Am I Catholic?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Raygan
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Why is it ideal for Protestants and not ideal for Catholics. I see nothing wrong with anyone being raised by their family since birth, regardless of their faith, but I would also consider it to be ideal, or nearly ideal, for anyone to consciously choose their own faith.

Your brother in Christ,

Bill Velek
What i meant was that the thought you are putting forth is new in the timeline of Christianity. Not that it is “only good” for Protestants. parents choose for their children, thats how it has always been. As an adult i choose to stick with the truth, Catholicism.
 
What i meant was that the thought you are putting forth is new in the timeline of Christianity. … SNIP
Ohhh, … it was a misspelling. You meant to type “idea”. I get fat fingers all the time. No worry.

Your brother in Christ,

Bill Velek
 
  1. Why would that be the case? (That Supakay who was a Catholic should abstain from communion.)
    A. Fornication or adultery or unchastity, and scandal (bad example leading others into sin, such as those observing, and each other).
2a. Does the Catholic Church consider a marriage outside of the Church a mortal sin?
2b. Or does the Catholic Church consider such a marriage null and void, even if it were performed in a Christian Church ceremony?
A. A Catholic is bound to the Catholic form of marriage and this requires the approval of the Catholic Church. Without that, a Catholic is not actually married.

3a. Does the Catholic Church therefore consider the act of making love to be fornication and therefore a mortal sin?
3b. If not a mortal sin, then what would be the basis for denying the Eucharist?
A. Fornication or adultery or unchastity, and scandal. Some Catholics that have a merely civil marriage my also be remarried. The culpability it is unknown so this objectively grave sin could be either mortal or venial.
  1. If a person is otherwise adhering to the teachings of the Catholic Church, does the mere fact of having married outside the church automatically take them “out of communion” with the Church, i.e., ‘ex communicate’ them?
    A. It is not excommunication. It may be fornication or adultery or unchastity, and scandal.
Famaliaris Consortio, St. Pope John Paul II, 1981: c) Catholics in Civil Marriages
  1. There are increasing cases of Catholics who for ideological or practical reasons, prefer to contract a merely civil marriage, and who reject or at least defer religious marriage. Their situation cannot of course be likened to that of people simply living together without any bond at all, because in the present case there is at least a certain commitment to a properly-defined and probably stable state of life, even though the possibility of a future divorce is often present in the minds of those entering a civil marriage. By seeking public recognition of their bond on the part of the State, such couples show that they are ready to accept not only its advantages but also its obligations. Nevertheless, not even this situation is acceptable to the Church.
The aim of pastoral action will be to make these people understand the need for consistency between their choice of life and the faith that they profess, and to try to do everything possible to induce them to regularize their situation in the light of Christian principle. While treating them with great charity and bringing them into the life of the respective communities, the pastors of the Church will regrettably not be able to admit them to the sacraments.

w2.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/apost_exhortations/documents/hf_jp-ii_exh_19811122_familiaris-consortio.html
 
Famaliaris Consortio, St. Pope John Paul II, 1981: (Continued) e) Divorced Persons Who Have Remarried
  1. Daily experience unfortunately shows that people who have obtained a divorce usually intend to enter into a new union, obviously not with a Catholic religious ceremony. Since this is an evil that, like the others, is affecting more and more Catholics as well, the problem must be faced with resolution and without delay. The Synod Fathers studied it expressly. The Church, which was set up to lead to salvation all people and especially the baptized, cannot abandon to their own devices those who have been previously bound by sacramental marriage and who have attempted a second marriage. The Church will therefore make untiring efforts to put at their disposal her means of salvation.
Pastors must know that, for the sake of truth, they are obliged to exercise careful discernment of situations. There is in fact a difference between those who have sincerely tried to save their first marriage and have been unjustly abandoned, and those who through their own grave fault have destroyed a canonically valid marriage. Finally, there are those who have entered into a second union for the sake of the children’s upbringing, and who are sometimes subjectively certain in conscience that their previous and irreparably destroyed marriage had never been valid.

Together with the Synod, I earnestly call upon pastors and the whole community of the faithful to help the divorced, and with solicitous care to make sure that they do not consider themselves as separated from the Church, for as baptized persons they can, and indeed must, share in her life. They should be encouraged to listen to the word of God, to attend the Sacrifice of the Mass, to persevere in prayer, to contribute to works of charity and to community efforts in favor of justice, to bring up their children in the Christian faith, to cultivate the spirit and practice of penance and thus implore, day by day, God’s grace. Let the Church pray for them, encourage them and show herself a merciful mother, and thus sustain them in faith and hope.

However, the Church reaffirms her practice, which is based upon Sacred Scripture, of not admitting to Eucharistic Communion divorced persons who have remarried. They are unable to be admitted thereto from the fact that their state and condition of life objectively contradict that union of love between Christ and the Church which is signified and effected by the Eucharist. Besides this, there is another special pastoral reason: if these people were admitted to the Eucharist, the faithful would be led into error and confusion regarding the Church’s teaching about the indissolubility of marriage.

Reconciliation in the sacrament of Penance which would open the way to the Eucharist, can only be granted to those who, repenting of having broken the sign of the Covenant and of fidelity to Christ, are sincerely ready to undertake a way of life that is no longer in contradiction to the indissolubility of marriage. This means, in practice, that when, for serious reasons, such as for example the children’s upbringing, a man and a woman cannot satisfy the obligation to separate, they “take on themselves the duty to live in complete continence, that is, by abstinence from the acts proper to married couples.”(180)

Similarly, the respect due to the sacrament of Matrimony, to the couples themselves and their families, and also to the community of the faithful, forbids any pastor, for whatever reason or pretext even of a pastoral nature, to perform ceremonies of any kind for divorced people who remarry. Such ceremonies would give the impression of the celebration of a new sacramentally valid marriage, and would thus lead people into error concerning the indissolubility of a validly contracted marriage.

By acting in this way, the Church professes her own fidelity to Christ and to His truth. At the same time she shows motherly concern for these children of hers, especially those who, through no fault of their own, have been abandoned by their legitimate partner.

With firm confidence she believes that those who have rejected the Lord’s command and are still living in this state will be able to obtain from God the grace of conversion and salvation, provided that they have persevered in prayer, penance and charity.

w2.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/apost_exhortations/documents/hf_jp-ii_exh_19811122_familiaris-consortio.html
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top