted everyone within the boundaries of his kingdoms to worship according to their own conscience.) With the Stewarts out of the political picture in Britain, “liberty of conscience” and the concept of equality were firmly ousted. This meant that politics reverted back to the status quo, and no one but Anglicans had any rights at all. In order to retain this status quo, all lodges in England, or as many as possible, were to be taken over, subverted, even eradicated if necessary. Although 1717 saw a new, London-based Masonic impetus, working to restore the Stewarts to their rightful inheritance, the plan was foiled after the failure of the Atterbury plot to overthrow George I in 1722. In 1723, at the end of the Duke of Wharton’s grand mastership, the Grand Lodge of England was taken over by Hanoverian (sic Protestant) infiltrators. (It is interesting to note, in passing, that the lodge’s archival records, from its inception in 1717 to June 24, 1723, have totally vanished.) (SOURCE: The Knights Templar of the Middle East by Michael James Alexander Stewart and Walid Amine Salhab, published by Weiser, 2007)
Click to expand...
The truth of the matter is that the religious form of Free Masonrie has existed in the British Isles since time immemorial and it is definitely NOT a product of the Enlightenment, believing as it does in God the Creator and Preserver of all things and the immortality of the soul, without evasion, equivocation, or mental reservation of any kind.
 
bpbasilphx said:
Quite right, puzzleannie.

The same symbol can have different meaning in different contexts.
Click to expand...
I accept with information: The Upside down cross is another good example of this…
The Upside down cross represents Peters Christian humility… A symbol each of us could learn from. But modern times has distorted an otherwise wholesome and purely Christian symbol into something twisted.
 
So freemasonry is not evil, huh?
Just research Albert Pike who is still regarded in America as an eminent and influential Freemason. This he wrote:

“Lucifer, the Light-bearer! Strange and mysterious name to give to the Spirit of Darkness! Lucifer, the Son of the Morning! Is it he who bears the Light, and with its splendors intolerable, blinds feeble, sensual, or selfish souls? Doubt it not!”

“Morals and Dogma of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry” p. 321

Yes, it is Lucifer who brings enlightenment. Didn’t you know?
 
If you google **Catholic Church Jesuits and the New World Order ** You will find all sorts of crazy.
 
GeorgeSword said:
As far as I know there’s no reason for us to believe Freemasonry is evil, or else much of my family, including several ministers, are evil scheming men looking for a way to destroy Christianity (despite the fact that they also preached it on the side). The problem with it, as far as the Church has stated to my knowledge, isn’t that it is evil, but that, though some do not see it, that it promotes indifference to other faiths.
Click to expand...
The Church has condemned Freemasonry; anyone practicing it in the Church is to be charged with excommunication. cin.org/users/james/files/masons1.htm

scripturecatholic.com/freemasonfaq.html good read on the subject.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top