I found the verses
And in the Qu’ran, I found this:
Muslims may want to also raise the issue of Bible corruption, that these biblical references are corrupted. Apart from the fact that Muslims have no conclusive and convincing evidence to support such a position, it is apparent that those Muslims who would even posit this theory haven’t pondered this matter seriously. If the Muslims are correct then this means that copyists and scribes corrupted the text so as to give God even greater glory, exalting him even higher than the Quran exalts Allah!
There is a further problem with Allah swearing by things other than himself. Swearing by something that is less than myself, I am actually weakening the value of my statement. An oath is supposed to increase the weight or seriousness of what I say, but if I swear by something less than myself, I am decreasing the weight of my claim. In case people do not want to see these Quranic oaths as deification, or shirk, they still have a problem since the value of the oath is connected with the value of the entity that is appealed to. If one does not want to agree that an oath by the fig (S. 95:1) elevates the fig to a position of deity (shirk), then one has the opposite effect that the value of the oath is decreased to the value of the fig. Does that then mean Allah is not serious? Is he even joking? Perhaps Allah never intended to keep his oaths when swearing by all these other things? After all, his statements and promises are accompanied by oaths to trivial things, not to himself.
(
Source)
I found this answer on
Yahoo Answers (same question):
natiqkadim
May be he sware of things he create and wants us to think of these things because a great thing there must be someone greater that creat it.