Yes, but Pope Benedicts Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum states that the rubrics of 1962 are to be faithfully followed.
The Rubrics of the 1962 Missal indicate that the server is a ‘he’ (the masculine cases are used exclusively). So whoever is making the responses, moving the book, ringing the bells and holding the paten, etc… is to be male.
A Motu Proprio is a higher authority than Canon Law and supercedes it ( in fact it is the hightest authority document on Church governance a Pope can issue)
What is also interesting is that the Pope himself is the Legislative Authority ( Canon 16), so any questions (like if the ‘he’ in the 1962 Missal can also refer to females) must be directed to the Pope alone. Of course the Pope may delegate the decision, but it must go to the Pope.
Rulings specifically based on Interpretations of Canon Law cannot be used in lieu of a Papal decision as Motu Proprio supercedes that.
The document you are refering to was issued as an “Authentic Interpretation” of Canon 230.2
adoremus.org/CDW-AltarServers.html
As you can see, it cannot apply to Summorum Pontificum, both because the issuing authority ( the CDWDS) has no jurisdiction to rule on SP under Canon 16 ( it was not the Legislating Authority, the Pope Himself is), and SP supercedes Canon Law anyway.
Does that help?